Tweet
The way i see the executive branch being filled is:
1) The nominees for any ministrial (or presidancy) post can come from any school, so that everyone gets a chance to serve as any minister. elections are held every 50 days (or anything else between 1-2 months). Minister are the team members who serve as the executive branch that have the real auothrity in the game (and perhaps even outside the game- as far as foreign affairs goes, but that is to be discussed)
2) The 3 Scholas each has a leader- his role is to supervise the discussions and other efforts of his school members, the leader is chosen by the scholars of his schools. He is to recieve reports and keep his ears close to the ground. He is to compile reports of the works of his school, and make sure the appropriate minister(s) recieve these reprts and take them into consideration.
He must also make sure his scholars are notified of the precise actions taken by the minister who are relevant to his schola's field of study.
3) The schola leaders themselves are checked by the school members, who are able to impeach a leader if he fails to act upon the prinicipals stated above.
I should also add, that any minister should be encouraged to choose deputies from the appropriate school, and that no minister could
IMO, this outline of principals combines some of the ideas that were raised here, and i think serves both interests of those who favor schola oriented administration, and also those who see the two bodies (schola and executive branch) as sepertaed entities.
1) The nominees for any ministrial (or presidancy) post can come from any school, so that everyone gets a chance to serve as any minister. elections are held every 50 days (or anything else between 1-2 months). Minister are the team members who serve as the executive branch that have the real auothrity in the game (and perhaps even outside the game- as far as foreign affairs goes, but that is to be discussed)
2) The 3 Scholas each has a leader- his role is to supervise the discussions and other efforts of his school members, the leader is chosen by the scholars of his schools. He is to recieve reports and keep his ears close to the ground. He is to compile reports of the works of his school, and make sure the appropriate minister(s) recieve these reprts and take them into consideration.
He must also make sure his scholars are notified of the precise actions taken by the minister who are relevant to his schola's field of study.
3) The schola leaders themselves are checked by the school members, who are able to impeach a leader if he fails to act upon the prinicipals stated above.
I should also add, that any minister should be encouraged to choose deputies from the appropriate school, and that no minister could
IMO, this outline of principals combines some of the ideas that were raised here, and i think serves both interests of those who favor schola oriented administration, and also those who see the two bodies (schola and executive branch) as sepertaed entities.
It means a bit more work, but one person (or 1 person with a volunteer deputy) will eventually have a better idea of the overall situation than if there were 5 or 6 guys running around doing diplomatic missions....
Comment