I've only ever won once and I cant even remember how it's that long since I've played it. I just gave up and started playing all my older games like civ and col. Which are in a way better then civ3. Civ is just civ with no annoying bits tacked on to the side. It's a nice war game. Civ2 made a really good go at making the game more then that and survived for over 5 years. If I start up a game now I'd probably play it through till the end. Civ 3 aimed too high and missed by a long shot.
If you want a good example of what I was hoping civ3 would be more like try EU2. I'd tell anyone who was dissapointed in civ3 to go get that game it's a lot lot better. This game has been made by the players who knew what they wanted.
I hope with EU and RoN that that's the way the gaming industry is going now. They might have finally gotten the message that players want good games not just more crap they should have given us 5 years ago.
If you want a good example of what I was hoping civ3 would be more like try EU2. I'd tell anyone who was dissapointed in civ3 to go get that game it's a lot lot better. This game has been made by the players who knew what they wanted.
I hope with EU and RoN that that's the way the gaming industry is going now. They might have finally gotten the message that players want good games not just more crap they should have given us 5 years ago.
Comment