Should it be mandatory that underline cannot be used to emphasise?

[FlameFlash]

Banana rules!

oh... and I don't care... especially here with the blueness... if underlines get done for links as well as the colors then I could understand it.

[Jamski]

IS IT really IMPORTANT how you EMPHASISE things, as long as EVERYBODY knows exactly what AND which words are more IMPORTANT? Really?



-Jam

[ixnay]

WELL SAID

[FrustratedPoet]

WoA: You know you 've spent too much time on Apolyton when you bother write a post like this....

IS IT really IMPORTANT how you EMPHASISE things, as long as EVERYBODY knows exactly what AND which words are more IMPORTANT? Really?

[FlameFlash]

Agree wholeheartedly WoA

[Dauphin]

It reads like a poison pen letter made out of magazine clippings.

[Alex]

What's the problem with underlining a text, or a simple word or two? Just hover your mouse over the underlined text and you'll see if it is a link or not. (Given the way how links are displayed here, I suppose that it is something easy to discern.)

[August Borms]

It looks ugly.

[Straybow]

Smartass +1

Well, the color of Apolyton link text is subtle, and Apolyton links aren't underlined. So why is this an issue at all?

[DaShi]

But admit it, how many of you still click on the underlined text, just to make sure?

[Dauphin]

I don't.

[Jamski]

Thanks, it took about 15mins to type all the HTML tags

-Jam

[Panag]

hi ,

bananas

who cares , what's with all these changing stuff poll's , ....

have a nice day

[badams52]

Originally posted by DaShi
But admit it, how many of you still click on the underlined text, just to make sure?

I just hover over the area in question.

Banana with a big lead !!! wohoo!

[Urban Ranger]

At least there are people who admit that they are stoopid.