I think that soon we will have to decide what long term goals we want to achieve. If we are to continue wave after wave of wars and war planning, then I say we might as well go for the whole thing and conquest, since as long as we continue sucha policy, many will ask that we retain a backwards form of government, which means that the A.I. will build a huge tech advantage. The age of buying our techs is wanning, so either we have to take our techs by war, or get them oursleves.
I prefer to get them oursleves, which means an end to all this warfare. The problem is that the bigger we get, the more the A.I., rightly, will try to prune us, just as we plan to prune others. The bigger we get, the less likely the AI will leave us alone, and the more costly the empire building will get. We have to try to strike a balance. This is not to say I I dont covet more lands. Primarily, I covet all of America, Greece's cities in the Great basin and their capitol, and all of Germany, while I see lands south towards Abananaba Minor and Persia not be worth the effort.
We also have to remember that there are 4 other civs missing. Unless we aim at conquest or dominion victories, these civs might also be future space competitiors. We can not forget that.
I prefer to get them oursleves, which means an end to all this warfare. The problem is that the bigger we get, the more the A.I., rightly, will try to prune us, just as we plan to prune others. The bigger we get, the less likely the AI will leave us alone, and the more costly the empire building will get. We have to try to strike a balance. This is not to say I I dont covet more lands. Primarily, I covet all of America, Greece's cities in the Great basin and their capitol, and all of Germany, while I see lands south towards Abananaba Minor and Persia not be worth the effort.
We also have to remember that there are 4 other civs missing. Unless we aim at conquest or dominion victories, these civs might also be future space competitiors. We can not forget that.
Comment