DIA : After the French Campaign

[Ninot]

Originally posted by Epistax
Ninot we know of Joan's influence over you. 'Attack the immortals' sure it sounds good when she says it. Hell anything sounds good when she whispers it to you laying on your satin sheets.

She has you like this:
We need you like this:
So you can be this:

</smiley abuse>

What happens between Joan and I is of no consequence to you! All we did was share a few bottles of fine French wine.. and sure, I tried out her bed a few times, but thats all im saying!

[Inverse Icarus]

tsk tsk tsk ninot.

we "dumb war grunts" as you call us have our own academy, and that academy has devistated America and helped Apolytonia to proliferate.

and i've seen you post in some war academy threads, and i didn't go out of my way to berrate you.

tsk tsk tsk indeed.

[Ninot]

out of the way? i thought i was on track there

you have served us well. the accademy has served its purpose well. but there is a reason why there arent more UFC members holding power, and i seek for the DIA to exploit that!

and the war accademy isnt a political party, it is merely a device to develop plans. the DIA IS a party. your posting here, so thats reason enough to berate you.

[Donal Graeme]

When I played Civ 2, I was the quintessential Builder/Industrialist player. I found that it was far more effective to have 6 to 12 "super-cities" than 2 dozen mediocre ones. However, as I have been playing Civ 3, that strategy is simply not as effective. Culture has made city creation more difficult, and some other changes have led me to become a more expansionist player. Yet that does not mean that we have to expand super fast. We do need more space, but is France the right direction to look? If you ask me what we really need is to finish off the Americans and then the Greeks. That is all the territory we need, and most importantly, leaves a strong France to guard our south. Since France is fairly peaceful, they will make good neighbors. So if we do fight them this time, we should try to make up afterwards and curry their favor for the mid-game.

Ninot, you don't like the fact that UFC ppl are posting, and that is understandable. But what you should be angry about is the fact that only a few DIA ppl are posting. That should be a bigger concern.

edit: Also, Greece makes for a better location for a FP hub than France does. So we should only take a handful of the closer French cities, and not cripple them entirely.

[Timeline]

Just so ya'll know, I AM watching. I just haven't had enough time to post like I want to...

I'm still here though, I think we should war with France then stop there for a very long time. The territory from America and France is more than enough land for us to build on for many years. Also, it will allow us to hold #1 spot for a long time, which is extremely important in my view.

I don't think we should fight the Persians because of the Immortals, and Greece because of the Hoplites. France seems to be the best chioce, although it will be killing off a possible ally of the future.

Oh well, why be allied with cities when you can just control them directly?

[UnOrthOdOx]

Can I just step in here a minute as a reporter?

Timeline, I know you are busy, and I know you read my PM, so is it OK? You know... A simple yes/no will do. Sooner the better.


Now, as a Hawk, we are all VERY sorry for keeping this on the front page as it was getting SOO much DIA attention...

[Ninot]

Originally posted by Donal Graeme
When I played Civ 2, I was the quintessential Builder/Industrialist player. I found that it was far more effective to have 6 to 12 "super-cities" than 2 dozen mediocre ones. However, as I have been playing Civ 3, that strategy is simply not as effective. Culture has made city creation more difficult, and some other changes have led me to become a more expansionist player. Yet that does not mean that we have to expand super fast. We do need more space, but is France the right direction to look? If you ask me what we really need is to finish off the Americans and then the Greeks. That is all the territory we need, and most importantly, leaves a strong France to guard our south. Since France is fairly peaceful, they will make good neighbors. So if we do fight them this time, we should try to make up afterwards and curry their favor for the mid-game.

Ninot, you don't like the fact that UFC ppl are posting, and that is understandable. But what you should be angry about is the fact that only a few DIA ppl are posting. That should be a bigger concern.

edit: Also, Greece makes for a better location for a FP hub than France does. So we should only take a handful of the closer French cities, and not cripple them entirely.

oh, im not angry at all personally. annoyed at UFC mingling? mayyybe... but its not really a heavy issue, its just bickering.

btw, Timeline, you didnt answer my PM

[Inverse Icarus]

We have a governmental majority, we CAN use it to make our own decisions, instead of nodding our heads to everything Uber says is wise.

Its sounds as if you believe the people of Apolytonia are nothing more than sheep, blindly following anything I say with blind eyes.

This is so far from the truth it's almost appauling.

The citizens of Apolytonia, especially those in the War Academy don't just "nod their heads", they discuss everything rationally.

I've brought up the possibilty of War Chariots twice, and each time the majority has express a dislike of the ideas, so I will again discard that idea.

I'm the SMC. It's my GOVERNMENTAL DUTY to dream up strategies and bring them to the people. You seem mad because the people like my strategies and agree with them. Either that or you honestly believe the people just follow me blindly. Either way, it shows a severe lack of character.

[GePap]

First of all, enough with the character assasination: it serves no purpose whatsoever. (ges up and wait for gOd to come down and punish his errant and whinning kids)



I Must say that I agree with Donal on the issue of early expansion, we need it to then set up a abse for expansion. Right now Franche is our weakest neighbor after the Americans- everyone else is stronger. War expansio wll be easier than peaceful for a few more turns, and we probably need to do it.

THe extent of territory Uber laid for us gaining would give us a solid base. I think that war with France will hapen:most people have been pushing for it since day 1 we met them, and there is no way we can stop that avalanche. We need to save political capitl for after the war, to try to arrest even further warmongerring aims, which might put us in a hard spot.

I also think we need to look further ahead in terms of diplomacy. Once we beat France, we will become a middle power, which will put us on the radar screens of various civs. The Greeks will only get stronger, as wil the Romans, wo wil become our new southern neighbors, them and the russians. As much as I know the effectiveness of immortals and Persia's strategy of building hordes, the terrain between us and Persia an be used for a defensive advantage, and we will always be better than the A.I. in fighting pitched battles. After lookig at all the civs, Germnay seems the greatest threat. They have the pop. to afford a big expansion for now, and they are rght north of us, on nice flat terrain, great for offensive warfare(against us).

I say that after the War with France(not before), we as a party, or just a group of like minded individuals, need to sell the rest on the need to build up our temples, cathedrals and so forth to be strong enough to weather what coems next. We also need to begin some serious exploration of the world around us, not only to Ubes sle but beyond. In short: war wth France is inevitable, Plan Gold won by a landslide. Wha we need to do is make sure that any plans after that are of a defensive nature, and keep in mind city expansion as the main point.

[Timeline]

PM response:

Unorth: Yes
Ninot: No - SORRY!

[Ninot]

Originally posted by UberKruX


Its sounds as if you believe the people of Apolytonia are nothing more than sheep, blindly following anything I say with blind eyes.

This is so far from the truth it's almost appauling.

The citizens of Apolytonia, especially those in the War Academy don't just "nod their heads", they discuss everything rationally.

I've brought up the possibilty of War Chariots twice, and each time the majority has express a dislike of the ideas, so I will again discard that idea.

I'm the SMC. It's my GOVERNMENTAL DUTY to dream up strategies and bring them to the people. You seem mad because the people like my strategies and agree with them. Either that or you honestly believe the people just follow me blindly. Either way, it shows a severe lack of character.

well, im not attacking your character. so you can get away from those illusions. the only purpose to my posts so far is to show my party they have other options than following war plans every term. after all, it is our party stance to not be warmongers

and, i wont pursue attacking your character at all from henceforth in this thread, as i feel I haven't truly done so to any bad degree thus far, and i feel i shouldn't do so at all from this point either.

and, as for the final paragraph of your post, i wont answer it in length, because that will only spin this more out of preportion. all i will say is that i disagree with all of it.

the purpose for my original rant was to get my party thinking more independently than it was. i did not plan for a war of "characters".

That is all I have to say

[Spiffor]

the purpose for my original rant was to get my party thinking more independently than it was. i did not plan for a war of "characters".

This was also my purpose when opening the thread. A clear thing is predictable : warmongers will argue further wars (against Germans, against Persians, against Greece, against Rome) are necessary because we'd be threatened, and need a preemptive strike.
With their media (war academy, machiavelli institute to some extent), they'll say it so loudly we'll begin to believe it. We need places to discuss :

1. In order to know what mostly silent DIA people want.
2. In order to show warmongering is not the only choice.

Don't get me wrong : I finally support the war against France, and finishing off the Americans (not the French). But after this, we'll have a big enough territory, and will need an army only to defend ourselves against agressions, and to prune our potential rivals to victory. After this war, we'd be able to say "give peace a chance", or "Make love money, not war".

[UnOrthOdOx]

Sorry, again for interrupting:

I would like to say, for me, the highlight of the game so far has been these non-political groups mentioned above. I am glad to see some activity in organizing the Thinker's guild as well. Perhaps some of you more active DIA members could do something similar to the Culture Club? (or rename something similar) To speak of peacefull alternatives without making it a DIA only discussion? Why drag politics into something this important?

Just a thought.

[Kuciwalker]

After France, we should stop with the wars. We should have a good border defense (i.e. we need more troops at the edge, and few in cities like Apolyton or Termina etc.), but concentrate on building up our infrastructure, especially roads.

[Spiffor]

Unortho :
Actually, I thought the DIA needed a place to discuss its views, to elaborate a platform. The Great Debate (builders / warmongers) is unsolvable through compromise, because the game is balanced enough to make these 2 paths viable.
Warmongering or building are not vital necessities (well, building our infrastructure in the near future is necessary, but building all the time isn't), they are a choice of society. Warmongers are already organized, with the UFC and Military Ac. / Machiavelli Inst.

Builders, on the other hand, aren't organized because it was impossible to seriously push for builder policies in the past. We need intellectuals to think in global terms (such as "what does builder mean ?"), and we need a political relay to builder demands, which is the DIA.
A builder party is essential for builder policies to be more than talk. Same thing applies for a warmonger party.