The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
Fighter escorts were only available when near the airbase. Bombers were often unescorted when going deep.
Bombers were always unescorted when going deep. Fighters just didn't have the range in order to keep up. They'd fall from the sky from lack of fuel half way to the target point. That's probably why bombers were built with 3 or 4 gun turrets.
Fighter escorts were only available when near the airbase. Bombers were often unescorted when going deep.
Not entirely true. Naval bombers were nearly always accompanied by fighter escort. At the end of 1943 P-51s escorted bombers and provided cover all the way to the target.
Not entirely true. Naval bombers were nearly always accompanied by fighter escort. At the end of 1943 P-51s escorted bombers and provided cover all the way to the target.
Venger
That's because they could bring the carriers in closer to the target and shorten the range enough that the fighters could be involved as well. In the case of the bombing of Berlin, which is what I think of when you're talking about "going deep", a fighter would never be able to make it there and back. And I think the game is set up with that sort of scenario in mind as well, so no fighter escort.
Originally posted by Venger
Not entirely true. Naval bombers were nearly always accompanied by fighter escort. At the end of 1943 P-51s escorted bombers and provided cover all the way to the target.
Venger
As the war progressed Allied airbases got closer and closer to the enemy capitals. The Pacific campaign was largely about airbases; Doolittle, on the other hand, had no fighter support.
It's hard to fit naval warfare into Civ. I mean, the numbers of units involved are usually a lot lower than on the ground (fleets of a few ships instead of thousands of troops), the move a lot faster, the engagements are usually quicker, and "attrition" just doesn't work the same.
- I think the biggest enhancement would be to allow privateers and subs to CHOOSE which unit they attack when they attack a square. They'd go after merchants, probably kill them, and then try to get away before the warships counterattack.
- The Yamato and Musashi were never really able to conduct any effective offensive operations, but they were really difficult to kill. It required dozens of bomb and torpedo hits and hundreds of aircraft. I think extra defense points would be good. If it was Civ2, you could just give it a few million hit points.
(they should also be more expensive than normal battleships)
Originally posted by Willem
In the case of the bombing of Berlin, which is what I think of when you're talking about "going deep", a fighter would never be able to make it there and back. And I think the game is set up with that sort of scenario in mind as well, so no fighter escort.
Quite wrong - ever heard of "drop tanks"? Well before D-Day, US fighters were escorting bombers all the way to BErlin from bases in England. Fat Hermann, while languishing in prison during the Nuremburg trials, is reported to have said that he knew the war was lost the first time he looked up and saw a pair of P-51's over Berlin.
Originally posted by Barnacle Bill
Quite wrong - ever heard of "drop tanks"? Well before D-Day, US fighters were escorting bombers all the way to BErlin from bases in England. Fat Hermann, while languishing in prison during the Nuremburg trials, is reported to have said that he knew the war was lost the first time he looked up and saw a pair of P-51's over Berlin.
The unescorted missions had disastrous results for the bombers. During a bombing mission over Schweinfurt, Germany on October 14, 1943 to bomb the large ball bearing factories so crucial to the German war effort, the U.S. Eighth Air Force were attacked by a large number of Luftwaffe fighter aircraft. Out of 229 bombers over Scheinfurt, 60 were shot down and 17 more were irreparably damaged. This loss rate was was unacceptable and proved that the allied bombing campaign over Germany could not continue unless the bombers could be accompanied by fighter aircraft.
Originally posted by Encomium
German Me-109's escorted Luftwaffe bombers over England in the Battle of Britain.
American P-51 Mustangs escorted B-17's deep into Germany.
So lack of fighter escort capabilities is a problem in Civ III.
But the inability of bombers in Civ III to sink warships is so stupid it greatly hurts the game,
Being somewhat repetitious: The Germans had airbases just a few miles away from Britain. Fighter escorts for deep bombing missions in Europe didn't start until the last half of the war. The Pacific campaign was all about securing airbases. Bombers have longer ranges than fighters, so it is just a matter of how far the bomb site is.
Being somewhat repetitious: The Germans had airbases just a few miles away from Britain. Fighter escorts for deep bombing missions in Europe didn't start until the last half of the war. The Pacific campaign was all about securing airbases. Bombers have longer ranges than fighters, so it is just a matter of how far the bomb site is.
If you want to avoid "repetion", get it right. To say the Luftwaffe had airbases just "a few miles" from Britain is a ridiculous exaggeration.
Bomber escort COULD always occur in WW II. But missions DEEP into Germany had to wait for the Thunderbolt and Mustang.
So, some escort should always be possible.
None of that is nearly as important as the idiocy of bombers not being able to sink warships in Civ III.
Comment