well, they are the only ones to be both militristic and commercial. anyone else feel that thats just too much power (one step below scientific and militristic IMO).
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
MY FIRST POST!!! Persians having too much power??
Collapse
X
-
Welcome to Apolyton Free Radical! Hope you enjoy these forums as much as I have.
Currently there are many discussions going on in various threads about the different civ specific attributes. Check a few of them out.
My personal opinion is that they seem to be balanced pretty well, the different ones and it the two that best suite your play style will be the civ to choose. It should be fun to play with and against the various tribes.About 24,000 people die every day from hunger or hunger-related causes. With a simple click daily at the Hunger Site you can provide food for those who need it.
-
well, they are the only ones to be both militristic and commercial. anyone else feel that thats just too much power (one step below scientific and militristic IMO).
Only problem is that my golden age will be too soon. Don't want it before 500 b.c. Probably delay production of hoplites, then send them against a pathetic enemy to trigger golden age.12-17-10 Mohamed Bouazizi NEVER FORGET
Stadtluft Macht Frei
Killing it is the new killing it
Ultima Ratio Regum
Comment
-
Go ahead for single player, you will be practicing for a MP game that you will not be able to use the new attributes that you gave.About 24,000 people die every day from hunger or hunger-related causes. With a simple click daily at the Hunger Site you can provide food for those who need it.
Comment
-
well I never enjoyed Civ 2 for its MP aspects (when it got them that is). I always loved the single player game so im sure thats what im gonna love with civ 3 as well.
besides, even for MP games, im sure both or all players can agree on variable settings.**Never argue with a fools, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience** - Shadow
Comment
-
Re: MY FIRST POST!!! Persians having too much power??
Originally posted by Free Radical
well, they are the only ones to be both militristic and commercial. anyone else feel that thats just too much power (one step below scientific and militristic IMO).'There is a greater darkness than the one we fight. It is the darkness of the soul that has lost its way. The war we fight is not against powers and principalities, it is against chaos and despair. Greater than the death of flesh is the death of hope, the death of dreams. Against this peril we can never surrender. The future is all around us, waiting, in moments of transition, to be born in moments of revelation. No one knows the shape of that future or where it will take us. We know only that it is always born in pain.'"
G'Kar - from Babylon 5 episode "Z'ha'dum"
Comment
-
I think the Persians are finally entering into their own. In CivII they were emasculated push-overs screaming to be conquered. In reality, they were a vast empire, stretching from Ethiopia to India to the Danube! I don't believe they'll be overpowering, but I do believe they'll finally stand up for themselves. Besides, we don't know their unique unit yet. It could be quite weak!The Apolytoner formerly known as Alexander01
"God has given no greater spur to victory than contempt of death." - Hannibal Barca, c. 218 B.C.
"We can legislate until doomsday but that will not make men righteous." - George Albert Smith, A.D. 1949
The Kingdom of Jerusalem: Chronicles of the Golden Cross - a Crusader Kings After Action Report
Comment
Comment