The Altera Centauri collection has been brought up to date by Darsnan. It comprises every decent scenario he's been able to find anywhere on the web, going back over 20 years.
25 themes/skins/styles are now available to members. Check the select drop-down at the bottom-left of each page.
Call To Power 2 Cradle 3+ mod in progress: https://apolyton.net/forum/other-games/call-to-power-2/ctp2-creation/9437883-making-cradle-3-fully-compatible-with-the-apolyton-edition
I think everyone needs to download it, but you might want to ask someone who knows mroe on the subject.
The one and only panda of the Red Army.
Xenozodskyovitchkov, retired Commander of the 1st Ukrainian Front.
Recipient of the Medal for Accomplishment in IRC Chat
Why did you leave battleships out? Did they make it unbalanced?(I've known some scenarios where battleships were nigh-invulnerable)
The one and only panda of the Red Army.
Xenozodskyovitchkov, retired Commander of the 1st Ukrainian Front.
Recipient of the Medal for Accomplishment in IRC Chat
You know, the battleships "died" in some way during WW2. The new rulers of the seas are the Carriers.
If you take a look at all the "modern" civ2 scenarios (post WW2) you won´t find battleships anywhere.
To be honest, i don´t know the "precise" reasons of this decision
You're right, I didn't think about battleships becoming used less and less. I mostly play WWII scenarios, which battleships are usually a big part of.
Question: Are railroads now used as roads or are there only railroads built in the beginning?
The one and only panda of the Red Army.
Xenozodskyovitchkov, retired Commander of the 1st Ukrainian Front.
Recipient of the Medal for Accomplishment in IRC Chat
Are railroads now used as roads or are there only railroads built in the beginning?
The graphics are railroads. But they work as roads with the classic x3 road multiplier
Railroads are forbidden in this scenario. We don´t want more "Darius Railroad Blitzkrieg Tactics"
I think I have something to propose as soon as some more people are here...
The one and only panda of the Red Army.
Xenozodskyovitchkov, retired Commander of the 1st Ukrainian Front.
Recipient of the Medal for Accomplishment in IRC Chat
Originally posted by academia
Darius:
Please!! Forgive me!!! well... you can insult me as much as you want
I made a new mistake regarding turn increment
I´m going to use a 3 months per turn rate.
Could you donwnload this file and replay your turn?
I promise you this is the last time!!!
PLEASE, EVERYBODY MUST DOWNLOAD THIS NEW .SCN FILE!!!
Wait, did you assume that I didn't load the file you posted yesterday at 23:08 and post it again, or is this a third file?
Originally posted by academia
You know, the battleships "died" in some way during WW2. The new rulers of the seas are the Carriers.
If you take a look at all the "modern" civ2 scenarios (post WW2) you won´t find battleships anywhere.
To be honest, i don´t know the "precise" reasons of this decision
Dont say that to the US Marine Corps! I know a lot of Marines who cried the day they put our last battleships in storage. Marines LOVE those volkswagens flying thru the air!
*"Winning is still the goal, and we cannot win if we lose (gawd, that was brilliant - you can quote me on that if you want. And con - I don't want to see that in your sig."- Beta
So, would it be okay with everyone if we started making proposals and such?
The one and only panda of the Red Army.
Xenozodskyovitchkov, retired Commander of the 1st Ukrainian Front.
Recipient of the Medal for Accomplishment in IRC Chat
The scenario looks great. (Also liked the Falklands one, once the action got started!)
Can we start making diplomatic proposals now, or do we have to wait our turn (me also being a PBEM newbie)?
Those battleship shells were quite something. But compared to SSMs, I guess they're out.
edit - looks like you beat me, Xeno.
II. 193 And fight them until there is no more tumult and oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in Allah; but if they cease, let there be no hostility except to those who practice oppression.
NATO PROPOSES LIMITATION ON USE OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS
We at NATO wish to prevent massive casualties as a result of nuclear war. To do this, we ask all nations to agree that in case of war, not to use any nuclear weapons unless their entire existence is threatened. This will hopefully promote quick ends to a war between two or more nations, as no nation wishes to suffer the tragedy of nuclear war.
NATO wishes to thank all those who work for a better tommarrow.
The one and only panda of the Red Army.
Xenozodskyovitchkov, retired Commander of the 1st Ukrainian Front.
Recipient of the Medal for Accomplishment in IRC Chat
Leon, do you need something to tell you how to work PBEMs? I have a great guide to them.
The one and only panda of the Red Army.
Xenozodskyovitchkov, retired Commander of the 1st Ukrainian Front.
Recipient of the Medal for Accomplishment in IRC Chat
Can we start making diplomatic proposals now, or do we have to wait our turn (me also being a PBEM newbie)?
Yes, please.
Yaroslav (USA) and El Leon (China):
Your countries are at war at the beginning of the scenario as a result of the Vietnam Conflict.
Both of you must establish the limits of this war: Territorial and Military limits. ok?
Comment