Originally posted by UnOrthOdOx
No, but WE are bound by gOd. (there is ONE with two facez people...) There is nothing wrong with writing it in so the new people can read WHY our Prophet is voted upon. If gOd changes it, well, that is an amendment that can pass with no voting, right?
Senate?
Laws?
I know of no such things. And while I have yur attention, I just posted a couple of polls you will want to add.
No, but WE are bound by gOd. (there is ONE with two facez people...) There is nothing wrong with writing it in so the new people can read WHY our Prophet is voted upon. If gOd changes it, well, that is an amendment that can pass with no voting, right?
![Big Grin](https://apolyton.net/core/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
Senate?
Laws?
I know of no such things. And while I have yur attention, I just posted a couple of polls you will want to add.
Constitutional Convention terms:
Senate: Body of players.
Laws: Sort of like official polls; decisions the senate is allowed to make. The idea that the Senate can pass laws not appropriate for inclusion in the Constitution. Credit to Togas for the idea. Is already public knowledge, and is just an idea (won't promise it'll be in there), so I'm not giving away Constitutional Convention secrets or anything
![Big Grin](https://apolyton.net/core/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
As for the gOdz, I agree (decisions from them are amendments that don't need voting on), but I still don't think it needs inclusion in the Constitution -- the players can decide what they need when they need to.
-- adaMada
Comment