RED FRONT 1.4 Demogame?

[Henrik]

I recon every turn will take about as long as a pbem round, quite managable as the scenario is short by comparison to for instace age of war...

[klesh]

Originally posted by greeny
Just to clarify: the Front commanders (and Armaments minister) could set production in their citys and the Economic minister could then rushbuy approved rushbuy requests during his turn. This should not increase the workload of the Armaments minister.

Ahhhhh. I didn't catch that the first time 'round. Thats perfect! Lets the Economics Commisar get a full picture of needs before he has to start making decisions. And with overall advice from the Marshal as to which Fronts are most important to hold/ build up at the time, the decision becomes more clear.

I would suggest that Front Commanders denote priority when requisitioning rushbuilding. Just because you have asked for a Red Guard to be built in one city in the Front's rear doesn't mean that the possibly higher priority AA Battery should be overlooked to complete the less expensive Guards.

Of course the Armamenst Commisar needs to utalize incremental rushbuying as well, saves us some dukes.

-FMK.

[goape]

sorry wrong post

[Colwyn]

My family were in the SU count me in too

This is good idea, if anyone is interest I have done a RF1.4b (lot harder) with some different rule changes and events.

[Shaka Naldur]

Henrik,

i think even more than that,
the marshall
6 front comanders,
and i don't know if the ural cities comanders is going to move too.
that it is 7 people to move
and they have to ask the people and make polls!!!

a turn can take easily two weeks, but if the majority agrees...

[H Tower]

Re: My family were in the SU count me in too

Originally posted by Colwyn
anyone is interest I have done a RF1.4b (lot harder) with some different rule changes and events.

Hearsay! Burn the heretic!

[CivGeneral]

How Often are Elections held. Since I am iterested in partisipating more in this Demogame .

[H Tower]

we haven't decided yet. At least a month though, maybe two. It depends on how fast the game moves along. And of course the front commanders can be selected and sacked at will by the Marshal

[Master Zen]

I'm sorry to inform that due to my increasing committment with the ISDG and the PTWDG I will not be able to participate in a meaninful manner in the RFDG.

maybe if I have time later on...

-Master Zen

[Shaka Naldur]

the way we are going to play it will be better to change the goverment every few turns rather than using the time

[Colwyn]

Wouldn't it be really cool to:

ignore

[CivGeneral]

I have a Question:

Are there going to be Periodic Elections happening in this Game? I am curious since I would like to be in one of the Upper Positions.

Thanks,
CivGeneral

[Shaka Naldur]

yes, we don´t know yet but every few turn or by time

but we´ll change the goverment every once in a while

[The ANZAC]

Since there seem to be many people interested in this, there aren't many spots currently, and we need a system of gov't change every once in a while, why not setup a CEC (Central Executive Committee)? The CEC really existed in the Soviet Union and it could act as sort of a political intermediary to make things a little interesting. For example, they could sack the Marshal, etc. And the head would obviously be the party chairman.

Ah, gotta love Soviet bureacracy

[The ANZAC]

As there seems to apathy/lack of action over the selection of Field Marshal of the Soviet Union, I propose the following: We establish a CEC as I said above. I will be the chairman and hopefully 4 other people will join me. Then from that we will discuss and decide who should be marshal. Sounds reasonable?