Are the mountains to high and unproportional?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The mountain Poll
Collapse
X
-
-
Voila a reply of a nonscandinavian.
I think those mountains are OK like they are.(We don't have mountains )It is only a game remember,why don't ask if the units aren't represented to big.(since the squares represent area's of at least some square km)
Shadeex-president of Apolytonia former King of the Apolytonian Imperium
"I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work." --Thomas Alva Edison (1847-1931)
shameless plug to my site:home of Civ:Imperia(WIP)
Comment
-
I really have no problem with the size/look of the mountains...but I do believe the graphics depiction of the road could use some work. Right now the road network just looks like they have been painted on and in so doing, the road look like they are actually "floating" above and over the mountains....so I voted for option #3.____________________________
"One day if I do go to heaven, I'm going to do what every San Franciscan does who goes to heaven - I'll look around and say, 'It ain't bad, but it ain't San Francisco.'" - Herb Caen, 1996
"If God, as they say, is homophobic, I wouldn't worship that God." - Archbishop Desmond Tutu
____________________________
Comment
-
I don't think they're too high, it's just that they are too isolated; they should be more tiles together, and at least some hills...
Also, diagonal tile connections (Forests, hills, mountains) would also be nice...
Of course, in a short while there will be lots of new terrain graphics sets...
I have very few of the original CIV2 terrain graphics...
I think i only have rivers, pollution, and SOME special resources...Indifference is Bliss
Comment
-
Originally posted by Wittlich
. . . the road network just looks like they have been painted on and in so doing, the road look like they are actually "floating" above and over the mountains....so I voted for option #3.
Comment
Comment