Civ4 Forums?

[vmxa1]

It was defacto announced by them. That cat is out of the bag now.

[Unspeakable Horror]

Originally posted by H Tower
They could always reopen the Civ3 Ideas forum, not too many of them were used

[Rasbelin]

Duh. I at least want to see some strong evidence, before I will trust that Firaxis is actually into Civ IV now. Maybe in the future, yes, but no credible evidence yet about Civ IV. I assume the confirmation will most likely be something stated by Atari, as they would be the publisher most likely.

[SpencerH]

Originally posted by H Tower
They could always reopen the Civ3 Ideas forum, not too many of them were used

I was just about to post the same idea.

[Skanky Burns]

We would want to discuss features we would like to see in Civ 4 before Firaxis even start the design stage of the game. Our ideas are hopefully to be used in this design stage.

[rah]

Hmmm, Civ 3's main problem was that they listened to us about corrections to CIV II. *sigh*

[Skanky Burns]

So who suggested animated leader heads?
I think a perma-ban is warrented.

[SpencerH]

My favorites were some of the hugely complex schemes for improving trade that included page after page of calculations etc.

[Rasputin]

Originally posted by rah
Hmmm, Civ 3's main problem was that they listened to us about corrections to CIV II. *sigh*

Yes too many people who never played MP made suggestions fopr the game that made it very hard for firaxis to make MP work... So civ 3 releaesed with out MP....


Again seems most people are clambering for SP changes so civ4 will again be mainly SP focused and not capable of MP...


I propose we dont ever maeka civ 4 forum, but i know it will happen. stupid suggestions will be tawekn on board and the game will never be waht we wanted..... but a new generation wil love it and calim the civ3 ers are old and fuddy duddys as the civ 3 ers do to the civ 2ers

[Asmodean]

Originally posted by Rasputin


Yes too many people who never played MP made suggestions fopr the game that made it very hard for firaxis to make MP work... So civ 3 releaesed with out MP....


Again seems most people are clambering for SP changes so civ4 will again be mainly SP focused and not capable of MP...


I propose we dont ever maeka civ 4 forum, but i know it will happen. stupid suggestions will be tawekn on board and the game will never be waht we wanted..... but a new generation wil love it and calim the civ3 ers are old and fuddy duddys as the civ 3 ers do to the civ 2ers

Rasputin and rah: I know this may come as a surprise.....but we don't all care for MP

Asmodean

[rah]

Yes, sadly most people would rather play against a predictable and easily beatable opponent. But then if people don't want to truely challange themselves, far be it for me to criticize them.

[SpencerH]

my sig speaks for itself on this question

[vmxa1]

Of all the copies of Civ out there, how may are used to play MP? One in 100, a 1000?

Yes I am in a demo game and participate in AU games, but most civ players do not even come to the boards.

[Asmodean]

Originally posted by rah
Yes, sadly most people would rather play against a predictable and easily beatable opponent. But then if people don't want to truely challange themselves, far be it for me to criticize them.

I never challange myself, as I don't know what that means

Asmodean

[rah]

Challange is the same as Challenge to everyone but the stinking spelling nazis.

But if that was the only problem you found with my statement......................................... ........

If civII was only SP, I would have stopped playing years ago. (Oh wait, I did, until MP came out)

Less than half a dozen games of civIII SP before it got boring too. Anyone can beat the AI once you figure out a few tricks. Where's the skill? Where is the challAnge? But I do understand that MP isn't for everyone. Some due to time constraints, and others due to mental constrainsts.