Well, the AI lost a swarm of Calvary to my Infenty a couple of nights ago in my own game.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Science Advisory: Do we want Tanks or Bombers first?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by skywalker
Panag - give it up. You're wrong.
Btw, bombers CAN'T KILL ANYTHING, so they aren't too useful defending an island. We have artillery.
no crap , cant they , ..... oh what a shame , ......
they are the best when it comes to defense , imagine we had some in our wars now , we could bomb the crap out of them and then move in with great ease , ....
unlike now , .....
and the AI tends to redraw his seaunits when they are damaged , thus therfore returning its invasion force and buying time , .... and at the same time we could recon the areas that lay around us , .......
artillery has a shorter range and less effect in some cases
have a nice day- RES NON VERBA - DE OPRESSO LIBER - VERITAS ET LIBERTAS - O TOLMON NIKA - SINE PARI - VIGLIA PRETIUM LIBERTAS - SI VIS PACEM , PARA BELLUM -
- LEGIO PATRIA NOSTRA - one shot , one kill - freedom exists only in a book - everything you always wanted to know about special forces - everything you always wanted to know about Israel - what Dabur does in his free time , ... - in french - “Become an anti-Semitic teacher for 5 Euro only.”
WHY DOES ISRAEL NEED A SECURITY FENCE --- join in an exceptional demo game > join here forum is now open ! - the new civ Conquest screenshots > go see them UPDATED 07.11.2003 ISRAEL > crisis or challenge ?
Comment
-
If we owned the continent, yes flight would be a better option. With airports on all major cities, each city can instantly transfer a unit onto a zulu foothold city if we had one, therefore we can keep expansion flowing.
Since this isnt the case, airport's value is somehwta less. We have railroad so we dont need airport of the most part. Airport still does give economical bonus and you get bombers by inventing flight, but artillery can do a job, although not as quickly as bomber.
Unless we are planning to attack the zulus anytime soon, I'd say go for tanks. There's no point going for zulus when we have plenty of room to expand right here in our own continent.
In addition, Panag is right. You can use bombers as defense. If you bomb the sh*t out of AI units they retreat. (AI never attacks with red health units):-p
Comment
-
Originally posted by Calc II
If we owned the continent, yes flight would be a better option. With airports on all major cities, each city can instantly transfer a unit onto a zulu foothold city if we had one, therefore we can keep expansion flowing.
Since this isnt the case, airport's value is somehwta less. We have railroad so we dont need airport of the most part. Airport still does give economical bonus and you get bombers by inventing flight, but artillery can do a job, although not as quickly as bomber.
Unless we are planning to attack the zulus anytime soon, I'd say go for tanks. There's no point going for zulus when we have plenty of room to expand right here in our own continent.
In addition, Panag is right. You can use bombers as defense. If you bomb the sh*t out of AI units they retreat. (AI never attacks with red health units)
even now we can control whatever we want , its the boys from the other side of the ocean we should look at , ....
we shall have plenty of time to get tanks later , ....
have a nice day- RES NON VERBA - DE OPRESSO LIBER - VERITAS ET LIBERTAS - O TOLMON NIKA - SINE PARI - VIGLIA PRETIUM LIBERTAS - SI VIS PACEM , PARA BELLUM -
- LEGIO PATRIA NOSTRA - one shot , one kill - freedom exists only in a book - everything you always wanted to know about special forces - everything you always wanted to know about Israel - what Dabur does in his free time , ... - in french - “Become an anti-Semitic teacher for 5 Euro only.”
WHY DOES ISRAEL NEED A SECURITY FENCE --- join in an exceptional demo game > join here forum is now open ! - the new civ Conquest screenshots > go see them UPDATED 07.11.2003 ISRAEL > crisis or challenge ?
Comment
Comment