Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

how much would be willing to pya for an apolyton without ads?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • how much would be willing to pya for an apolyton without ads?

    and i'm not suggesting that the free version would be full of pop-ups

    so, since someone suggested in another thread, how much would you pay for a year of access to apolyton without ads?


    <u>dislaimer: i have no clue if and how this could be achievable with our current structure</u>
    <font size=1 face=Arial color=444444>[This message has been edited by MarkG (edited March 12, 2001).]</font>

  • #2
    I'd be willing to pay up to about 50 US dollars a year. Maybe more if CIV III is good or it was critical to the survival of the site.

    But, my fear would be that charges would make quite a few of the younger posters quit due to economic reasons. And more importantly, fewer new members, since they wouldn't get a chance to browse and get sucked into the community so they wouldn't realize the value. And variety is what makes this site so popular. (and content of course)

    I would suggest not making it mandatory and asking for sponsers. I believe that the people that could afford it would, and those that can't wouldn't lose access to such a wonderful site. This way, you wouldn't have to worry about the technical aspects.

    If times get even tighter, please ask for donations first. You might be surprised at how many people would come through. But Please, don't make it mandatory.

    RAH
    I could see it now, Civ II multiplayer, sponsered by the Ferrets.
    It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
    RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

    Comment


    • #3
      <center><table width=80%><tr><td><font color=000080 face="Verdana" size=2><font size="1">quote:
      <img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
      </font><font size=1>Originally posted by rah on 03-12-2001 09:22 AM</font>
      But, my fear would be that charges would make quite a few of the younger posters quit due to economic reasons
      <img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>oh, i'm not suggesting that the access would be limited only to paying members.

      i'm just asking, "how much would you pay to not see the ads"(that would be the basic stuff, perhaps the "package" could include more than that). i'm not suggesting to excluse those who will say "0"...

      as for the donations thing, if you give me two visions of the future, in which one is that lots of people are paying small amount and get something back(beyond the existance of the site) and the other is that few people are paying many more money to keep something alive, i prefer the first...

      Comment


      • #4
        Well, I donated a few hundred hours over the past two years. Times that by my tutoring salary of $100 / hour (yes, my real fee...but is it worth it? ). So I'd say moderators already donate enough.

        My non-moderator answer would be to keep this simple: Ask EVERYBODY to send you $1-5 (or more) for 2001. You'll make a big, obvious list of "contributors" with the donated amount next to it. Everybody on that list would automatically qualify for entries in prizes, etc. The top 5 donators would be given some other form of prize/recognition (maybe even a feature "vanity" page complete with photos or whatever?).

        Of course, donating money wouldn't release people from following Apolyton rules or getting any other special treatment...
        I've been on these boards for a long time and I still don't know what to think when it comes to you -- FrantzX, December 21, 2001

        "Yin": Your friendly, neighborhood negative cosmic force.

        Comment


        • #5
          The regular ads don't bother me much, and I even click on them once in a "blue moon".

          It's the pop-ups that are iritating me. (what a surprise)

          I'd be will to pay a nominal amount per year to avoid pop-ups. And if that included the regular ads, it would be an added bonus. But since they don't bother me, I'd rather you get max hits on those to not further reduce your revenue.

          Whatever, I'd pay to help the site. And have no problem with the more well off members supporting for the sake of the others. (I'm sure there's a joke in there somewhere about the Bush tax cut, but I'll leave it for NC.)

          RAH
          It's almost as if all his overconfident, absolutist assertions were spoonfed to him by a trusted website or subreddit. Sheeple
          RIP Tony Bogey & Baron O

          Comment


          • #6
            The problem with a fee is that it changes the position of everyone from "viewers" to "customers". Once you've paid your fee, you will be placing a demand on the service in return. If you were banned of the forums, for example, would you get your fee back?

            I still favour the donations/shareware model.

            Comment


            • #7
              Even without reducing the ads, which neither bother me nor materially affect my page loading, I will pay several hundred dollars. Nor would I need any altered membership status for a subscription or recognition; y ego is fully developed and needs no nourishment. And of course Yin, Ming could whack me just as hard with his banning rod, indeed, since I am an old man, I expect to be held to higher standards of behavior than children (this does not necessarily mean that I would ALWAYS refrain fron cruelly savaging some poster for the pure pleasure of it, only that I would accept the the penalty therefore with out whining). I spend more time here than I do on cable TV, movies, and some other entertainments combined.
              Should E-mail communication on this subject be addressed to Dan Q or Mark G?

              ------------------
              Gaius Mucius Scaevola Sinistra
              Pontificator Pendanticus
              older richer & wiser than you
              Did I mention that I like spellcheckers?
              Gaius Mucius Scaevola Sinistra
              Japher: "crap, did I just post in this thread?"
              "Bloody hell, Lefty.....number one in my list of persons I have no intention of annoying, ever." Bugs ****ing Bunny
              From a 6th grader who readily adpated to internet culture: "Pay attention now, because your opinions suck"

              Comment


              • #8
                $0.00

                That's why I like looking at other alternatives.
                I came upon a barroom full of bad Salon pictures in which men with hats on the backs of their heads were wolfing food from a counter. It was the institution of the "free lunch" I had struck. You paid for a drink and got as much as you wanted to eat. For something less than a rupee a day a man can feed himself sumptuously in San Francisco, even though he be a bankrupt. Remember this if ever you are stranded in these parts. ~ Rudyard Kipling, 1891

                Comment


                • #9
                  I'm afraid I wouldn't wish to pay at all. Pay web sites turn me off. There are other forums besides Apolyton, and I would just go there. I like this one because it is very active, but with a fee I think the number of subscribers would drop quite dramatically. Who wants to pay for something that they always got for free? We all b*tch and whine about those damn e-bay adds, but they will eventually pass. A little research in to the sucess of pay sites is in order. As far as I know, only porn sites make any money from subscribers. I could be wrong, but I don't think so.

                  ------------------
                  All knowledge begins with the phrase: I don't know.
                  I believe Saddam because his position is backed up by logic and reason...David Floyd
                  i'm an ignorant greek...MarkG

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    I play some online game now(utopia). And they have a very interesting way to cause people to press on the advertisments which are NOT pictures, and NOT pop ups but only a few words.

                    There are two advertisments, if you press on one you will get acres bonus(Kingdom Building game ) and if you press on the other one you will get food bonus. But there is a limit of one bonus per day.


                    The bonus are pretty significant and the vast majority of the players are clicking on those ads!


                    So maybe a similar concept can work in Apolyton.


                    ------------------
                    Builder.

                    "Antisemites? They are just the descendants of monkeys and are jealous of the descendants of Adam and Eve"

                    "The length of a minute depends on which side of the toilet door you're on"
                    "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master" - Commissioner Pravin Lal.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      An increase in the post count of one for every unique click-through! You never need tell the advertisers...

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        What is to become of those (like me) who arent old enough to have credit cards?
                        No Fighting here, this is the war room!

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          henrik, see the bolded text two posts above...

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            It's not the ads I mind, it's the pop up/java stuff that bugs me.

                            Ever thought about freelancing your some of your ad space and selling to the highest bidder? I rarely, if ever, click on an apolyton ad that's supplied by UGO, but when I'm browsing Planetout, I click on ads all the time. They're not porn ads either! Just shopping stuff like kleptomaniac.com.
                            Exult in your existence, because that very process has blundered unwittingly on its own negation. Only a small, local negation, to be sure: only one species, and only a minority of that species; but there lies hope. [...] Stand tall, Bipedal Ape. The shark may outswim you, the cheetah outrun you, the swift outfly you, the capuchin outclimb you, the elephant outpower you, the redwood outlast you. But you have the biggest gifts of all: the gift of understanding the ruthlessly cruel process that gave us all existence [and the] gift of revulsion against its implications.
                            -Richard Dawkins

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Given my lifelong contribution I expect you to pay me
                              <font size=1 face=Arial color=444444>[This message has been edited by Gibsie (edited March 12, 2001).]</font>

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X