Originally posted by Togas
My hope is that someone from The Court will drop in and post to this thread
My hope is that someone from The Court will drop in and post to this thread
AFAIK the Court has not decided anything (including whether this has merit), Judge Epistax has just listed it as something we need to look at since we don't want to ignore anything and it's already been publicly posted (not by us). cool your heels everyone. do not panic or jump to conclusions. we will get to it soon and you can trust us to be fair. apparently this is just a ruling about a poll and not anything against jdd2007 (btw there are no laws about prosecuting individuals who are not officials).
I cannot make any further comments on this specific case until I consult with the remaining Judges. while we do not have a senior Judge yet, I suggest you speak with Rt. Hon. Epistax as he has taken the initiative in setting things up.
I would prefer, in the future, that The Court itself post case threads and that citizens PM possible cases to The Court for submission.
In the future, please PM either the Senior Judge (not yet chosen) or all of us, to avoid this sort of public panic. Also, please avoid titling the thread in a misleading manner. The Court has no power to prosecute individuals who are not officials. We may rule on a poll, but not do anything to the poll-maker. If possible, please retitle this appropriately.
Please be patient while all Judges are contacted.
Judge Captain
Comment