Do units with 1/3 or 2/3rd movement left have thier attack strengths reduced?

[Artifex]

I scoured the civilopedia for an answer and found none and when I attack I dont get a warning like in civ 2 that I am attackling at reduced strength. So I assumed that this aspect didn't carry over and as long as you can attack it is at full strength, but whenever I attack a city with 1/3 movement left it seems I always get killed handely even if the odds are in my favor so I thought maybe this carried over from civ 2.

I noticed when my cavalry attacks a musketman and it started right next to it than its combat performance is much better it will win 75% of the time. Then I noticed when I move up a road and then barely make it to the enemy city with 1/3 movement..the musketeers will kill me without usually losing so much as one point of thier health time and again about 100% of the time. I notice a definant differance in my combat performance in this case. This seems fishy..if it is still like civ 2 that you attack with reduced strength with 2/3 or 1/3 movement they could have at least put it in the rules somewhere or gave a warning. sheesh.

[FrantzX]

No.

[Artifex]

I guess its bad karma then..

[muxec]

So is it realy reduce attack?

[Blake]

At times it seems the combat results are based on bad karma....

[notyoueither]

They even out with numbers of tries, but they do go in strings sometimes.

So does life.

[Marquis de Sodaq]

No - I've won too many times with 1/3 movement point left to believe otherwise.

[Cyclotron]

Civ2 did this, and warned you about this. Civ3 does not warn you, because the attack number does not change.

While Civ2 made fractional movement into a penalty for various things (only a part chance of going another tile with 1/3 mp left, reduced attack), Civ3 views any unit with fractional mp as a whole mp with regards to doing anything except moving on roads.