Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Nicosar's Master Challenge

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Nicosar
    but anyway, id like to take your best player and see how he does in my scenario.... i dont think after that, that he will be able to claim mastery in all fields, despite his profficiency in regular civ.... and im not claiming that same mastery either, but what I am saying is that I am a master of that slower, bigger, customized style of play, and also that this style of play would seem to be better, so I guess that is a slight elitist boast when combined but not as absolute as you make it seem.


    Yes yes, I'm starting a game of "watch the grass grow".
    I'm anticipating a game to last at least 10 growing seasons.

    Until anyone takes up the challange, I will be King of watching grass grow.

    Get real. Everyone knocks down all your arguements and all you can fall back on is commit ourselves for months to a game with a player who hasn't beat anybody in sight, and doesn't understand some of the most basic things to prove ourselves.

    Yes, you can be the king of your version of "watch the grass grow". Quit wasting our time. You are the king. All praise the King.

    RAH

    And yes berz, those were the days. Blitzkreig was another one that had tons of armies. In college, the game club I played at actually had all the naval miniatures for playing Jutland. (and any other naval game) We played on the cafateria floor. Man, we were quit a bunch of geeks with all of our movement and ranging rulers. One battle would take hours. *sigh*, thank god for PCs.

    Yes and those geeks could tell the differences of very similar ship designs on a 3 inch miniature from 30 feet.
    It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
    RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

    Comment


    • Wow! You guys had actual minis of the ships in Jutland? Cool!!!

      Was Blitzkrieg the one with blue and red forces? We played that one alot too before Panzer Blitz came out. One of my friends stumbled upon a different company, SPI I think, with alot of specialized scenarios, alot of ancient warfare set ups - basicly just a paper map with units.

      Comment


      • Originally posted at the dark place

        LONGEST TURN CHAT IN DEMOGAME HISTORY!

        We recently played our longest turn chat ever! The final time, after just 5 turns (an abbreviated turn chat), was 6 hours and 20 minutes. The previous record stood at 6 hours. The game, which started at 4:00pm EST, was called off at 10:20pm EST by the 2nd DP (Designated Player), as everyone was literally starting to fall asleep.
        Have you tried demogames Nicosar?

        Comment


        • I suggest Nicosar go out and buy Third Reich or ASL... Those would be more suited to your needs.

          My great creations included a hybrid of Bismarck (Used the ships and played on Tile floor outside of the carpet), Panzer Blitz (played on the carpet) and Luftwaffe (used a shelf of my Mom's to determine height, and then attacked almost everything on the battlefield).

          Those were the days indeed, as your mind would fry at the thought of two Hummels and a Wespe bombarding a T-34 stack on higher ground in cover but in a gully...

          Trying to ring the odds up in your head was somewhat nightmarish, and then you would blow it by rolling a 1 and the next turn your spotters would be dead. After the trash talking was over, the BATTLE resolution would take 15 mins.

          Those were indeed the great days of gaming.
          Some days are diamonds, some days are rocks...

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Berzerker

            Was Blitzkrieg the one with blue and red forces?
            Not sure what the colors were in Blitzkrieg but there were actually countries involved I think.

            You may be thinking of TACTICS II which wasn't historical based, just the red forces vs the blue forces on a reasonably even map. When I played with Ming, I'd take the blue and he'd take the red. (commie bastard )


            The posts here seem to support that many of us CIVII MP players are very experienced in games that took an excrutiating amount of time, so I guess Nicosar is going to have to look for a different way to insult us so he can feel superior.

            Rich
            It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
            RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Nicosar
              but now you cannot denounce me further lest you should contend with me in my own arena and beat me there...
              Sure we can...

              Now let me get this straight... you can't seem to win playing the game the normal way... So you design a different game, with new units and statistics, on a map you created, and whatever other changes you've made... where you know everything, and have some experience with it... and anybody that decided to play you would be doing so with no experience...



              Gee... so you are really saying that the only chance you have to win is if somebody plays you in a game specifically designed by you...



              I think we can continue "denouncing" you...
              And what's really funny, from the total lack of knowledge of the game you have shown so far, you would still probably lose...

              In the future, you should seriously consider not coming to a new forum/community, telling everybody they suck, telling them that they don't know the game, telling them they play the game in an inferior way, telling them that you know all and are the only one that can design a superior version of the game... and that you are a master of the game. Especially when you can't beat anybody

              So please don't wonder why people are jumping down your throat. From the very beginning, you have been insulting and condescending. As rah stated before, different strokes for different folks. I also have no problem with people liking different settings and styles than I do. I do have a problem when some bozo tries to tell me that his way is the superior way, and that any other way is not true gaming.
              Keep on Civin'
              RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O

              Comment


              • no, I think its quite clearly my throat is being subject to such foul odors because you all are really exciteable and must pounce like nervous squirrels, and not due to some fault of my own... would it be that long ago we could've discussed this like gentlemen, but no, i'm afraid, you would all rather bathe in that stale air of cynical puns and vengeful remarks, as if this was some forum for a bunch of teenage Quake players and not the dignified lobby for a great strategy game... (*!*)...

                I am punished not nor suffer by the attrition that takes place here, not in the least, and I would say that if you built up such a fevered height of intensity simply to get a few scanty and nervously shouted points across to someone who you feel some queer need to contest with so harshly and without any tact, that this must surely be born of some insecurity, because, friends, maybe I am an elitist cult-mongering snooty looser sitting in his tiny little hut in the middle of the woods, converted from an out-house, all alone in the dark by himself with a dunce cap that read master and a sign outside saying "NiCoSaRR'S KOuL gAiM!!", or, as maybe you have detected by my choice of words, I am not completely stupid, and maybe even slightly aware, and that I too have been playing this for years, as well as other strategt games (board games too, that's not really rare or ancient you know) and that I happened to make a greatly optimised truly deeper version of the game, but by your reactions one would think such an occurrence impossible!

                So considering that this is indeed a possiblity, and maybe if you are brave enough to break the routine of this malaised environment of yelling pundits to trust me a bit, one who is not so shallow to design a game simply so that he can reign supreme in it and who is fully aware of other's people 'enhanced versions' which fall far short of being any sort of upgrade, you would not be so despodent to what might be something even you would enjoy more than the regular game.... but I suppose this wish of mine to share my game with others is foolish and merely a coup by a supremacist tyrant...

                In fact, ever since I came back here there have been a couple players to offer great interest in it, since it seems that when people come to this thread they do not see your laughing heads and join in the wicked chuckling outright but instead see the reason behind our arguments... whosoever they should come from....

                Comment


                • and to think that so many of you are moss-grown ancient giants when I am but a yearling shoot of many less years....

                  .... and so it is not by the inventions my own twisted mind that I start to feel as least a little superior.....

                  Comment


                  • succinctness is a virtue
                    Pool Manager - Lombardi Handicappers League - An NFL Pick 'Em Pool

                    https://youtu.be/HLNhPMQnWu4

                    Comment


                    • you feel superior.....superior to what ...the ai ?????

                      can you even beat the ai...cuz you certainly haven't beaten a soul here. on a random map or on your own map....

                      tell you what....i bet if you gave yourself 5 setlers and we had 1 you would still lose....

                      do you even know the tech tree.....do you know what wonders are important in a game?

                      do you know how to fight an early war, or how to counter an early war, while expanding and exploring..

                      do you know optimal trade routes...can figure out the hut patter, the specials pattern, do you understand ZOC...if you can't answer yes to all those, and more...you are no master.....

                      like ming said, don't spout off what you can't back up.....your liable to be slapped silly and sent home crying
                      Boston Red Sox are 2004 World Series Champions!

                      Comment


                      • Well, you have to give him credit for persistence despite being an arogant little putz. Prior to his last tirade he was down to "you guys just aren't experienced in a prolonged mega game" Then multiple people post that yes we do have that experience and have had it for a long time.

                        Now, lacking his last piece of ammo in his arsonal. All he can do is turn our vast experience into "NOW WE"RE TOO OLD"


                        Now when the other half post that they're not old. All he'l l be left with is his fantasy.



                        RAH
                        It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
                        RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Nicosar
                          no, I think its quite clearly my throat is being subject to such foul odors because you all are really exciteable and must pounce like nervous squirrels, and not due to some fault of my own...


                          Yeah... no fault of your own... right.
                          You come here and tell everybody the way they play the game sucks, and your way is the true way... And then you claim your a master... which has been proved wrong many times due to your lack of knowledge of ever the simplist things about the game. You continue with your holier than thou attitude, and your condensending tone is an insult to everybody here.

                          would it be that long ago we could've discussed this like gentlemen, but no, i'm afraid, you would all rather bathe in that stale air of cynical puns and vengeful remarks, as if this was some forum for a bunch of teenage Quake players and not the dignified lobby for a great strategy game... (*!*)...
                          More of your insults. You don't address any real issues, but continue to come up with new crap... Yawn.

                          I am punished not nor suffer by the attrition that takes place here, not in the least, and I would say that if you built up such a fevered height of intensity simply to get a few scanty and nervously shouted points across to someone who you feel some queer need to contest with so harshly and without any tact, that this must surely be born of some insecurity, because, friends, maybe I am an elitist cult-mongering snooty looser sitting in his tiny little hut in the middle of the woods, converted from an out-house, all alone in the dark by himself with a dunce cap that read master and a sign outside saying "NiCoSaRR'S KOuL gAiM!!", or, as maybe you have detected by my choice of words, I am not completely stupid
                          You seem to be proving your lack knowledge with every additional post

                          and that I happened to make a greatly optimised truly deeper version of the game, but by your reactions one would think such an occurrence impossible!
                          Coming from you... yes, it does seem impossible. And it seems like only a few people (well maybe less) agree with your version of what might improve the game. Every discription you give of your "improved" game makes it seem like you are taking a step backwards. Only your pretty units are an improvement... but not anything else.

                          So considering that this is indeed a possiblity
                          Highly doubtful due to your lack knowledge of the game and what you've said about it so far.

                          , and maybe if you are brave enough to break the routine of this malaised environment of yelling pundits to trust me a bit, one who is not so shallow to design a game simply so that he can reign supreme in it and who is fully aware of other's people 'enhanced versions' which fall far short of being any sort of upgrade, you would not be so despodent to what might be something even you would enjoy more than the regular game.... but I suppose this wish of mine to share my game with others is foolish and merely a coup by a supremacist tyrant...
                          Again, you continue to look down your nose at people who understand the game many times better than you seem to.

                          You have designed a version of the game which is far too slow for an MP gaming experience. You have pretty much elimanted early combat because your large words have been designed for cowards who don't understand combat. You hide behind pretty graphics and the shell behind is it empty. You have shown us nothing that would lead us to believe you have enhanced the game.
                          You have done the exact opposite.

                          In fact, ever since I came back here there have been a couple players to offer great interest in it, since it seems that when people come to this thread they do not see your laughing heads and join in the wicked chuckling outright but instead see the reason behind our arguments... whosoever they should come from....
                          Great interest... Oh please, show us where somebody has shown anything but a passing interest.

                          If you want to gain allies here, learn diplomacy and stop your insulting crap with every post. You are only reaping what you sowed in your very first post, and have continued since.

                          And again oh great master, have you ever won a game of civ? Please provide names and dates, because frankly, your lack of understanding of the game would lead us to believe that you could only beat somebody with less knowledge of the game than you have... and I'm sure those types of people are very hard to find.


                          Now... if you really are truely trying to find people to play your game, I would suggest you drop the attitude and the overly wordy posts, and explain with no holier than thou attitude what exactly is different about your game without once saying any other way of playing is crap. But no, I just expect more meaningless drivel from you...
                          Keep on Civin'
                          RIP rah, Tony Bogey & Baron O

                          Comment


                          • Overly wordy Ming? No, this seems a mute point, coming from a shouting man who would tell others to be quiet. I would say that you cannot expect others to ration out their words when you would feast before their eyes...

                            But succintness is indeed a virtue, as that fellow said, maybe we should both learn from him, I know I will not pass up such wisdom anymore

                            People may voice interest privately though, for wiser people know that when voiced aloud and publicly that they'll get far more answers than they asked for and in the end hear nothing but a din of confusion...

                            I cannot help the spirit with which I wrote my first post, it was meant only to be thorough, and any resentful bruises gotten by it were a projection of the beholder and not an aspect of the reality, since its words were proud but edgeless, and it would only seem dangerously sharp to those that would contest first of all the prideful spirit and dismiss the man behind the blade...

                            As for the scenario, we will see how it does, I can claim that it is a deeply thought out and experienced design and you who have never touched it save its colorful facade (yessss... they are rather pretty arent they) could continue to denounce it with your eyes alone without ever touching its grain, but I would only ask you to remember, until that later proof should show itself, that I have made so many changes to every part of the game that you could not possibly begin to fully bear in mind the broader change which alter whole large areas of tactical gameplay and the whole strategy until you have delved into it, and you could make still assumptions, but ever the slim probability, despite your biases, that my game might even be the disputed heir to civ 2 and an improvement upon it should pester you to accompany your mere surface appraisals of deep things...
                            you may assume that it isn't great nor even good, but you will never know, at least though you should say otherwise, for to yourselves you will always know that you lacked the final word for something you had merely guessed upon...

                            Comment


                            • Even if I were to tell you all the rules and even explain them, I still think there would be burgeoning gaps for you to fill with your skepticism, and that this filler would most certainly be critical before it would assume good things...
                              Truly, the new web weaved by the combination of so many changes working together to create a new arena of new strategy is a fine silk seen only as cobwebs from afar, but you should have to tangle yourself in it before you judged the potency of its grip on you!

                              Comment


                              • Ming, could you change the name of the thread to Nicosar's continuing drivel? You can blame me if anyone objects.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X