test

[MarkG]

testing

[FrustratedPoet]

looks like it was a successful test.

instead of writing:

(Time out:5 days after 05-11-2002, 20:29)

why not go for:

(Time out: 10-11-2002, 20:29)

[Method]

either way, this is great!

[-Jrabbit]

AWESOME!

Instead of
blah (Time out:5 days after 05-11-2002, 14:29)

I suggest:
(Poll ends: 5 days after 05-11-2002, 14:29 GMT)

[ixnay]

Cool, I like it.

[Skanky Burns]

Nice feature, certainly will be useful for all those Democracy Games.

[Mercator]

Originally posted by -Jrabbit
Instead of
blah (Time out:5 days after 05-11-2002, 14:29)

I suggest:
(Poll ends: 5 days after 05-11-2002, 14:29 GMT)

The timezone indication wouldn't be necessary, since it's your local time (as specified in your options). At least, that's what I think it is, considering FrustratedPoet apparently sees 20:49, you see 14:29 and I see 21:29.

[Cyclotron]

Well, I voted for bah 2, the clearly superior blah.

By the way, I agree with FP... wouldn't just stating the end date be easier?

[CapitanGarlic]

I hold with the belief that blah3 is the proverbial 'bomb'.

either way,

[H Tower]

it would be nice if it showed up after you had finished voting too though, so you could see how long the poll will last after you vote

[H Tower]

and thats blah3(TM)

[Skanky Burns]

Agreed, it would be nice for those of us who have voted to be able to see when it ends.
I'm pretty sure it's based upon our timezone - mine said 06-11-2002, 7:29 or something similar. I have voted though, so can't check.

Vote 1 for Blah2!!

[Gangerolf]

blah1, definately

[Tuberski]

Blah 4, the other three blahs are just...........blah!

ACK!

[FrustratedPoet]

I'm remaining blah-neutral. In typical liberal style I'm happy to sit on the fence indefinitely.