about cease fire.

[Gangerolf]

Cease fires are for IMO. It's against my civing principles. If let's say the Zulus would attack my peaceful Frenchmen, I would have no choice but genociding them. No compromising with the enemy, no negotiating with villains.

I hope they have enough intelligent to agree with me offering them protection if they give me one of their cities and 10 gold per turn. (I like playing godfather)

That's a great idea. Hihi. After I've buried the Zulus I'd ask my puny Babylonian neighbours if they'd be willing to pay me for protecting them (from me). It's kind of like the "we demand tribute for our patience"-thing though.

[Inverse Icarus]

actually Harrison, it appears that Units are not tradeable.

at least i haven't seen it in the diplomacy images

[Grim Legacy]

Originally posted by UberKruX
actually Harrison, it appears that Units are not tradeable.

at least i haven't seen it in the diplomacy images

Hm I don't think I'll miss that very much. Trading military units is unrealistic. If you want to have some concept of mercenaries, it should not be dealt with in this way. You might send a unit to help out, but always keep control.

[seer_98]

>Hm I don't think I'll miss that very much. Trading military units is unrealistic. If you want to have some concept of mercenaries, it should not be dealt with in this way. You might send a unit to help out, but always keep control.

Unrealistic for say America to sell F-14 fighters to Germany? I disagree. You should be able sell units.

[dearmad]

Yes, but trading a Legion seems unreasonable. What would the dividing line be? And would there still be that backward engineering of Tech effect in Civ3- if you gave the Chinese a spy plane, for example... would they learn anything from the technology in it?

[Inverse Icarus]

What about Isreal's Airforce? Part of it is American made planes.

also, Soviet Union "help" in NAM, "dontating" tanks to the Veit.