Some cool ideas Thrawn, but like you say it might be too ambitious a change for Civ3.
Nationalism would be a great trigger for things to change somehow.
It would be very cool to be able to purchase land. However, I doubt anyone would be willing to sell. I'm almost certain none of us civ players would have sold the Louisianna purchase or Alaska to the US. Along these lines, if the AI was as paranoid about land sales as it is about giving cities, it would never happen.
I sure would love if forts gave some cultural control! Would give more reason to build them. However, it would be tough to balance them. If cities have priority over them, then they would be no more valuable than colonies. Maybe if they gave culture control over the square they are on, as long as they are connected to a culuture border of one of your cities.
Nationalism would be a great trigger for things to change somehow.
It would be very cool to be able to purchase land. However, I doubt anyone would be willing to sell. I'm almost certain none of us civ players would have sold the Louisianna purchase or Alaska to the US. Along these lines, if the AI was as paranoid about land sales as it is about giving cities, it would never happen.
I sure would love if forts gave some cultural control! Would give more reason to build them. However, it would be tough to balance them. If cities have priority over them, then they would be no more valuable than colonies. Maybe if they gave culture control over the square they are on, as long as they are connected to a culuture border of one of your cities.
Comment