Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Radar

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Radar

    I don't think anything has been mentioned about radar being implemented in Civ III. I really think the implementation of radar would really make wars in the latter part of the game a lot more interesting. If you didn't have radar you would be subdued to a lot of unnoticed attacks. If you did have radar obviously you would be able to see the coming of attacks. I really wish radar would be added to Civ III.
    However, it is difficult to believe that 2 times 2 does not equal 4; does that make it true? On the other hand, is it really so difficult simply to accept everything that one has been brought up on and that has gradually struck deep roots – what is considered truth in the circle of moreover, really comforts and elevates man? Is that more difficult than to strike new paths, fighting the habitual, experiencing the insecurity of independence and the frequent wavering of one’s feelings and even one’s conscience, proceeding often without any consolation, but ever with the eternal goal of the true, the beautiful, and the good? - F.N.

  • #2


    No Radar? That is discouraging. I guess it is back to having units sleeping everywhere just waiting to get attacked to tell us where the enemy is coming from.

    Comment


    • #3
      Maybe I should have been a little more detailed in my explaining. What I mean is that a city could build radar as a city improvement. What it would do is increase the site of seeing untis from just being the city borders to one more square out. Understand?
      However, it is difficult to believe that 2 times 2 does not equal 4; does that make it true? On the other hand, is it really so difficult simply to accept everything that one has been brought up on and that has gradually struck deep roots – what is considered truth in the circle of moreover, really comforts and elevates man? Is that more difficult than to strike new paths, fighting the habitual, experiencing the insecurity of independence and the frequent wavering of one’s feelings and even one’s conscience, proceeding often without any consolation, but ever with the eternal goal of the true, the beautiful, and the good? - F.N.

      Comment


      • #4
        Actually, radar has been mentioned, by me, it was a while back...lets see, I think in december 2000. anyway, it has been mentioned, and I think it is a great idea, in fact, I think if firaxis wants civ3's combat to be realistic (especially naval combat), then radar is a must, if implemented correctly that is. when I first suggested it, I only got a couple replies, and those that did reply, said it was a dumb stupid idea.

        well, i just think it is a grande idea.

        look up my old thread, it is RADAR, it will probably be back a LLLOOONNGG way back, but you may get something out of it, i posted every detail in it about my idea.

        Comment


        • #5
          I liked the way CTP and CTPII handeled the radar idea. I hope that Sid does somethine similar for Civ3. I'm tired of suprise attacks.

          Comment


          • #6
            Gee - who would have thought that suprise attacks would be part of warfare??

            By the way, I see very little difference between your avatar and a Neo-Nazi avatar.
            A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.

            Comment


            • #7
              Radar is one of those minor things that you expect to be in the game...and don't notice until its not there

              I would assume it will be there in some form , but then again I shouldn't assume.
              "Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys."
              --P.J. O'Rourke

              Comment


              • #8
                Mr. Fun it's very unlikely now a days to have surprise attacks with all the radar. I think radar should come out with maybe raido. Surprise attacks are very difficult to accomplish. As they should be in Civ III as well. Plus I don't really like having 8 thousand English ships stationed right next to my cities in the water without me knowing. You probably say then put your ships out there, I say I don't like to have revolutions because of unhappiness from my units out of the city.
                However, it is difficult to believe that 2 times 2 does not equal 4; does that make it true? On the other hand, is it really so difficult simply to accept everything that one has been brought up on and that has gradually struck deep roots – what is considered truth in the circle of moreover, really comforts and elevates man? Is that more difficult than to strike new paths, fighting the habitual, experiencing the insecurity of independence and the frequent wavering of one’s feelings and even one’s conscience, proceeding often without any consolation, but ever with the eternal goal of the true, the beautiful, and the good? - F.N.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Did i miss something? Whats the map for? And whats the purpose of stealth? Sure their should be a radar against stealth, but how can you create surprise attacks without using stealth technology? I'm confused.
                  Alex

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by MrFun
                    By the way, I see very little difference between your avatar and a Neo-Nazi avatar.
                    And people see your avatar as a disgusting example of people's private lives being shoved down their throats. Stop playing Thought Police after a session of sensitivity training. His avatar has been used a state flag and on top of the Dukes of Hazzard car, big freaken deal. Freedom of speech means putting up with everything, not just what you approve of.



                    About radar, I'd like to keep in minimal. At most an expandsion of modern (ground) units visibility to two squares, but I don't want to be able to see every opposing civ units movement in the end-game, imagine how long that would take. I also, as mentioned earlier, think it would take away from the surprises of the game (assuming the AI will be capable of surprising human players)

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Yeah - a flag that represents a past, long-dead regime that was based on convictions of white supremacy and slavery (yes, northern states were almost as bad too).

                      Maybe we should sympathize with those who reminscence about the "lost, gloriful days" of Nazi Germany too. After all, the poor Nazis were simply fighting for the sovereignty of Germany -- let's not focus too much on the Holocaust -- minor incident.

                      There is a difference between my avatar and a neo-Confederate or neo-Nazi avatar. Some people may not approve mine, but the ones I express opposition to are symbols of hate and violence.

                      Yes, there are people who strongly disapprove my avatar, but my avatar is not a symbol of hate or violence.
                      get a clue
                      A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        i think that radar should probably be tile improvements that work like sensors in SMAC, however i think that stealth units should be completely immune to radar

                        MrFun

                        now as far as i remember it's not illegal to be either a neonazi or a neoconfederate (at least not in the usa) so even if civpatriot was a neo nazi...big deal, he has his right to believe in what he wants as long as he doesn't harm others

                        also the conderacy was no nazi germany...the nazi were a genocidal bunch of meglomaniacs (as were the Soviets under stalin...how in the world did he get away all of his murders and most people don't consider him even as evil as hitler?)

                        the confederates most horrible crime was to support an economic system based around the exploitation of one race

                        yes slavery is wrong but it does not compare to genocide!

                        also in the state which i live in homosexual acts (sodomy for one)are illegal while displaying the confederate flag is perfectly legal...MANY people in my country actually believe that homosexuality is an abomination in the face of the christian god, and would rate this defiance of the almighty as a much worse offense to mankind than slavery

                        i do not know of many people today even amongst those who display the confederate flag really advocate a return to economic slavery; white supreamcy is a flawed belief in my opinion that can be overcame by education and just being exposed to other cultures

                        i am an athiest (who just happens to live in the bible belt...i bet you haven't even heard of the tabernacle or pentacostal churchs), i think it's ok to love whoever you want to reguardless of what gender they happen to be, and i think if be bo and luke duke want to cruise in the general lee that's fine too...

                        however i really get mad when people whether it be nazis, leftist, or moderates who want to protect the youth try to enslave people either through legislation or litigation...this to me is a return to slavery

                        i'm a vegitarian and my grandfather happens to be a chicken fighter...i think it is a complete waste of time and an all together stupid sport...however chicken fighting is illegal and congress wants to make it a FELONY to fight chickens...just recently my grandfather got a misdemenor for crulety to animals...i completely disagree with this because all of the chicken fighters in america added together do not kill or maim as many chickens in an entire year as what WAMPLER'S TYSON'S and many other large scale industrial chicken processors kill in one day...iirc the chicken industry kills three million chickens a day...my grandfather fights about thirty chickens a year...my grandfather's fighting chickens live on a large farm all with a coop to themselves and the hens and didis (baby chickens) have the run of the entire farm...chickens in an industrial chicken facility have their beaks cut off so they wont peck each other to death because they are basically on top of each other...one day at a kfc (kentucky fried chicken) one of the employees started yelling at my grandfather after he told her he was a chicken fighter (he had an entry number on his back and she asked what it was for) even though she works in a place that is all about killing chickens...that is hypocracy plain and simple

                        people need to keep their mouths shut and not try to dictate their standards on others; when they don't it really offends many people (like me)

                        civpatriot was neither impolite nor did he make any statements advocating slavery or white supreamcy...i find many more people on this forum much less polite than that one post of his...he is displaying a legitamate state flag (unless they have changed it by now) and for all i know he could be 12 and just found the icon for his state's flag and not even really know what the confederate flag stands for

                        you could have sent him a private message first discussing with him your objections to his avatar, but instead it seems like you just lashed out at him

                        it takes alot to offend me, and while i personally do not find your avatar offensive i'm sure that there are a few who do find it offensive...there are probably a few people who find my avatar offensive...but we all need to get over it, if seeing a tiny icon of a state flag that contains a symbol of a long dead rebellious movement from another country prevents you from enjoying this forum then you really need to calm down some MrFun

                        i have posted here for quite a long time and this is the first time that i have seen civpatriot...so it's not like he's being overly blantant about his avatar or anything

                        so in closing...lets try to focus on civ3 and not avatars in this forum, because i am sure that each and everyone of us can offend someone with at least one of the beliefs we hold

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I do have a clue and believe that not allowing all beliefs whether you apporve are not is bull****. I'm tired of liberal pc bull**** that says anything that might have had racism/intolerance must be eliminated. If that was true the US flag would have been banned long ago for its use as a rallying cry in Manifest Destiny against the Plains Indians.

                          To a lot of people the Confederate flag is not a symbol of hate but a symbol of southern culture and a struggle for the regional/states rights. The civil war did not start over slavery but instead evolved into one.

                          Because some groups of people have taken a symbol and warped its original basis does not mean that some people do not have the right to display it.

                          Your avatar to some is a symbol of immorallity and sickening depravity, yet because gay/lesbian rights is a pc rallying cry, it cannot in any way be denied without cries of freedom of speech, the same rallying cry that is ignored over the Confederate flag.

                          My own views are that the Confederate flag is a symbol of hate and oppression, but that does not mean it should be banned or denied display. My view of your picture is one of disgust and one of the main reasons I turned off avatars, because I think if you want to see two guys getting frisky, do it in your own room, but do I think it should be denied display, no, you have the same right those showing the Confederate flag do, we both live under the same Bill of Rights, one that covers all, not selectively applied. Try opening your eyes, instead of only seeing what you want to.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I agree that Stealth should be deceptable to radar. But if you have a big battleship right next to somebody's city borders (that city has radar) the battleship should be able to be seen. Only if the battleship is very close to the city borders maybe one or two squares away.
                            However, it is difficult to believe that 2 times 2 does not equal 4; does that make it true? On the other hand, is it really so difficult simply to accept everything that one has been brought up on and that has gradually struck deep roots – what is considered truth in the circle of moreover, really comforts and elevates man? Is that more difficult than to strike new paths, fighting the habitual, experiencing the insecurity of independence and the frequent wavering of one’s feelings and even one’s conscience, proceeding often without any consolation, but ever with the eternal goal of the true, the beautiful, and the good? - F.N.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              You guys are sooo right -- having an avatar that shows affection between two people is a symbol of hatred and violence just like a neo-Confederate avatar is.

                              Thank you for explaining how an avatar showing affection between two people is a symbol of hatred just like the neo-Confederate avatar that I dislike.

                              And silly me -- Confederates soldiers should be honored in our memory for fighting for "states" rights. We should also honor the Nazis for fighting for Germany's rights.

                              Anyway, end of this topic -- I stated my opinion, and then people drew this out into an entire discussion.
                              A lot of Republicans are not racist, but a lot of racists are Republican.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X