Trade Session Two

[=OttomusCeasar=]

Originally posted by Nuclear Master
Blech. I missed it.

I wouldn't worry. It just means all the stuff sold this turn won't flood the market and lower the price of the stuff sold next turn. I found that out the hard way in the GF's $MoneyGame.

[General Locus]

Option 3. Let's do it over. Furthermore, I think w should be doing these turn sessions on a 72 hour basis

[mrmitchell]

Gen Loc

[Esoteric]

What is the plan here? Are we going to continue trading soon?

[General Locus]

Sad to say, I think that everyone....or at least many... lost interest because it seemed to be a bit too complicated...

[TORARADICAL]

Well, I am still very much willing to be involved.

[Esoteric]

Then let's reopen trading session 2 and see how it goes.

GF- If you feel that as the Feudal system creator it is inappropriate for you to run the trading sessions as well, let me know. I think that perhaps we could use some form of citizen council- say maybe two or three people willing to operate the trading sessions. I would be happy to help, and as we get the automated version done (or minimally functional) we can switch over to it.

In the mean time- let's trade!!

Should the guild prices for goods stand?

Also note the new cities- and people with higher income due to more tiles.

Not to mention the new trading opportunities that came from gaining Horseback Riding.

[QUOTE]So we now have Horseback Riding? That would mean landowners in X can trade with any city other than the new Feudality suburb.
SO:
Feudality landtiles can trade in Feudality, Costa Brava, and X.
Costa Brava landtiles can trade in Costa Brava and Feudality.
Asylum landtiles can trade in The Asylum, Sanatorium, and X.
Sanatorium landtiles can trade in Sanatorium, The Asylum, X, and the Gates of X.
Gates of X landtiles can trade in Gates of X, X, and the Sanatorium.
X landtiles can trade in X, Gates of X, The Asylum, Sanatorium, and Feudality.
[\QUOTE]
edit: Ummm...quotes not work right. Ghengis Farb is being quoted, and I think he got it right.

[ZargonX]

Yes, let's just start a new trading session and move on from there...

[GhengisFarbâ„¢]

I see two general options.

1) Do two over with the guild prices the cities had agree to and keep in open for 72 hours.

2) Let the cities vote on new Guild Prices (appears to take about a week or more to determine) and run Session 2 with those prices and the new cities.

[TORARADICAL]

And why can we not just count the Trade Session 2 we already did?

[GhengisFarbâ„¢]

Originally posted by TORARADICAL
And why can we not just count the Trade Session 2 we already did?

I have no problem with that but the overwhelming majority seems to be against it.

[General Locus]

Like the next president of the United States of America, I am going to flip flop. I actually voted for doing it over, before I voted against it . My reason being is that I thought we would be able to do it all over before the next set of turns had been played. Due to an extremely high degree of apathy, that never happened, so I think, now, that we should go with what we had done previously, at this point.

[Esoteric]

I tend to agree that time has overtaken the trade session 2, and we can let it stand and move to session 3 because many things have changed already.

Does anyone have a totals list for the end of session 2 handy?

[Jonny]

It's time to let trade session 2 stand and just move on...

[Aeson]

Any of the complaints I had against session 2 were for future consideration. Most of the problems would be exacerbated by replaying it (players not knowing they have to redo things outweighs players not knowing they had 24 less hours IMO), and fix very little.

I have no problems with letting the Session stand.