Tweet
So is everyone in agreement on 72 hour trading periods?
-
-
yepComment
-
Yes.
So, is this session standing?Sent by Him,
Prince TORARADICAL of The MAELRI
Creator and High Administrator of Noitazilivic--Home of the first cIV DGame, the first Warlords DGame, and the first BTS DGameComment
-
Let's let this session stand, change to 72, and get started on session 3!Comment
-
I say redo it, just to be different
*"Winning is still the goal, and we cannot win if we lose (gawd, that was brilliant - you can quote me on that if you want. And con - I don't want to see that in your sig."- BetaComment
-
Bah-!
Somebody trade something already, dammit,
Hey conmcb25- how do you get that Arnelos visits counter in your signature to work?Before Enlightenment: Chop Wood, Carry Water.
After Enlightenment: Chop Wood, Carry Water.
I reserve the right to speak gibberish in public, to embarass myself as a Senator, and to generally ignore the Bananis Imperialis; assumed competent. The Decadence that was Rome scoffs, I stand in the Bacchanalian temples laughing.Comment
-
Yes to 72 hour sessions.Comment
-
It would be good to have a limitation on trade sessions in the future, but because there was no rule and people like me who were late with trade orders this time, should not be disadvantaged by suddenly applying a new rule on this trade session, because there was no time limit when it started.
Aidun"Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement. For even the very wise can not see all ends." - J.R.R. Tolkien, The Fellowship of the Ring.
Term 9 and 10 Domestic Minister of the C3DG I., Term 8 Regional Governor of Old Persia in the C3DG and proud citizen of Apolyton. Royal Ambassador to Legoland in the C3 PTW DG, Foreign Affairs Minister and King of the United Kingdom in the MZO C3CDG and leader of the Monarchist Imperialist team. Moody Sir Aidun (The Impatient) of the Holy Templar Order in the C4BtSDGComment
-
I'm pretty sure all of the trade sessions had a 72 hour time limit. Except the last one which had a 48 hour one.
I think 72 hour sessions staggered by 12 hours (One starts at say 1200 GMT, ends 72 hours later at 1159 GMT, then the next one starts 12 hours later at 2400 GMT and lasts 72 hours, etc.) thus no one should be too disadvantaged due to timezone since they every other one would stagger with the previous one.Comment
-
Wow. Err, are you guys still trading or is it time for orders and PLAY?Comment
-
don't really know if this is going anywhere....
it's a nice idea, but it just seemed to be a little too complicated...Comment
-
Comment
-
Some of us would like to give it a go, and are working on consolidating the rules, and figuring oot an automated system to keep track of the trading and ownership and such. I'll let y'all know, when we get it all ready.Sent by Him,
Prince TORARADICAL of The MAELRI
Creator and High Administrator of Noitazilivic--Home of the first cIV DGame, the first Warlords DGame, and the first BTS DGameComment
-
shall we bury this beast???Comment
-
I manually calculated it every morning.Originally posted by Esoteric
Hey conmcb25- how do you get that Arnelos visits counter in your signature to work?
I sent Arnelos a PM which he has yet to open, and then checked his last log in time via the PM tracking screen.
Its kind of a back door way to track when someone was last online
Is this one dead? Should we just start up a new Demo game or continue this one as a normal game.
I wanted to participate but didn't have neough time this summer to follow ev erything that was going on due to some personnal issues, and work has really sucked this summer.*"Winning is still the goal, and we cannot win if we lose (gawd, that was brilliant - you can quote me on that if you want. And con - I don't want to see that in your sig."- BetaComment
Comment