Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

BC 4000 (Thread Structure)

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • #1

    BC 4000 (Thread Structure)

    What about this structure:

    [BC/AD] [date] [(subject)]

    for a thread topic (see for an example this topic) to keep things fresh and actual during the game ..? Like for threads that need a decision / discussion during the =current= turn (or very shortly thereafter).

    Examples:

    BC 4000 (Interior)
    Where shall we found our first city?

    AD 700 (Foreign)
    The Legoland Team asks for peace - shall we accept?

    This way, you'll always know that a thread is out-of-date, or needs immediate attention.

    The more strategic issues can be resolved in 'normal' threads.
    Greatest moments in cat:
    __________________
    "Miaooow..!"
    Tags: None
  • #2
    Looks good. Well organized threads can make this a lot better for us.

    Comment

    • #3
      Great idea BFM!!! Now if only we could find a Foreign minister....
      "If you're not having fun, then you're losing the game."-Copyright Warrior Poet 11/18/2002 "No plan survives first contact with the enemy."-Tsun Tzu -Don't know when B.C.

      Comment

      • #4



        BTW: We should have an ambassador in each country too...

        Comment

        • #5
          I would wager that the Foreign Minister's "advisors" would essentially become ambassadors and/or intelligence specialists for the other civs...That would be up to whomever the Foreign Minister is...
          "If you're not having fun, then you're losing the game."-Copyright Warrior Poet 11/18/2002 "No plan survives first contact with the enemy."-Tsun Tzu -Don't know when B.C.

          Comment

          • #6
            Originally posted by WarriorPoet
            I would wager that the Foreign Minister's "advisors" would essentially become ambassadors and/or intelligence specialists for the other civs...That would be up to whomever the Foreign Minister is...
            I concur. Foreign Minister should supervise all diplomats. He CAN be a diplomat himself if he wants to, but we should stick to appointing some other member to a) lighten the minister's load and b) give the member's more involvement
            :-p

            Comment

            • #7
              I don't think we have enough members to cover all of the other teams with diplomat spots... We barely have enough active ones to cover the necassary ones...

              Comment

              • #8
                Originally posted by Trip
                I don't think we have enough members to cover all of the other teams with diplomat spots... We barely have enough active ones to cover the necassary ones...
                True... we don't need diplomats in while anyway. Maybe in a couple of months we meed the first civ on the map... One thing I've also noted when playing boardgames with about 8 players is that the player who keeps the lowest profile and stays out of pacts/agreements often is the most successful.

                Comment

                • #9
                  *bump*
                  Please use this structure to indicate the importance of your thread in relevance to the game date!
                  Greatest moments in cat:
                  __________________
                  "Miaooow..!"

                  Comment

                  Previous template Next
                  Working...
                  X