Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Fortresses: A Quote for Jeffrey Morris of Firaxis!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Fortresses: A Quote for Jeffrey Morris of Firaxis!

    Originally posted by Jeffrey Morris of Firaxis:
    In this game you need to defend your TERRITORY, not just your cities, or you will be swiftly punished. I find myself building hillside fortresses more in this game than Civ2/SMAC et al. One advanage of this terrain improvement is the zone of control it gives units normally without one (read: most ancient and middle ages units). But it's their ability to protect vital trade roads, colonies, and goods that makes them invaluable.
    Link to Thread

    This is so cool! It's like building castle fortresses in order to protect your land... giving you a zone of control over an area is so important for defence!

    This game is going to be so incredible! There is so many possible strategies, that it's mind boggling!
    Of the Holy Roman Empire, this was once said:
    "It is neither holy or roman, nor is it an empire."

  • #2
    We can build the Maginot line

    Comment


    • #3
      What about if you're under a democracy? Does that 3 space rule still apply or else you get discontent?
      Humans are like cockroaches, no matter how hard you try, you can't exterminate them all!

      Comment


      • #4
        Executor... I think you need to re-read my thread.
        Of the Holy Roman Empire, this was once said:
        "It is neither holy or roman, nor is it an empire."

        Comment


        • #5
          What thread? The quote says nothing about discontent.

          EDIT: I found the thread. Could you point to a specific quote, please? It's 5 pages long.
          12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
          Stadtluft Macht Frei
          Killing it is the new killing it
          Ultima Ratio Regum

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Executor
            What about if you're under a democracy? Does that 3 space rule still apply or else you get discontent?
            What 3 space rule?
            (\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
            (='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
            (")_(") "Starting the fire from within."

            Comment


            • #7
              The fortresses are now much more useful than in previous editions. Now they are strategic sites that must be defender until the END!





              Yep.
              Roman: Civilization belongs to the civilized. Attila: It belogs to those who have the power to conquer it. Me: Nope, it belongs to me. Coz ive paid 50 bucks and it has a 30 days satisfaction guarantee.
              Asesino_Virtual

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Urban Ranger


                What 3 space rule?
                Units create unhappiness in Democracy or Republic unless they are in cities, or fortresses within 3 spaces of a city.

                Comment


                • #9
                  I'm sure that has been changed to be within a civilization's borders.
                  Of the Holy Roman Empire, this was once said:
                  "It is neither holy or roman, nor is it an empire."

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Jason Beaudoin
                    I'm sure that has been changed to be within a civilization's borders.
                    Nice summary, and I hope you're right for the sake of my precious roads.

                    David
                    "War: A by-product of the arts of peace." Bierce

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      hrm. in a civs borders you say.

                      well if you are a democracy, changes are you got tons of moneyt to throw around on culture, and to spend supporting a military. and if you have huge cultural borders, you could, in theory, enroach on an enemy and bombard them with cannons/catapults/battleships from within your own borders.



                      and i hope your not able to bombard from INSIDE a city.

                      "I've lived too long with pain. I won't know who I am without it. We have to leave this place, I am almost happy here."
                      - Ender, from Ender's Game by Orson Scott Card

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by UberKruX
                        you could, in theory, enroach on an enemy and bombard them with cannons/catapults/battleships from within your own borders.

                        And the problem would be..........? Is it the fact that I can now engage in combat with my democratic forces while my citizens remain content because said forces are within my borders? That seems reasonable to me. Americans only get upset when the infantry goes marching in. As long as we engage from a distance (and thus incur no casualties), people seem relatively content.

                        and i hope your not able to bombard from INSIDE a city.

                        Because...........?

                        Sorry, Jingo, but I'm not seeing your point. If located in a city, why would I be unable to train my cannon/artillery/battleship guns on an enemy outside of the city?
                        "Stuie has the right idea" - Japher
                        "I trust Stuie and all involved." - SlowwHand
                        "Stuie is right...." - Guynemer

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          by the way, hope bombarding will be more effective this time.. i never find the heavy artillary stuff in SMAC useful..

                          heard that it will again not be possible to kill an opponent just by bombarding.. ;(

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Fortresses

                            Very nice

                            I don't think artillery bombardment should allow for unit destruction- not historical, and too unbalancing in the game. I for one wouldn't build any other ground troops, since I can take out everything from afar with 'ultimate artillery'.

                            But the fortresses- now that is very kewl. Everytime I play CivII or SMAC I want to build forts and bunkers, but they were never very effective. Plus there was always that possiblity of the enemy capturing them and using it to his advantage. Even though enemy capture may still be possible, the fortress bonuses will be too good to pass them up.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Yeah, in SMAC building artillery was useless, except for defending against ships, IIRC.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X