Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Science Advisory: Do we want Tanks or Bombers first?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Science Advisory: Do we want Tanks or Bombers first?

    In a few turns we will complete the Theory of Evolution and be granted Electronics and Radio for free.

    By that time, there is a good chance the AI will have finished reseraching Steel so we can directly reserach Combustion.

    After Combustion though, there is a choice between Flight (Fighters, BOMBERS, and Air Ports) and Mass Production (Battleships, Carriers, and leads to Mobile Warfare for TANKS).

    In the first case, we get Flight 4 turns after Combustion completes, the first Airport built 2 or 3 turns later with the first Bomber 2 or 3 turns after that.

    In the second case, we get Mobilie Warfare 8 turns after the completion of Combustion, with the first Tank in 2 or 3 more turns.

    Which do we want first?
    37
    Discover Flight ASAP
    8.11%
    3
    Discover Mobile Warfare ASAP
    89.19%
    33
    Only Banana Knows which to discover first
    2.70%
    1

    The poll is expired.

    Last edited by joncnunn; December 30, 2002, 17:30.
    1st C3DG Term 7 Science Advisor 1st C3DG Term 8 Domestic Minister
    Templar Science Minister
    AI: I sure wish Jon would hurry up and complete his turn, he's been at it for over 1,200,000 milliseconds now.

  • #2
    In my own games, I put off Flight for as long as possible, but that's because I always build the Colossus which also expires with Flight.

    But since we don't have the Colosus in this game, it's not so clear weather Bombers or Tanks would be more useful.
    1st C3DG Term 7 Science Advisor 1st C3DG Term 8 Domestic Minister
    Templar Science Minister
    AI: I sure wish Jon would hurry up and complete his turn, he's been at it for over 1,200,000 milliseconds now.

    Comment


    • #3
      tanks...... duhhhhhhhh
      If you're interested in participating in the first Civ 5 Community Game then please visit: http://www.weplayciv.com/forums/forum.php

      Comment


      • #4
        *BIG sigh*

        manually add +1 to discover Mobile Warfare ASAP

        duh

        Comment


        • #5
          You can't put bombers in an Army
          I used to be a builder. That was before I played Civ III

          Comment


          • #6
            Ok, ok, I know you were all waiting for me to return to give you advice on this one. Well, it is a toughie, but I would say mobile warfare. Of course, you don't have to listen to me.... ah, good. You obviously did.
            "The Enrichment Center is required to inform you that you will be baked, and then there will be cake"
            Former President, C3SPDGI

            Comment


            • #7
              Arty seems to be working fine, so Mobile Warfare.

              Comment


              • #8
                Our ground armies could do with new techniques. Flight is not yet needed. Bombers can't occupy an enemy city, tanks can. Weakening units in cities can also be done with the huge artillery regiment we have. We don't need bombers for that.
                With battleships we could make coast bombardments when we would decide to attack the Zulus or the Romans.
                I vote for tanks.

                Aidun
                "Many that live deserve death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in judgement. For even the very wise can not see all ends." - J.R.R. Tolkien, The Fellowship of the Ring.
                Term 9 and 10 Domestic Minister of the C3DG I., Term 8 Regional Governor of Old Persia in the C3DG and proud citizen of Apolyton. Royal Ambassador to Legoland in the C3 PTW DG, Foreign Affairs Minister and King of the United Kingdom in the MZO C3CDG and leader of the Monarchist Imperialist team. Moody Sir Aidun (The Impatient) of the Holy Templar Order in the C4BtSDG

                Comment


                • #9
                  Bombers can do what our artillery is already doing, only that they have greater range, but they require an airport to base in. All in all, bombers are better than artillery in some points and weaker in others.
                  However, tanks are wholly different from cavalry. They are much stronger and they blitz, and although they're slower than cavalry, they certainly make up for it with all of their tactical advantages. I vote motorized transportation!
                  "Close your eyes, for your eyes will only tell the truth,
                  And the truth isn't what you want to see,
                  Close your eyes, and let music set you free..."
                  - Phantom of the Opera

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I almost always get Flight last, but I also have the Colossus. Both have their Good & bad points. But it all comes down to what can be done with this version Patch, compaired to later Versions.

                    Bombers (and other Flight Capable Units) are hampered by somethings that were fixed in 1.29 & PTW. Where as, Tanks aren't.

                    So my vote is tanks first. It won't be much longer until we have the other tech.

                    E_T
                    Come and see me at WePlayCiv
                    Worship the Comic here!
                    Term IV DFM for Trade, Term V CP & Term VI DM, Term VII SMC of Apolytonia - SPDGI, Minister of the Interior of the PTW InterSite Demo Game

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Tanks! Hundreds of them! Thousands!
                      RIAA sucks
                      The Optimistas
                      I'm a political cartoonist

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Actually, bombers don't require an airport to make bombing runs IIRC. Airports are just air barracks and air harbors.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Science Advisory updated to reflect overwhelming desire for Tanks first.

                          Well, Bombers can be built without an Airport, but that makes them merely Regulars instead of Vetrans so I always build Airports first.
                          1st C3DG Term 7 Science Advisor 1st C3DG Term 8 Domestic Minister
                          Templar Science Minister
                          AI: I sure wish Jon would hurry up and complete his turn, he's been at it for over 1,200,000 milliseconds now.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            What's the point of veteran air units? Hit points have no effect on aircraft IIRC, because they either get shot down or they don't, they don't just lose hit points.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              They do when an aircraft performing an air superiority mission attacks another aircraft... I think.
                              Anyway, for a while most cities will not have or will not be able to build SAM sites. During that period, the AI's only defense against our air bombing runs will be fighters performing superiority missions.
                              The same goes for us of course, so we better build veteran air units if we want our units to survive or properly defend against AI planes.
                              "Close your eyes, for your eyes will only tell the truth,
                              And the truth isn't what you want to see,
                              Close your eyes, and let music set you free..."
                              - Phantom of the Opera

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X