I hope we all agree that one of the least productive things we can do is blame our Ministers for every little thing. I do not recall any controversy at all over civman's election, when everyone knew he would not be around the whole term. We who voted for him either accepted this, were guilty of voting without reading the candidates' posts, or just did not think ahead.
I think in this case we can not blame Timeline for any of it. However, everyone must also accept that it is non-ideal to have candidates unable to complete their terms as often as we have experienced to date. We must, next elections, make sure we think long and hard about voting for a candidate who may leave early. If we are to accept this behaviour, we need to have some acceptable way around it - via appointee, the runner-up in the election or the VP taking that position whilst the elected official is away. We don't need to further clog up the Constitution with this either, just have an acceptable way of getting around it.
So, what do you say - have the VP take over? That is what they are there for. And if the VP is too busy, then we may need a snap election.
I think in this case we can not blame Timeline for any of it. However, everyone must also accept that it is non-ideal to have candidates unable to complete their terms as often as we have experienced to date. We must, next elections, make sure we think long and hard about voting for a candidate who may leave early. If we are to accept this behaviour, we need to have some acceptable way around it - via appointee, the runner-up in the election or the VP taking that position whilst the elected official is away. We don't need to further clog up the Constitution with this either, just have an acceptable way of getting around it.
So, what do you say - have the VP take over? That is what they are there for. And if the VP is too busy, then we may need a snap election.
Comment