Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

I Don't Wanna See this Happen Again...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    DOS is simple, easy to use, and virtually crash-free...

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by death_head
      DOS is simple, easy to use, and virtually crash-free...
      Do you have DOS mixed up with Linux by any chance?


      Yes, the blasted thing still hasn't died properly. It is a pain. I see that it just isn't microsoft that has a penchant for ancient pieces of code...
      My Windows machine is running Windows 2000 and it has properly killed DOS as will Windows XP. I recommend a switch, it is much more stable.
      About 24,000 people die every day from hunger or hunger-related causes. With a simple click daily at the Hunger Site you can provide food for those who need it.

      Comment


      • #18
        tniem: I don't think he has... Linux is by no chance simple, it is not easy to use, and not completely crash-free (I've had a kernel panic resulting from "trying to kill the idle task" after just keeping yes '' on for too long and trying to shut down... I regarded it as an extremely occasional and random crash).

        On the other hand, DOS was quite simple both to the computer and to the user. In fact, it was so simple for both that if you knew how to program your programs wouldn't crash (that is, they wouldn't crash randomly... they WOULD crash for hardware differences, as there weren't so many interfaces to use. OTOH, now that there are interfaces, the crashes are random ).

        And I thought that DOS was easy to use until I found out about the auto-completing in Linux. The very best thing after sliced bread and multithreading .
        This is Shireroth, and Giant Squid will brutally murder me if I ever remove this link from my signature | In the end it won't be love that saves us, it will be mathematics | So many people have this concept of God the Avenger. I see God as the ultimate sense of humor -- SlowwHand

        Comment


        • #19
          My problem with Win2000 is the problem of backwards compatibility, although I am interested in what Windows XP has in store. I will have to 'acquire' it somehow I would probably vouch for a memory upgrade on my PC if this came out, get my 128Mb up to 384Mb
          Speaking of Erith:

          "It's not twinned with anywhere, but it does have a suicide pact with Dagenham" - Linda Smith

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Dida
            Gameplay is very important, but so is the graphics. Remember, no one will ever use MS Windows, if not for the Graphical User Interface.
            May I add that people only use Windows because of the ms office and games!! Because games are much easyer to program with all the available tools for windows.
            "BANANA POWAAAAH!!! (exclamation Zopperoni style)" - Mercator, in the OT 'What fruit are you?' thread
            Join the Civ2 Democratic Game! We have a banana option in every poll just for you to vote for!
            Many thanks to Zealot for wasting his time on the jobs section at Gamasutra - MarkG in the article SMAC2 IN FULL 3D? http://apolyton.net/misc/
            Always thought settlers looked like Viking helmets. Took me a while to spot they were supposed to be wagons. - The pirate about Settlers in Civ 1

            Comment

            Working...
            X