Originally posted by Solver
Civ 2 was, at best, an x-pack of Civ 1, not a sequel. Graphics got much worse! I never confused anything in Civ 1, and multiple times did in Civ 2.
Little new concepts. Stupid Caravans remained. Settlers making improvements also remained, another thing I hated. Ahh .
Civ 2 was, at best, an x-pack of Civ 1, not a sequel. Graphics got much worse! I never confused anything in Civ 1, and multiple times did in Civ 2.
Little new concepts. Stupid Caravans remained. Settlers making improvements also remained, another thing I hated. Ahh .
"back then" , computer's and the gaming industry where not even one percent of what they are now , ....
so we cant blame them now , its something totally different , ...and the options are so much greater now , ....
anyway , civ 3 aint bad .
have a nice day
Comment