Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

They are abusing of our goodwill! SimGolf 10 bucks cheaper than CIVIII!

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by Swissy


    Actually it is the other way around. The SIM franchise is considerably more valuable than the Civ franchise. Simulation type games far outsell strategy games. This is basically Infogrames saying those civfanatics will pay anything for Civ3. So bend over civfans.
    Sim games are more for the casual gamer than strategy games are.

    I used to like sim city and a bunch of the other sim games, but then they got old and boring. Sim City 3000 was a ripoff.

    Comment


    • #17
      Could someone please explain to me why on earth someone wants to sit their butt in a chair and pretend to play golf on a computer all day? You could go OUTSIDE and play it in REAL LIFE. I mean, with Civ3, I can't really be the leader of a civilization over 6000 years of history. But I can go play golf to my heart's content.

      Reason SimGolf is cheaper--it was cheaper to make.
      Tutto nel mondo è burla

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by Akron


        Sim games are more for the casual gamer than strategy games are.

        I used to like sim city and a bunch of the other sim games, but then they got old and boring. Sim City 3000 was a ripoff.
        I took it back to Best Buy and screamed for my money back the next day. $40 for a cartooned-up version of SC2K that had a horrifically bad interface. No thank you!

        I recently picked up a used copy for $10. That's worth it, as it does provide a little bit of an alternative "distraction" game.
        Tutto nel mondo è burla

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by Boris Godunov
          Could someone please explain to me why on earth someone wants to sit their butt in a chair and pretend to play golf on a computer all day? You could go OUTSIDE and play it in REAL LIFE. I mean, with Civ3, I can't really be the leader of a civilization over 6000 years of history. But I can go play golf to my heart's content.

          Reason SimGolf is cheaper--it was cheaper to make.
          I would guess because it's probably a lot easier to win on a computer. Why suck in real life when you can be great on a computer? [/sarcasm]

          Comment


          • #20
            I would guess because it's probably a lot easier to win on a computer. Why suck in real life when you can be great on a computer? [/sarcasm
            I can only say that if, by and large, the best players of a sport are middle-aged, fat white guys who dress badly, it can't be all that hard to be good at it.

            Tutto nel mondo è burla

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Boris Godunov


              I can only say that if, by and large, the best players of a sport are middle-aged, fat white guys who dress badly, it can't be all that hard to be good at it.

              lol, be quiet! I attempted to play it once at a country club I go to sometimes.. suffice to say I failed miserably.

              Comment


              • #22
                I think you'd be amazed at how much money golf sims have raked in over the years. They can be played at any time, day or night irrespective of weather conditions and don't take 4 plus hours to complete. They don't cost a fortune in membership fees and you can play any course you like no matter how many thousands of miles away they are. It's also a lot easier to get a scratch handicap and you can play from the office

                Golf business sims are a new breed and we'll have to see if they succeed or fail. I suspect the golf fanatics may well stay with the perfect game simulators which leaves commercial success down to the wannabe tycoons.
                To doubt everything or to believe everything are two equally convenient solutions; both dispense with the necessity of reflection.
                H.Poincaré

                Comment


                • #23
                  simgolf won't be worth the cardboard box it will be packed in

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    The Sims sucks. It's really bad.


                    Swissy,

                    When did the Simsomething games become simulations? AFAIK Maxis calls them "software toys." Hardly hardcore simulation games a la Harpoon.
                    (\__/) 07/07/1937 - Never forget
                    (='.'=) "Claims demand evidence; extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence." -- Carl Sagan
                    (")_(") "Starting the fire from within."

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by SteveJH


                      I would guess because it's probably a lot easier to win on a computer. Why suck in real life when you can be great on a computer? [/sarcasm]
                      Well, because computer golf, or any other computer sport just isn't the same as physically playing the sport.

                      Anyway, if anyone thought Sid had "good taste", this notion should be forever dispelled by the fact that he made a golf game as well as those leader pics for civ3

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        I think some people need to chill......

                        Who's for a nice relaxing round of golf?
                        A witty quote proves nothing. - Voltaire

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          hmmm

                          Before bashing a game atleast do some reasearch. SimGolf isn't going to be a golf game as a simulation on building a gold course and running it, Think RollerCoaster Tycoon. Plus if you don't want to pay 40-50 bucks for computer games you can thank those l33t H@ck0rs who pirate thems.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Please Firaxis, I beg you after Civ III, never do anything for Infogrames again!


                            That means no Civ4. Infogrames owns the Civ francise. But I agree, Infogrames isn't a good publisher.

                            Everything else you said is spot on. Two different publishers.
                            “I give you a new commandment, that you love one another. Just as I have loved you, you also should love one another. By this everyone will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another.”
                            - John 13:34-35 (NRSV)

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Please Firaxis, I beg you after Civ III, never do anything for Infogrames again!
                              I would definitely agree if Infogrames didn't own civ.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
                                That means no Civ4. Infogrames owns the Civ francise. But I agree, Infogrames isn't a good publisher.

                                Everything else you said is spot on. Two different publishers.
                                Well, hopefully Civ IV in five years is going to be far enough off that we don't need to worry about Infogrames. Either by them going out of business or being bought out by a better company such as EA or someone else.
                                About 24,000 people die every day from hunger or hunger-related causes. With a simple click daily at the Hunger Site you can provide food for those who need it.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X