Ad-Free Apolyton: THE POLL

[Daz]

I can live with the ads. Keep'em coming!!!

[MrBaggins]

Originally posted by Tamerlin
*SNIP*
Paying to get rid off ads is not really the problem as far as I am concerned, I am actually afraid that this would be the beginning of a new process leading to a fully paying site.
*SNIP*

Absolutely agree.

Its a slippery slope... plus you start to intrude more into the privacy area when you charge (particularly by credit card)... each user becomes more identifiable than a dynamic IP plus cookie.

No, thanks.

[MarkG]

Originally posted by Harry Tuttle
MarkG, not to be off topic from the paying subscriber idea, but have you ever been approached from a company wanting to do a promotion on the site? Like an active give away contest, or a themed promotional period for a movie, game, etc..? I know some promotions involve the annoying popup or entrance screen before you can proceed to the forum, but has anything else been discussed?

There have been 1-2 occasions that we run ads that came after a more direct deal with the advertised instead of through an ad network.

i suppose we could use an ad inventory sales team

[MarkG]

Originally posted by My Wife Hates CIV
what's the price (even a ball park estimate)??? what are the goodies??? what kinda of sorry sales job is this.

this was an introductory marketing research effort

as a member of apolyton for years now (and the holder of the best name), one would think posters like myself would get a price break or first years membership free. remember - it's the loyal posters that have made apolyton what it is - it's almost more my site than markg's.

this is actually a pretty interesting idea

[MarkG]

Originally posted by Tamerlin
Paying to get rid off ads is not really the problem as far as I am concerned, I am actually afraid that this would be the beginning of a new process leading to a fully paying site.

- the "full paying" sites idea has failed.
- the "partially free content / partially non-free content" idea requires a much much much larger initial audience (gamespot, salon, etc) to start with

offering services is actually the only viable way to go for us...

[MarkG]

Originally posted by MrBaggins
Its a slippery slope... plus you start to intrude more into the privacy area when you charge (particularly by credit card)... each user becomes more identifiable than a dynamic IP plus cookie.

No, thanks.

since 1996 (that the predecessor sites of apolyton begun), Dan and I have been storing thousands of people's e-mail addresses. the indication that we would anything with user personal data is actually insulting

[MrBaggins]

Originally posted by MarkG
since 1996 (that the predecessor sites of apolyton begun), Dan and I have been storing thousands of people's e-mail addresses. the indication that we would anything with user personal data is actually insulting

Nevertheless, I'd say that a financial transaction requires disclosure of a lot more than just an (free anonymous in my case) email address. I've seperated out any online activity not requiring financial information, and use different individually created email accts for financial transactions.

[Spiffor]

Originally posted by MrBaggins
Its a slippery slope... plus you start to intrude more into the privacy area when you charge (particularly by credit card)... each user becomes more identifiable than a dynamic IP plus cookie.

I thought the very interest of PayPal was that this company was entirely in charge of the information, and that there was no account info that transpired to the reciever.

[The Big Mc]

I don’t know if anybody has mentioned this, but sites with an add free charge often end up putting a lot of advertising junk on. This makes more people sign up for the ad free.

so I have voted no. if the vote goes the other way can we please have a promise to keep the amount of adverts we already have. I can’t afford any subscription fee and don’t want to be spammed into the stone age.

[alva]

I'm not going to search through two of these threads, but Mark or Dan has said that:
"If the subscription is succesfull, the adds for non-paying members might even go down"

There is a reason why this site the best on the net, you know

[Locutus]

What the people worried about this development don't seem to realize is that Markos and Dan do NOT care about the money. If they were in it for the money, Apolyton would never exist in the first place: they have explained us in the past that it used to be that the site (and it's predecessors) was actually loss-making, they had to throw in their own money just to keep it running. They were running it anyway, because they cared so much about it.

Time and time again have they refused to sell out while they had a perfect opportunity to do so. Countless times have they refused donations and the like (they are uncomfortable with the idea of getting something for nothing -- something some of the people here could learn something from), have they kicked out advertisers that published unacceptable ads (with spyware, porn or other undesirable content), have they paid the bills out of their own pockets, etc. If they were even remotely interested in the money, they wouldn't have done any of these things.

On top of that, they only wanted to offer this extra service after EXTENSIVE whining by people who want to get rid of the current pop-up and other ads, want a more reliable server/connection, or just want to be able to support the site more than is currently possible. And even now that they *are* planning to offer this service, they are even announcing that they will decrease the amount of ads for non-paying visitors as soon as the financial situation allows for it. They're obviously only interested in making enough money to ensure the survival of this site, nothing less but also nothing more.

This is not a slippery slope, nowhere near it. Anyone who even remotely knows these two great guys can tell you that, as far as Apolyton is concerned, making money is the very LAST thing on their minds. They only want to provide the best possible service to the Civ community, and if that means giving people the option to not see ads for a small fee, then they are willing to make the effort to make that possible. Not for their own sake, but for us, the visitors, the Civilization community.

[DrSpike]

Amen.

[PLATO]

(except I prefer "persuading" as opposed to "whining" )

[Bloody Monk]

Thank you, Locutus, that is what I tried to say. Mark and Dan are real hero types for all their effort. Hopefully, we can help share the load with our subscriptions.

Monk

[Skanky Burns]

Well said Locutus. I propose we put that block of text in bold above every thread in this post as well.