Tweet
I will not debate their actions in reality here, but I liked this unit in Civ2 and ToT very much - so is there any info if they are in civ3 too?
-
Blah -
Nothing known about them?
Or in other words: bump!
Blah -
Dan Magaha's avatar shows a fancy medieval knight, surely a Civ3 unit, but I guess it's not a crusader..."An intellectual is a man who doesn't know how to park a bike"
- Spiro T. AgnewComment
-
Crusaders? Good unit, but the Knight is good enough- I mean if it is a special unit for the French, Germans, and/or English it is a good idea- but not everyone had Crusaders... IF you argued it Islam had a sort of crusader...-->Visit CGN!
-->"Production! More Production! Production creates Wealth! Production creates more Jobs!"-Wendell Willkie -1944Comment
-
Yes, Fiera, I think Dan´s knight is the normal Civ3 knight (which i like very much).
I think the crusades should be reflected in the game. I only hope they get rid of the Crusade wonder from Civ2, I never understood why it gaves you more production...More trade woul be better in my eyes.BlahComment
-
You are right.
There are just a few civilizations that actually had crusaders.
Maybe should the King Richard's Crusade wonder or Vatican City give you (and maybe your allies?) a special bonus unit: The crusader.Comment
-
I liked the Crusaders very much, but I think they were perhaps a bit too strong...Now, if I ask myself: Who profits from a War against Iraq?, the answer is: Israel. -Prof. Rudolf Burger, Austrian Academy of Arts
Free Slobo, lock up George, learn from Kim-Jong-Il.Comment
-
I think the French (Franks) were the ones who dominated the crusading in the Holy Land, so the Crusader could very well be their special unit.CSPAComment
-
Yes, therefore I liked themOriginally posted by Comrade Tribune
I liked the Crusaders very much, but I think they were perhaps a bit too strong...
But I don´t believe they were too strong, only one attack point stronger than the normal knight, and weaker in defense, that is ok...BlahComment
Comment