Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Senate Bill: Shall Seti be used to relocate the Palace to Macross City?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by GhengisFarb
    I do that all the time, usually by the time I've hit the Industrial Age I've got 6-8 empty armies sitting around.

    Armies of Modern Armor are soooo sweet, with their 3 movement points and their blitz ability.

    Existing cavalry can be used to generate more GL's. The first units to go into the army should be the ones that have already generated a GL and therefore cannot do so again.
    My thoughts exactly.
    "Close your eyes, for your eyes will only tell the truth,
    And the truth isn't what you want to see,
    Close your eyes, and let music set you free..."
    - Phantom of the Opera

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by roadcage
      If we do not 'enable' Ferropolis and it's IW, we will be lucky to have any Army shells available before Tanks.

      It is unbelievable that the rp junkies have managed to sink this bill.

      SHAME SHAME SHAME
      Don't jump on us, you're the people who built the Ironworks way off in the boonies from our capital, it's not like Hamburg wasn't closer...........

      Comment


      • #48
        I might point out that until the final disposition of Seti is determined, the game shall not move forward. If you have another use, please state such.

        GK
        If you're interested in participating in the first Civ 5 Community Game then please visit: http://www.weplayciv.com/forums/forum.php

        Comment


        • #49
          Looking at the 1305 AD map, I couldn't find a town named Hamburg anywhere.

          I also didn't see any city in our empire with both Iron & Coal within it's City Radius other than the city currently building the Iron Works.

          Originally posted by GhengisFarb

          Don't jump on us, you're the people who built the Ironworks way off in the boonies from our capital, it's not like Hamburg wasn't closer...........
          1st C3DG Term 7 Science Advisor 1st C3DG Term 8 Domestic Minister
          Templar Science Minister
          AI: I sure wish Jon would hurry up and complete his turn, he's been at it for over 1,200,000 milliseconds now.

          Comment


          • #50
            If this bill fails, our next best option is to use Seti on an Army, and hope for another GL to also use for an army.
            It then wouldn't matter what city we build the MA in because it's only value would be culture.

            I'm not sure if empty Army shells count towards the 3 that allows construction of the Pentagon (mostly for the culture).

            Originally posted by GodKing
            I might point out that until the final disposition of Seti is determined, the game shall not move forward. If you have another use, please state such.

            GK
            1st C3DG Term 7 Science Advisor 1st C3DG Term 8 Domestic Minister
            Templar Science Minister
            AI: I sure wish Jon would hurry up and complete his turn, he's been at it for over 1,200,000 milliseconds now.

            Comment


            • #51
              Sorry joncnunn, a significant fraction of the no votes stated that they supported the palace move but wanted more info before picking the city.

              There is no way that a majority of our players will select one Army for Seti.

              The Warmongers will insist on enabling Ferropolis to make LOTS of Armies. 1 every 3 turns starting in about 1390 or so

              This pragmatist (and maybe a few others) just want to get a screenshot of a size 12 city building a Factory from scratch in 3 turns.

              The peacenicks will insist on no Armies

              Those 3 groups constitute over 90% of our player base.


              Ssgt roadcage (retired)
              I used to be a builder. That was before I played Civ III

              Comment


              • #52
                As we near closer and closer to the end of the game (we're not even in modern times yet folks, but still) I sense there is going to be continued dispute over how to go about winning it. It could get pretty ugly...
                Former Supreme Military Commander of the Democratic Apolyton States, Term 8
                Former Chairman of Apolyton Labor Party

                Comment


                • #53
                  I propose that we move forward in the game, it is unfortunate that we can not agree. However the game must no be held hostage to such disputes. I propose we move forward now.
                  Aggie
                  The 5th President, 2nd SMC and 8th VP in the Civ3 Demogame. Also proud member of the GOW team in the PTW game. Peace through superior firepower.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by Aggie
                    I propose that we move forward in the game, it is unfortunate that we can not agree. However the game must no be held hostage to such disputes. I propose we move forward now.
                    Aggie
                    I agree. Anything we do with Seti would only take place several turns from now anyways, so why delay the game? Good call Aggie.
                    Former Supreme Military Commander of the Democratic Apolyton States, Term 8
                    Former Chairman of Apolyton Labor Party

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      Just what I've been trying to do for the last several postings about this.

                      E_T
                      Come and see me at WePlayCiv
                      Worship the Comic here!
                      Term IV DFM for Trade, Term V CP & Term VI DM, Term VII SMC of Apolytonia - SPDGI, Minister of the Interior of the PTW InterSite Demo Game

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by Aggie
                        I propose that we move forward in the game, it is unfortunate that we can not agree. However the game must no be held hostage to such disputes. I propose we move forward now.
                        Aggie
                        We do agree to the need to use the GL before any more combat with Elites. Converting him to an army will allow the army to be disbanded (contributing massive shields to any construction project) and still allow us to generate more GLs.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          As E_T pointed out, we have to hold him for two turns anyway if we go with a palace.

                          Since it looks like this bill is failing, perhaps we should put forth a bill stating Seti will be used for a palace somewhere in two turns, and the government should play those two turns whether or not the exact location is ironed out.

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Originally posted by Kloreep
                            As E_T pointed out, we have to hold him for two turns anyway if we go with a palace.

                            Since it looks like this bill is failing, perhaps we should put forth a bill stating Seti will be used for a palace somewhere in two turns, and the government should play those two turns whether or not the exact location is ironed out.
                            Only if NO ELITE unit is used in combat for those turns.

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Keeping Seti around for several turns denies us getting additional Great Leaders regardless of weather we use Elites in combat or not.

                              If we had just built Tanks, getting lots of Vetran tans into Elites would be okay, but it's not the time to be promting Vet Calvary into Elite Calvary; our Elite Calvary should be producing GLs.

                              Originally posted by Meshelic

                              I agree. Anything we do with Seti would only take place several turns from now anyways, so why delay the game? Good call Aggie.
                              1st C3DG Term 7 Science Advisor 1st C3DG Term 8 Domestic Minister
                              Templar Science Minister
                              AI: I sure wish Jon would hurry up and complete his turn, he's been at it for over 1,200,000 milliseconds now.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by Kloreep
                                As E_T pointed out, we have to hold him for two turns anyway if we go with a palace.

                                Since it looks like this bill is failing, perhaps we should put forth a bill stating Seti will be used for a palace somewhere in two turns, and the government should play those two turns whether or not the exact location is ironed out.
                                Tempus Fugit...

                                E_T
                                Come and see me at WePlayCiv
                                Worship the Comic here!
                                Term IV DFM for Trade, Term V CP & Term VI DM, Term VII SMC of Apolytonia - SPDGI, Minister of the Interior of the PTW InterSite Demo Game

                                Comment

                                Working...