Blitzkrieg PBEM (Playtest)

[academia]

Check the Icons file... there are some problems with the pics
USA and Britain should be allies
I hate those "if someone captures X city, then give tech to X civ" events...
Completely unrealistic

[academia]

Check the Icons file... there are some problems with the pics
USA and Britain should be allies
I hate those "if someone captures X city, then give tech to X civ" events...
Completely unrealistic... specially in the case of giving techs that allow you to build new, more powerful units...

Again, this is my point of view... i don´t wanna follow a written, historical plot in ww2 scenarios... i´d like to have more liberty to choose my own path...

[Nilat]

Academia, you very right, but i never notice these thing first
A few things to say:

The polikarpov I-16 cant move nearly anywhere! I think that the fighters should have about the same movement as a bomber (i mean a bomber in this version) and the bombers should have a better movement! Much better!

Japan only haves ONE division in many cities... I think that every city in this scenario (africa isnt so necessary ) should have at least two infantry. And at least 3 in big cities...

Nearly everything was said by academia but I just wanted to backup academia in this thing

Otherwise, I like this scenario alot

[Nilat]

I found a bug:
Neutrals have neutral division and cities are making them but their not in the production list.
Is this a mistake or is it on purpose

And a little suggestion: I think the soviets should have only a little more units in the east.

[Eivind IV]

I like the way ZWK is designed...But I'll think about it...

[jim panse]

If noone wants to take the Axis I could take it and the USSR would be again at your disposal

[Nilat]

Lets make a deal: If nobody will take the axis in 3 days jim can play them? Good?

[academia]

I like the way ZWK is designed...But I'll think about it...

Oops... Houston, we have a problem!!

Mmm... nothing personal against you Kobra, but i may not intervene in a game with the current playability conditions.
Sorry, but i didn´t like the ZWK scenario... I found it too slow, frustrating and boring.
Please, take into account that we are going to play a pbem scenario... with 7 civs... with all the "undesired delays" that always happen... please, think about it!!
Really, it took me like 11 turns to travel from America to UK!!!!!!

[Eivind IV]

I'm interested in knowing how much do you think the movement rate should be changed?

[Nilat]

I think ground troops have a good movement rate now, but ships and planes are just too slow.
I dont know... I think fighters should have a movement rate about 6(12)? and these big bombers should have something about 8(32)? or more
And divebombers should have 6(12) too in my opinion.

The capital ship should have 8, cause these kind of ships were not so fast
The landing craft could have something about 10 movement?
Submarines movement rate should be something 7

This is what I think, you dont have to listen to my stupid requests

[Eivind IV]

None of the requests are stupid! Actually I apreciate you taking an interest!

[Nilat]

Thanks!
But what do you think about these movement rates?
I played the scanario and I imagined those movement rates, i think their pretty good.

[Eivind IV]

Allright fellas! Here's the new version 1.4. Hopefully that will be the last one before I have to go into the military, because I am packing my stuff as we speak

If you take a look at the ranges of the planes and the ships I think you will be happily surprised Consider it a present

Now, let's get an axis player and get going!

[Eivind IV]

If you look at China's money situation in the above version, you understand that this is the *.scn-file you should be using

Just replace the *.scn-file from above with this one.

[jim panse]

Ok, I guess we should get this thing rolling before Kobra has to go.

Let´s say I take the Axis and someone else (EmuGod?) takes the USSR.

o Yeah, let´s get goin´!

o Nope, that´s a bad idea.