Man, is this a great game or what?
I am replaying the game as Persians on emperor. Perhaps a little "cheaty" to play on a map you know, but it's as another civ and on a higher level, so it's still a new game.
Some major events:
350 BC: Republic up and running with the help of 30 % lux slider.
330 AD: Great Library built just to deny it to others. Never used it.
500 approx: Forbidden Palace in a city 6-7 tiles north of capitol. 16 cities built on my mainland.
980 AD: Contact - they are way behind.
990 AD: Sistine
1000 AD: Settled on the island north of Greece. Not totally corrupt!
1200: Bach's
1200: Settled on the Incense field. France soon joined in. I got 4 cities there before they blocked the rest.
1260: Copernicus in my capitol
1260: Contact with the Egypts (the last). All 8 lux hooked up.
1290: Magellan
1300 approx: England asked for help against the Greeks who where about to overrun them. I said yes to get a good excuse to conquer. Trade deal with Greece recently expired anyway. England was soon overrun and entered the history books.
1370: Leo built. Upgraded all my troops and sailed to Greece. 21 cavallery and muskets landed. Greeks have only swordsmen and hoplites. This is where the I will start from.
I have been researching at 4 turns/tech with plenty of +gold since navigation. Iroquis are at a slight score lead with me close behind. Iroquis are 2-3 techs behind me, the others civs much more. I expect to go industrial within 10 turns (1400 AD approx).
It's peculiar that my monarch game felt like deity, while my emperor game feels like regent. But now I know all the special tricks that are useful on this particular map (but would fail miserably on other maps). Anyway, I have only seen one emeror game where I was better, and that was as Iroquis on a large continent map, where my mounted warriors made vassals of the poor AI:s. In this game I am outresearching and outbuilding them by myself.
I am replaying the game as Persians on emperor. Perhaps a little "cheaty" to play on a map you know, but it's as another civ and on a higher level, so it's still a new game.
Some major events:
350 BC: Republic up and running with the help of 30 % lux slider.
330 AD: Great Library built just to deny it to others. Never used it.
500 approx: Forbidden Palace in a city 6-7 tiles north of capitol. 16 cities built on my mainland.
980 AD: Contact - they are way behind.
990 AD: Sistine
1000 AD: Settled on the island north of Greece. Not totally corrupt!
1200: Bach's
1200: Settled on the Incense field. France soon joined in. I got 4 cities there before they blocked the rest.
1260: Copernicus in my capitol
1260: Contact with the Egypts (the last). All 8 lux hooked up.
1290: Magellan
1300 approx: England asked for help against the Greeks who where about to overrun them. I said yes to get a good excuse to conquer. Trade deal with Greece recently expired anyway. England was soon overrun and entered the history books.
1370: Leo built. Upgraded all my troops and sailed to Greece. 21 cavallery and muskets landed. Greeks have only swordsmen and hoplites. This is where the I will start from.
I have been researching at 4 turns/tech with plenty of +gold since navigation. Iroquis are at a slight score lead with me close behind. Iroquis are 2-3 techs behind me, the others civs much more. I expect to go industrial within 10 turns (1400 AD approx).
It's peculiar that my monarch game felt like deity, while my emperor game feels like regent. But now I know all the special tricks that are useful on this particular map (but would fail miserably on other maps). Anyway, I have only seen one emeror game where I was better, and that was as Iroquis on a large continent map, where my mounted warriors made vassals of the poor AI:s. In this game I am outresearching and outbuilding them by myself.
Comment