Confirmation of panag as VP

[Shiber]

Originally posted by panag
panag > continues to plant trees for clean air

Some politicians prefer to kiss babies, but it has been said before than you do things your own way, so I guess it's ok.

[E_T]

I almost voted, but I'll wait one more day.

E_T

[Meshelic]

Glad to see THAT over with.

Was like an Israeli civil war in here for a second.

Chairman Meshelic

[Shiber]

I don't like to admit it but most Israelis are rude.
Maybe some day Firaxis will decide to make a "Hebrews" civ. I can only imagine how the Civilopedia entry would look like.
"The Hebrews are rude and militaristic. Their Unique Unit is the Panag."

(I'm joking about the Panag reference of course. You know, it's really sad that you can't use humor in here anymore without having some people pointing blaming fingers at you and taking personal offense. Yes, you know who I mean)

[Meshelic]

Well yes I agree, Israelis as a whole have a distinctive type of rudeness, but I think it more has to do with the fact that Israelis are very methodical, analytical and come off sounding more mean-spirited than they really are.

I plan to name one of my units "the panag" in my SP games... don't worry, panag, it'll be a good unit.

[GhengisFarbâ„¢]

[QUOTE] Originally posted by Shiber
"The Hebrews are rude and militaristic. Their Unique Unit is the Panag."
QUOTE]
What benefits does the Rude trait confer? And their UU should still be the "Wrath of God" I put in my scenario not the panag.

[joncnunn]

I'm thinking that the Isreali civ would be religious & militaristic, no UU but have the following charaterstics:

1. Prior to them discovering Polythesim, all Isreali units fight with doubled atack and defense points.
(Warriors : 2/2/1, Archers : 4/2/1, SpearMen : 2/4/1, Swordmen : 6/4/1, Chariots : 2/2/2, Horse Men : 4/2/2)

2. When the Isrealis discover Polytheism, all their units fights with halved attack and defense points until they discover Monothesim.
(Warriors : 1/1/1, Archers : 1/1/1, SpearMen : 1/1/1, Swordmen : 2/1/1, Chariots : 1/1/2, Horsemen : 1/1/2)

3. When the Isrealis discover Monotheism, their units go back to normal.

4. Should an Isreali civ be wiped out of the game prior to them discovering any middle age tech, they will be respawn, but not until the beginning of the modern era, but be granted Metropolises in their former homeland (anybody in their home land will be kicked out) with several military units in each city with all normal improvements.

[WhiteBandit]

Well...

As I stated earlier, I did vote no...

Perhaps I am Shiber in disguise!!



have a nice day,

[Meshelic]

Originally posted by joncnunn
I'm thinking that the Isreali civ would be religious & militaristic, no UU but have the following charaterstics:

1. Prior to them discovering Polythesim, all Isreali units fight with doubled atack and defense points.
(Warriors : 2/2/1, Archers : 4/2/1, SpearMen : 2/4/1, Swordmen : 6/4/1, Chariots : 2/2/2, Horse Men : 4/2/2)

2. When the Isrealis discover Polytheism, all their units fights with halved attack and defense points until they discover Monothesim.
(Warriors : 1/1/1, Archers : 1/1/1, SpearMen : 1/1/1, Swordmen : 2/1/1, Chariots : 1/1/2, Horsemen : 1/1/2)

3. When the Isrealis discover Monotheism, their units go back to normal.

4. Should an Isreali civ be wiped out of the game prior to them discovering any middle age tech, they will be respawn, but not until the beginning of the modern era, but be granted Metropolises in their former homeland (anybody in their home land will be kicked out) with several military units in each city with all normal improvements.

Wow. The potential here is amazing. I like this alot.!Especially the parts about having to discover Monotheism, respawning if wiped out, and a unit called the "Wrath of God". Make it look like the Ark of the Covenent or something....

Perhaps the MOD'S forum needs a new addition, eh?

[Arnelos]

wow... talk about thread evolution

[Meshelic]

it's called distraction.

[MrWhereItsAt]

Think about what the VP has to do. The main role of the VP has been to be the President when the Prez is busy elsewhere. This means we are being aksed here to say whether we think panag is Presidential material for short bursts.

There is no safety in anyone "keeping an eye" on the VP - if they are needed, their purpose will be to REPLACE the President. There are no safeguards.

So, if you haven't voted, or even if you HAVE, think over one thing: do you believe panag is qualified to have Presidential duties where the need arises? The answer to this question and this question alone will determine your vote. No need for any more ranting (as fun as it can be).

Anything personal aside, I voted No.

[GhengisFarbâ„¢]

Originally posted by MrWhereItsAt
No need for any more ranting.

What do you mean "no more ranting"? Its exactly this kind of post that I can't stand! If I want to rant I will and you people and your twisted personal agendas against ranting are going to get it.

I hereby move we impeach MrWIA for this blatant violation of the entire purpose of our constitiution.

[Arnelos]

Originally posted by GhengisFarb
I hereby move we impeach MrWIA for this blatant violation of the entire purpose of our constitiution.

Impeach from what position?

EDIT: punctuation

[WhiteBandit]

I guess we'd have to have it as an "I.O.U." Or rather, an "Impeachment Owed to You!"

You know... in case Mr. WIA tries to become President again .