Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Which Civs should be added after PTW? (part 2...)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    I don't want Firaxis wasting their time on new civs.
    Make them yourself, and push Firaxis to improve the AI.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by Randolph
      I don't want Firaxis wasting their time on new civs.
      Make them yourself, and push Firaxis to improve the AI.
      As I said i can do all the civs I want, but are problems to put them in the game, problems to get them to work as like the other civs....

      But I agree with you with the AI, I think the computer plays like brute force lol he is only preocupied in building cities and military units...

      And one think I dont like too is when I reach arround 1900 and the turns (computer playing) last arround 5-10 minutes!! some times is even worst...
      Brazilian Civilization Avaiable Here By Civ3 Brasil

      Comment


      • #18
        Adding civs is tricky. I mean, when does it stop?

        I vote: mod it yourself or Firaxis make it moddable...

        Comment


        • #19
          Civs?

          Well, Poland seems to be rather controversial. The Poles want it in.

          If any European civilizations should be put in, I think they must be Portugal and Holland (Stadholder Willem van Oranje).

          Middle-eastern civ? Israel. King David. Slinger (fast archer).

          Africa? Ethiopia. Haile Selassie...or perhaps one of the Queens. A fast pikeman.

          Here's my list:

          The Portuguese
          The Dutch
          The Polynesians
          The Khmers
          The Ethiopians
          The Israelites
          The Incas

          That's 7 civs in all.

          Byzantium should not be included, as Rome already covers it. Besides, on world map it would share the same capital with the Ottomans, which would be a rather strange thing indeed.
          Empire growing,
          Pleasures flowing,
          Fortune smiles and so should you.

          Comment


          • #20
            History Guy :
            Don't you think the Mali are more adapted as an African Civ than the Ethiopians ? Sure, the Ethiopians had an organized government for about a millenium, but that's about it. In the case of the Mali, we can really talk about commerce, golden age etc.
            Just my 2 cents
            "I have been reading up on the universe and have come to the conclusion that the universe is a good thing." -- Dissident
            "I never had the need to have a boner." -- Dissident
            "I have never cut off my penis when I was upset over a girl." -- Dis

            Comment


            • #21
              The Incas of course would be my top priority, followed closely by something like Mali. After that, I'd like to see something to start in the western part of North America -- the Hopi, maybe? Too bad we don't know anything about the Anasazi. The Sioux could work too. At any rate, something to fill up that landmass. The Maya would start basically on top of the Aztecs, so there's no point in having them.

              I would like to see the Hebrews/Israel in, as they did have a whopping great effect on the rest of the world, an effect far out of proportion to their size/military power. Slinger is a good UU for them, as is Merkava.

              As far as Eurpoean civilizations go, as others have said there are already enough. I could see an argument being made for the Dutch, the Poles and even the Portuguese, but the bottom line is that Europe is already crowded enough.

              A southeast Asian/Pacific Island civ is a reeasonable choice, but I think you only need one or the other -- Khmer or Polyneisan, but not both.

              As far as the Australian Aborigines go, well, I'm having a real hard time thinking of that as a civilization in the sense of building cities, inventing technology, making advances in art, culture and literature and conquering their neighbors -- they were hunter gatherers for eons and then got conquered by the first folks to come along. I think that status is best represented as a series of goody huts rather than a full-blown civilization. I'm not saying this to denigrate the Aborigines, since I know they had all kinds of interesting culture and oral traditions, but none of it rises to the level of a civilization in the Civ meaning of the term.
              Last edited by Ubergeek; May 14, 2003, 13:35.
              Better living through tyranny

              Comment


              • #22
                Ethiopians
                Mayans
                Polynesians
                Hebrews

                After that, I think you're adding civs just for the sake of adding civs.
                "Guess what? I got a fever! And the only prescription is ... more cow bell!"

                Comment


                • #23
                  I don't see why the Ethiopians should be included. The Nubians (a.k.a. "Ku****es") and Mali, which were both extremely powerful empires.

                  The Incas and the Khmers should definitely be included.
                  "When we begin to regulate, there is naming,
                  but when there has been naming
                  we should also know when to stop.
                  Only by knowing when to stop can we avoid danger." - Lao-zi, the "Dao-de-jing"

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    i want many angry african tribes

                    like zulu

                    cheers

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Basically, I want more non-Euro civs. However, include the Poles, to balance the Russians a little when playing on the World Map. Also, while Middle East is rather crowded already with Turks, Arabs, Persians, Babylonians and Egyptians, I feel the need for the Hebrews to be in too - just because.

                      So, what I'd have is:

                      Inca
                      Mayans
                      Poles
                      Mali
                      Ethiopians
                      Javans
                      Khmer
                      Hebrews
                      "Spirit merges with matter to sanctify the universe. Matter transcends to return to spirit. The interchangeability of matter and spirit means the starlit magic of the outermost life of our universe becomes the soul-light magic of the innermost life of our self." - Dennis Kucinich, candidate for the U. S. presidency
                      "That’s the future of the Democratic Party: providing Republicans with a number of cute (but not that bright) comfort women." - Adam Yoshida, Canada's gift to the world

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by statusperfect
                        i want many angry african tribes

                        like zulu

                        cheers
                        and ethiopians and mali

                        cheers

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Well, it looks like Firaxis is going to add another expansion pack, with 8 new civs. My suggestions:

                          Inca: industrious/militaristic. UU: archer with "all terrain as roads" So 2/1/1, but all terrain as roads. NASTY little bugger, eh?

                          Maya: religious/industrious. UU: ?

                          Khmer: dunno. UU: ?

                          Mali: dunno. UU: ?

                          Nubians: Industrious/? UU: ?

                          Hebrews: religious/militaristic. UU: Merkava? Or something ancient?

                          Polynesians: expansionist/scientific. UU: galley with added movement? Or can safely traverse sea?

                          Anasazi or another Amerind tribe (not the Sioux, though, since they already gave the MW to the Iroqouis): dunno, UU: ?

                          I'd like to see a re-alignment of the cultural groupings:

                          Sub-Saharan Africa: Mail, Nubia, Zulu
                          Ancient Med: Egypt, Babylon, Hebrews
                          Classical Med: Rome, Carthage, Greece, Persia, Celts*
                          Middle East: Turks, Arabs (hmm, a little thin here)
                          Europe: England, France, Germany, Russia, Scandanavia
                          Ancient Americas: Inca, Maya, plus civ to be named later
                          Later Americas: Aztecs, Iroquois, Americans**
                          Asia I: China, Japan, Mongols, Korea
                          Asia II: Khmer, Polynesians, Indians

                          * - Celts could be either "classical med" or "europe" The height of their power, though, fits with the ancient/classical time period.

                          ** - Yeah, I know, America (if anything) is culturally European. But it doesn't belong in Europe either (if you don't like that it's in the game, just edit it out, btw)



                          -Arrian, rambling today
                          grog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!

                          The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            I'd make the Incas Exp/Ind, Mayans Rel/Sci and Hebrews Rel/Com.
                            "Spirit merges with matter to sanctify the universe. Matter transcends to return to spirit. The interchangeability of matter and spirit means the starlit magic of the outermost life of our universe becomes the soul-light magic of the innermost life of our self." - Dennis Kucinich, candidate for the U. S. presidency
                            "That’s the future of the Democratic Party: providing Republicans with a number of cute (but not that bright) comfort women." - Adam Yoshida, Canada's gift to the world

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Stefu,

                              The first two do make sense, especially the Inca. The Mayans could go either way, IMO. Industrious because they built Pyramids and those cool cities, but Scientific because of their work on Astronomy. I still think the Hebrews should be Rel/Mil. Ever read the Old Testament?

                              -Arrian
                              grog want tank...Grog Want Tank... GROG WANT TANK!

                              The trick isn't to break some eggs to make an omelette, it's convincing the eggs to break themselves in order to aspire to omelettehood.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                I'd like to see more culture groups as well as new civs :

                                British Isles: England, Celts
                                Western Europe: Spain, France, Germany
                                Eastern Europe: Scandanavia, Russia
                                Mediterranean: Greece, Rome, Hebrews
                                North Africa: Mali, Nubia, Egypt (*Nubians adopted some of Egyptian architecture and culture)
                                Mesopotamia: Babylon, Assyrians, Persia
                                Middle East: Turks, Arabs
                                East Asia: China, Japan, Korea
                                South Asia: India, Khmer, Java
                                North Americans: Iroquois, Americans
                                Central Americans: Aztecs, Mayans
                                South Americans: Chechapoya, Incas

                                These are two Civs I thought about in adding in a mod:

                                Mayans
                                *Mayans have the unique advantage of having 2 UUs early on
                                Leader: Pacal
                                Traits: Religious, Scientific
                                UU: Plumed Clubman (replaces warrior), Balamob Slingers (all terrain as roads ), Plumed Javelin Thrower (replaces swordsman; has ranged attack ability)

                                Nubians
                                Leader: Taharqa
                                Traits: Militaristic, Expansionist
                                UU: Nubian Archer (replaces archer), Archer of the Eyes (replaces longbowman), Nubian Camel Raider (replaces knight)
                                "When we begin to regulate, there is naming,
                                but when there has been naming
                                we should also know when to stop.
                                Only by knowing when to stop can we avoid danger." - Lao-zi, the "Dao-de-jing"

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X