A lot of you people are worrying about the petty differences between civilization 2 (or 3) and CtP2. You people are missing the bigger picture. Can Civ 1 hold its own against a similar title such as half-life?
i, for one, can't believe your narrow-mindedness. just because half-life doesn't have "cities" or "civilizations" or even a single similar concept doesn't mean that we can't argue, bicker, or hurl insults at each other until we decide which game is better.
so i want to see you people out there duking it out, and decide which game holds the title of "The Ultimate Turn-Based Strategy Game."
i, for one, can't believe your narrow-mindedness. just because half-life doesn't have "cities" or "civilizations" or even a single similar concept doesn't mean that we can't argue, bicker, or hurl insults at each other until we decide which game is better.
so i want to see you people out there duking it out, and decide which game holds the title of "The Ultimate Turn-Based Strategy Game."
Comment