Announcement

**axi** · January 10, 2001, 16:45

K
2-Kaak
2-KarstenWilli
8-Kautilya
1-Khan Singh
2-KrAzYCoMMiE
1-Krushala
2-Kuma no Tsume
1-Kyle
3-kwang

L
23-Lancer
2-Lazarus and the Gimp
4-Legman
1-LightEning
12-Lincoln
1-Linzen
2-L o k i
3-LordStone1
1-Lul Thyme

M
20-Mao
1-markusf
9-Mark L
20-MarkG
4-MasterBob
1-MattHiggs
3-MichaeltheGreat
2-Midshipman
3-MikeH
1-mindseye
5-Ming
4-MLeonard
4-MOBIUS
3-Monk
1-Monkey
1-Murgatroyd
10-My Wife Hates CIV

N
6-Narck
12-n.c.
2-neilinoz
20-Nimrod
7-Nordicus

O
1-OhWell
2-onepaul
6-OrangeSfwr
1-Orcus
1-Outlaw
2-OzzyKP

P
1-Par4
1-Paul Hanson
1-pchang
1-pchang65
1-Pericles
1-Phantom
1-phoenixcager
6-Probbka
1-problem_child
1-Procopius
1-Prometeus
3-ProvostB
6-Provost Harrison
1-Pythagoras

R
1-rah
2-RainbowJDS
2-Ramo
2-Rand Al'Tor
1-Rasputin00
19-reismark
9-Roland

S
3-Sahib
2-sammyboy7
1-Scott F
2-Seeker
3-Seneca
2-Sergeant Sheets
1-Sir David
1-sleeperservice
1-SmartFart
2-SnowFire
2-Spoe
2-Starchild
2-Stefan Hartel
23-Stefu
2-Sten Sture
1-Stimpleton84
1-stodlum
1-Stoel

T
1-Taal A. Chaykin
1-Tear of the Komsomol Girl
1-technophile
1-techumseh
1-Ted Bundy's Volkswagon
1-Teekay
1-tfs99
1-theAdversary
2-Theben
2-The Brain
1-The Call of Snapcase
3-The Mad Monk
1-The Mad Viking
1-Themistocles the Athenian
1-The Unconquered
2-Thucydides
1-Thue
2-Tiamat
2-Timexwatch
4-TNapoleon
2-Trappist
1-Tyrant Lizard King

U
4-Urban Ranger

V
4-Victor
2-Victor Galis
1-vlad

W
1-War4ever
1-Warning:
2-WarVoid
2-waynehead
4-werefox
1-wesley32
1-Wezil
4-Wraith

Z
4-Zkribbler
2-Zulu Elephant

**axi** · January 10, 2001, 16:59

What this FAQ is for:

Well, I was intrigued by AH's complaints that he was unable to start a respectable topic. I commented that that was untrue and that browsing the OT archives would prove that. I then got the idea of counting how many archived topics has each poster started. This took me a few hours, of course, but I had that irresistible urge...

This FAQ may be useful as one (imperfect of course but still much better than any other I know of) way to compare the quality of the OT posters. You see, getting in the archives, almost equals immortality, in electronic terms. For those people that care for such things, I guess that this will be invaluable. I do not wish to make further comments on this, however.

Of course this has to be updated somehow, when more threads get archived, so if Mark, Dan, or Narck want it to keep existing, they can post updates (the easiest way is to be updated by the person who archives the threads themselves). Similar FAQs for other section's archives can be posted too.

Just for the record, AH is indeed one of the top ranking topic-starters. So no worries, horsey!

Also, I you haven't noticed, Yours Truly has 0 topics in the archive so far.

------------------
"In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act."
George Orwell

**Lazarus & the Gimp** · January 10, 2001, 17:13

<center><table width=80%><tr><td><font color=000080 face="Verdana" size=2><font size="1">quote:
<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
</font><font size=1>Originally posted by axi on 01-10-2001 03:59 PM</font>
This FAQ may be useful as one (imperfect of course but still much better than any other I know of) way to compare the quality of the OT posters. You see, getting in the archives, almost equals immortality, in electronic terms. For those people that care for such things, I guess that this will be invaluable. I do not wish to make further comments on this, however.

<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>

I'm surprised I got 4 threads in the archives, as I don't tend to start many. On the whole I prefer contributing to other people's, but I wouldn't say that fact relegates me to the status of "low quality".

However my filthy sense of humour might...

**Ming** · January 10, 2001, 17:25

Interesting... but...

There are a couple of reasons for a thread to be archived.
1) Somebody sends a request to an Admin or Mod, and they feel it is worth while (very liberal judgement)

2) An Admin or Mod thinks something is worth saving
(very rare event)

3) (and MarkG can correct me) When threads are deleted in course of normal housecleaning, the longer threads are sometimes archived instead of a deleted.
Since there are many threads that have to be deleted, it is difficult to make a decision on a thread by thread basis... number of posts, and title probably are the determining point.
In the Civ forums, I always read through the threads before I delete them. If they have any long term value, I archive them, and then delete the rest. However, this is far more difficult on the OTF because of the total number of threads.

So to place any "value" or "opinion" on the number of threads archived by poster... well, it's a stretch at best

**Ari Rahikkala** · January 10, 2001, 18:37

Posters that are the same person:

Apathetic Dreamer and connorkimbro, currently connorkimbro.

Emperor Craetsezar, Chris EvC, Cuteguy27 and Evan Von Christoph, currently EVC.

AI and Provost Harrison, currently Provost Harrison.

Arthur Dent and Imran Siddiqui, currently Imran Siddiqui.

Djugashvili and Cutiegirl11 .

D2K and Derek, currently Derek as far as I know.

Fallen Angel Lord and Masterbob, currently Archangel Masterbob.

(more soon...)

**Ari Rahikkala** · January 10, 2001, 18:44

Add The Unconquered to connorkimbro logins.

Hans the Hun and KarstenWilli, currently: unknown.

Hugo Rune and The Call of Snapcase, currently: Snapcase on Snapcase, as far as I know.

... and that's all I can remember just now. I'm pretty sure I left some holes.
<font size=1 face=Arial color=444444>[This message has been edited by LightEning (edited January 10, 2001).]</font>

**TCO** · January 10, 2001, 20:27

A lot of those archived threads were requested by the originator. Quality is not nesessarily the discrimanator. (Desire to have name in lights is.) If you could tell which threads were archived other than by request of the originator that would be a good quality metric.

**Alexander's Horse** · January 10, 2001, 21:13

Not many of mine seem to get archived - I start as many as anyone. GRRR!!

------------------
Chaos, panic and disorder - My work here is done.

Keep the OT sticky thread free!!

**TCO** · January 10, 2001, 21:29

Just start requesting it, like Lancer does.

**MarkG** · January 10, 2001, 21:33

as ming said, the choice depends on me remembering that that was a good thread and/or having many posts and/or having a title that suggests that it is a good thread.
perhaps not the best criteria, but i'm not giving any oscars either...

**DarkCloud** · January 10, 2001, 21:58

Good work Axi, how long did it take you to make this thread?

I thought I had more threads however:

such as:

forum?
Apolyton- The Book
Alphabetical list of posters
Best poster for each letter of the alphabet

and more...

**DarkCloud** · January 10, 2001, 22:11

I finally managed to get one of my topics archived-

Apolyton HAll of Fame
<a href="http://apolyton.net/forums/Archives/Archive-000002/HTML/20010101-23-018496.html">http://apolyton.net/forums/Archives/Archive-000002/HTML/20010101-23-018496.html</a>

------------------
Apolyton- The Book (Webpage and Topic Thread)
http://apolyton.net/forums/Forum23/HTML/018747

Visit the Civgaming Network Forums:
http://www.civgaming.net

Visit Apolyton- The Book (The Website for the people of Apolyton)
http://home.att.net/~sjcfg/main.html

**tonic** · January 10, 2001, 22:58

Hmm...not in the archives and relegated to
oblivion. Such is e-life!

**Narck** · January 10, 2001, 23:51

<center><table width=80%><tr><td><font color=000080 face="Verdana" size=2><font size="1">quote:
<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
</font><font size=1>Originally posted by axi on 01-10-2001 03:59 PM</font>
Of course this has to be updated somehow, when more threads get archived, so if Mark, Dan, or Narck want it to keep existing, they can post updates
<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>Uhhhh...

No thanks My own FAQ is enough work as it is

Announcement

OT topic-starters FAQ

OT topic-starters FAQ

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment