Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Senate Bill: Enabeling legislation for Persian campaign

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Senate Bill: Enabeling legislation for Persian campaign

    Senate Bill: Enabeling the Persian campaign


    Shall the Senate pass a resolution authorizing the FM to make a RoP agreement with Greece, and assuming diplomatic success, issue a Declaration of War against Persia.

    The discussion thread is located at:





    -edited redundant material

    Ssgt roadcage (retired)
    36
    Yea
    50.00%
    18
    Nay
    50.00%
    18
    Abstain
    0.00%
    0

    The poll is expired.

    Last edited by roadcage; February 4, 2003, 13:49.
    I used to be a builder. That was before I played Civ III

  • #2
    Yea.
    RIAA sucks
    The Optimistas
    I'm a political cartoonist

    Comment


    • #3
      Yes, I finally got it. I know what the problem was, I was previewing instead of posting the Poll. On the lookout for a few large trout

      This legislative stuff is so new to me. In RL all I have to do is write a white paper for my boss.
      I used to be a builder. That was before I played Civ III

      Comment


      • #4
        Yea.
        "Close your eyes, for your eyes will only tell the truth,
        And the truth isn't what you want to see,
        Close your eyes, and let music set you free..."
        - Phantom of the Opera

        Comment


        • #5
          Persia: Sure, won't slow down Hospital builds or other needed improvements.

          We won't even need settlers for this:
          Neither of the Persian cities can be moved without the territory becoming Greek.

          (Persia seems to have previously lost Sidon to the Aztecs and it's other northern city to the English.)

          I also noted that the Greeks now own Centralia. (Possible cultural flip?)
          Last edited by joncnunn; February 3, 2003, 15:52.
          1st C3DG Term 7 Science Advisor 1st C3DG Term 8 Domestic Minister
          Templar Science Minister
          AI: I sure wish Jon would hurry up and complete his turn, he's been at it for over 1,200,000 milliseconds now.

          Comment


          • #6
            There is no reason for this wanton violence! I draw the line here! No more reckless war!
            "The Enrichment Center is required to inform you that you will be baked, and then there will be cake"
            Former President, C3SPDGI

            Comment


            • #7
              Hmm... this gets us oil and saltpeter (in other words, it gets us an oil) and brings the last of Persia into Apolytonia. Without delaying infrastructure.

              Comment


              • #8
                Roleplay

                For what purpose does the Gentleman from Texas rise?

                Mr President, I rise to thank my most renound builder colleagues from Texas and Maryland. I rejoice that we can join hands across the isle when our interests are aligned.

                We take this action not as a wanton act of destruction, but rather to harvest a just reward for the memory of those brave swords and knights that paid the highest price on the plains of Presopolis so very long ago.

                I reach across the isle to the Gentleman from Conneticut and ask him to please reconsider and join us as we commit to complete their grand task.
                I used to be a builder. That was before I played Civ III

                Comment


                • #9
                  Our armed forces are ready, mobile, and anxious to keep themselves busy.

                  I vote
                  Former Supreme Military Commander of the Democratic Apolyton States, Term 8
                  Former Chairman of Apolyton Labor Party

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Nay

                    Not because I care about Persia, but because I believe the signing of a RoP agreement to be a mistake. The esteemed members of the Senate should recall what happened the LAST TIME we signed a RoP agreement with one of our neighbors... Indeed, Persia comes to mind.

                    I'd rather not make the same mistake when railroads give a potential foe such unlimited access to our empire.
                    Long-time poster on Apolyton and WePlayCiv
                    Consul of Apolyton from the 1st Civ3 Inter-Site Democracy Game (ISDG)
                    7th President of Apolyton in the 1st Civ3 Democracy Game

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Arnelos
                      Nay

                      Not because I care about Persia, but because I believe the signing of a RoP agreement to be a mistake. The esteemed members of the Senate should recall what happened the LAST TIME we signed a RoP agreement with one of our neighbors... Indeed, Persia comes to mind.

                      I'd rather not make the same mistake when railroads give a potential foe such unlimited access to our empire.
                      Ditto.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        what did happen the last time we had an ROP? (I hadn't joined then)
                        Proud Member of the ISDG Apolyton Team; Member #2 in the Apolyton Yact Club.
                        King of Trafalgar and Lord of all Isolationia in the Civ III PTW Glory of War team.
                        ---------
                        May God Bless.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Panzer32
                          what did happen the last time we had an ROP? (I hadn't joined then)
                          Persia used the RoP to invade our territory and surprise attack us behind our front lines.

                          Had we had railroads, they could have taken Apolyton itself for all we know...

                          Thankfully, we did NOT have railroads and were able to first beat off the Persian invaders and EVENTUALLY (though it took quite some time) invade Persia due to the good work of then SMC Aggie and those assisting with the war planning.

                          Signing a RoP with an industrialized AI civ while our entire territory has railroads has the potential to be an unmitigated disaster. Unlike Persia that didn't even have a source of iron until they were nearly dead, Greece has a modern army and would probably use it.
                          Long-time poster on Apolyton and WePlayCiv
                          Consul of Apolyton from the 1st Civ3 Inter-Site Democracy Game (ISDG)
                          7th President of Apolyton in the 1st Civ3 Democracy Game

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            NO ROP, it is unnecessary and could cause huge problems. Remember the Persia ROP.
                            Aggie
                            The 5th President, 2nd SMC and 8th VP in the Civ3 Demogame. Also proud member of the GOW team in the PTW game. Peace through superior firepower.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              But maybe we don't need any RoP.

                              We can take Samaria in three turns, I think.. E-Town will expand the cultural border in three turns, too. So, we can take Samaria and still connected with the rest of Empire, after the downsizing of the cultural border. Btw, there's no another spot to found a city closest to Hamadan, we should keep Samaria. Our workers will be able to railroad the city.

                              From there, we can launch an assault to Hamadan without even touch the greek soil (am I right?); more 3 turns to take the city...
                              So, 6 (maybe 7) turns to take the last Persian city.

                              Hmmm... Well, I'm a lousy strategist... One of you, guys (Mesh? Aggie? roadcage?) certainly can think in a better plan. Could you make this in 5 turns? And how much 6 turns can affect happiness, the WLPDs and the approval rate?

                              NOTE:
                              I completely agree with Arnelos and Aggie, no RoP. But this doesn't means no war.
                              Last edited by Aro; February 3, 2003, 22:20.
                              RIAA sucks
                              The Optimistas
                              I'm a political cartoonist

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X