TURN 310 AD
I've been meaning to move us toward the ISDG way of setting up the turn threads, but...
New Format for GS' Lately Developed Style:
[Major headers to be shifted in order according to their importance on a given turn; intent is to cover the high notes.]
THE NORTH
Prep for an attack, tbd, on Bob. This means getting ALL (sorry for the past turn's mistake) of the 8 Galleys ready at Beta4. If memory serves, we should be capable of loading appr. 12 Knights and 4 Pikes. BTW, this means transit without an empty Galley for defensive cover.
The Galleys will be in position to move to one of two tiles on the following turn: 1) directly to a mountain landing threatening YK, or 2) the central northern sea (?ocean?) tile that provides access to both the YK mountain and a eastern hills attack on ND. This can be decided later, but plays into our politicking.
Note: An alternative would be to prep slowmovers for an attack on northern Bob, and move all fastmovers to the south. I am against this for a number of reasons, chief being our transportation constraint in the south.
THE SOUTH
More Galleys. A MM-master's plan for Galley transit of fastmovers and other units to Bob. Some MM re building.
10-12 Knights to Alamo 63.
The ND Galleys: I may be crazy, but I think it's a feint... no way they'd have 6 AWs tied up that long. I say risk it, and focus on transitting units from Stormia to Bob... maintain coastal forces to deal with it if I'm wrong.
Empty Sirocco to draw in the enemy... OH, HUMANS!!
ALLIES
F*ck, I don;t know how to respond to the idea of RP pulling an Alamo at Pamplona ( ). Ideas?
DIPLOMACY
I have floated an idea in the GoW thread: RP to North Stormia, GoW and GS take down ND, and then follow with a joint attack on Lego. Don't know the denoument. Ideas?
ECONOMY AND SCIENCE
Someone needs to take a look at MMing Stormia.
Also, I am very uncomfortable just not researching... Ideas?
____________
As Neo said on the rooftop:
HELP??!!
I've been meaning to move us toward the ISDG way of setting up the turn threads, but...
New Format for GS' Lately Developed Style:
[Major headers to be shifted in order according to their importance on a given turn; intent is to cover the high notes.]
THE NORTH
Prep for an attack, tbd, on Bob. This means getting ALL (sorry for the past turn's mistake) of the 8 Galleys ready at Beta4. If memory serves, we should be capable of loading appr. 12 Knights and 4 Pikes. BTW, this means transit without an empty Galley for defensive cover.
The Galleys will be in position to move to one of two tiles on the following turn: 1) directly to a mountain landing threatening YK, or 2) the central northern sea (?ocean?) tile that provides access to both the YK mountain and a eastern hills attack on ND. This can be decided later, but plays into our politicking.
Note: An alternative would be to prep slowmovers for an attack on northern Bob, and move all fastmovers to the south. I am against this for a number of reasons, chief being our transportation constraint in the south.
THE SOUTH
More Galleys. A MM-master's plan for Galley transit of fastmovers and other units to Bob. Some MM re building.
10-12 Knights to Alamo 63.
The ND Galleys: I may be crazy, but I think it's a feint... no way they'd have 6 AWs tied up that long. I say risk it, and focus on transitting units from Stormia to Bob... maintain coastal forces to deal with it if I'm wrong.
Empty Sirocco to draw in the enemy... OH, HUMANS!!
ALLIES
F*ck, I don;t know how to respond to the idea of RP pulling an Alamo at Pamplona ( ). Ideas?
DIPLOMACY
I have floated an idea in the GoW thread: RP to North Stormia, GoW and GS take down ND, and then follow with a joint attack on Lego. Don't know the denoument. Ideas?
ECONOMY AND SCIENCE
Someone needs to take a look at MMing Stormia.
Also, I am very uncomfortable just not researching... Ideas?
____________
As Neo said on the rooftop:
HELP??!!
Comment