Who has been deleting my threads??? GRRRRR!!!

[Alexander's Horse]

I dug out a couple of old OT threads from the back pages in the last 10 hours and someone deleted them

What is the justification for deleting perfectly legitimate threads with many posts???


<font size=1 face=Arial color=444444>[This message has been edited by Alexander's Horse (edited August 16, 2000).]</font>

[Urban Ranger]

Are you sure they were deleted, or has just sunk back down to the bottom?

[Alexander's Horse]

Definitely deleted. Probably Ming being super net nanny again. One was a really good thread

[Ming]

I deleted all three of the ones you resurected. When you bring back a thread or two from the ancient past, and actually add something meaningful to it... it's OK.
Plus, I can understand when people have been gone for a period of time, and want to continue discussions that they had started.

But you brought back three old threads that deserved their fate of dropping faster than a rock, and added nothing new to the discussion. All three threads were over a month old. All it did was add three threads on the first page with your name on them.

People have earned vacations in the past for just that activity. I call it spamming!

------------------
Ming
CivII & Off-Topic Forum Moderator
Ming@Apolyton.net

[Hydey]

Ming cuts Horse some slack by not giving him a vacation and Horse sooks about it.

Now Ming will be mad at us all , thanks Horse.

[Alexander's Horse]

<center><table width=80%><tr><td><font color=000080 face="Verdana" size=2><font size="1">quote:
<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
</font><font size=1>Originally posted by Ming on 08-16-2000 08:09 AM</font>
I deleted all three of the ones you resurected.


<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>

I brought back 3 threads, 2 on the English theme, one on fish and chips and the other on the English accent because my post for the day was on an English theme. I found them when I was looking for the thread I wanted, which was on theology.

<center><table width=80%><tr><td><font color=000080 face="Verdana" size=2><font size="1">quote:
<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
</font>

When you bring back a thread or two from the ancient past, and actually add something meaningful to it... it's OK.


<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>

That is what I did, in all cases replying to posts from other people.

<center><table width=80%><tr><td><font color=000080 face="Verdana" size=2><font size="1">quote:
<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
</font>

Plus, I can understand when people have been gone for a period of time, and want to continue discussions that they had started.


<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>

Well I haven't been around much lately, my children have been sick and I did want to continue the discussion.

<center><table width=80%><tr><td><font color=000080 face="Verdana" size=2><font size="1">quote:
<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
</font>

But you brought back three old threads that deserved their fate of dropping faster than a rock, and added nothing new to the discussion.


<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>

That's the trouble with your moderation lately, too many value judgements. Enforce the FAQ, that's your job.

<center><table width=80%><tr><td><font color=000080 face="Verdana" size=2><font size="1">quote:
<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
</font>

People have earned vacations in the past for just that activity. I call it spamming!


<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>

Get real Ming, the job has gone to your head. Sadly, you were just breaking my balls as usual these days. You need a rest. Your ideas on what is spam are starting to border on the bizarre.



<font size=1 face=Arial color=444444>[This message has been edited by Alexander's Horse (edited August 16, 2000).]</font>

[Ming]

Actually, I didn't really cut him any slack.

When I saw the three threads, I checked ICQ to see if he was on line so that I could warn him that one more such thread would earn him a vacation. When I saw that he wasn't online, and that no more old threads had appeared, I just deleted the three spam threads and waited for him to complain about it here the next time he came on line

He is so predictable

------------------
Ming
CivII & Off-Topic Forum Moderator
Ming@Apolyton.net

[Alexander's Horse]

<center><table width=80%><tr><td><font color=000080 face="Verdana" size=2><font size="1">quote:
<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
</font><font size=1>Originally posted by Ming on 08-16-2000 09:39 AM</font>

He is so predictable


<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>


And so are you - the next thing you'll be accusing me of whining.

Why didn't you send me a private message? I was at work.

And pay no attention to Hydey, we just had a little disagreement in MP. This is his payback. Thanks son.

[Ming]

AH...
Well, you are whining

As far as you bringing those threads back, you had had plenty of time to continue those discussions in the MONTH that they were dropping like rocks. And, the comments you added were all one liners that added nothing.
All you did was add three threads to the first page with your name attached to them.

And yes, the job of moderating is a matter of judgement and opinion. People have been warned and given vacations in the past for exactly what you were doing. You have been treated no better or no worse. Fair is fair!

And there really was no need to send you a private message, since as expected, you started a thread here to complain like you always do when one of your threads get deleted

------------------
Ming
CivII & Off-Topic Forum Moderator
Ming@Apolyton.net

[Alexander's Horse]

<center><table width=80%><tr><td><font color=000080 face="Verdana" size=2><font size="1">quote:
<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
</font><font size=1>Originally posted by Ming on 08-16-2000 09:56 AM</font>
AH...
Well, you are whining


<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>

see?

<center><table width=80%><tr><td><font color=000080 face="Verdana" size=2><font size="1">quote:
<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
</font>

As far as you bringing those threads back, you had had plenty of time to continue those discussions in the MONTH that they were dropping like rocks.


<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>

Firstly, it wasn't anything like a month, the archive that I can access only goes back a week or so. Secondly, I didn't have anything to add until today. I think I explained why I wanted them - the English ones for the theme and the theology one beacuse it was a such a good thread.

<center><table width=80%><tr><td><font color=000080 face="Verdana" size=2><font size="1">quote:
<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
</font> And, the comments you added were all one liners that added nothing.


<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>

In your opinion, that's the problem. You're not enforcing the faq. Under the guise of alleged spam you are just censoring and enforcing your own tastes.

<center><table width=80%><tr><td><font color=000080 face="Verdana" size=2><font size="1">quote:
<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
</font>

All you did was add three threads to the first page with your name attached to them.


<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>

Why would I want to do that?

<center><table width=80%><tr><td><font color=000080 face="Verdana" size=2><font size="1">quote:
<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
</font>

And yes, the job of moderating is a matter of judgement and opinion.


<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>

Not the kind of judgements your making.


<center><table width=80%><tr><td><font color=000080 face="Verdana" size=2><font size="1">quote:
<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1>
</font>

And there really was no need to send you a private message, since as expected, you started a thread here to complain like you always do when one of your threads get deleted


<img src="/images/blue1.gif" width=100% height=1></font></td></tr></table></center>

Ho ho ho, if you had contacted me I would have said fair enough, I think I know why you really did it, but I would have said save the theology thread. The loss of that really annoyed me. You left some threads that were less important but deleted that one!!

I'm, going to bed now. So I guess you can have the last word as usual.

[finbar]

Phew! Means I can go to bed, too. Get up in the morning and catch up on the very latest in the Itchy & Scratchy Hour!

------------------
finbar
Mono Rules!
#33984591

[Ming]

"Firstly, it wasn't anything like a month, the archive that I can access only goes back a week or so."

Well, I disagree. The dates of the last post before yours on all those threads were around July 12th.

"Secondly, I didn't have anything to add until today.

You had a month to add to them... are you getting slow in your advancing age

"I think I explained why I wanted them - the English ones for the theme and the theology one beacuse it was a such a good thread."

It was such a good thread that it dropped like a rock and hadn't had a response in over a month.

"In your opinion, that's the problem. You're not enforcing the faq. Under the guise of
alleged spam you are just censoring and enforcing your own tastes"

Now that is your opinion. Every time somebody has done what you did, I have deleted the threads. It's not a matter of taste, or I would have deleted those threads when you first started them.

"Ho ho ho, if you had contacted me I would have said fair enough, I think I know why you
really did it, but I would have said save the theology thread. The loss of that really
annoyed me. You left some threads that were less important but deleted that one!!"

Well, I did check to see if you were on ICQ... when you weren't, I assumed a PM wouldn't work either... my mistake.
And why did I really do it? I think I have answered that question about 3 or 4 times already... just being consistent with past actions. And I deleted all the resurected threads I could find. The less important threads you must be talking about were all recent threads... and there was no reason to delete them.

And as far as getting in the last word, you will be awake again sometime in the future

[Caesar]

You see, when you want to find threads to spam...

First you have to find a thread that you started, it makes it MUCH less obvious. Secondly, don't pick two things with very similar topics. And space it out over about an hour. Better yet, get someone else to join you in "posting" so its MUCH less obvious. By doing all that, you can barely tell that you brought it up for spam.

There goes one of my tricks

Second of all... well, I forgot...

[SuperSneak]

Hmmmm....I think the theology one could have had the merit to be resurrected (no pun intended).
I didn't realize we weren't allowed to bring back old threads...if there is an interest, let it ride.
I can see how this could be a device in the hands of pointless spammers, though...I don't think Horse really fits that bill. Megalomaniac, yes, puckered sphincter, yes...spammer, no.
Sigh.
I've said it before: Hay es no democracia.
Just start a thread with a similar theme, Horse. Mao does it every 8 hours with the Coffee shop. Now, that's some intellectual stimulation!

------------------
Bring it!

"Do not act as if you would live ten thousand years. Death hangs over you. While you live, while it is in your power, be good." Marcus Aurelius (Meditations)

[Ming]

You misunderstand...
It is ok to bring up old threads. I have no problem with that. What I do have a problem with is when multiple old threads are resurrected by the same person in a short time frame for no apparent reason. Yes, the theology thread was not too bad, but the others were simple spam that had fallen like a rock, as they deserved. Whenever a pattern like this begins, I just start deleting, and then warn the person if it continues.

------------------
Ming
CivII & Off-Topic Forum Moderator
Ming@Apolyton.net