I thought it preferable to start a new thread for the whole discussion re a Yang or Zac vendetta, a Morgan pact or an Isolationist posture.
So much might hang on this decision that it needs to be fully aired.
Long-term pact with Morgan
This will likely, with hindsight, be regarded as the gamewinner for either ourselves or Morgan
If we take it as deep as I've suggested (to the level-9 techs), then left standing at the end of it will be ourselves, Morgan, and such AI submissives/pactmates or submissive human teams as we allow
After break-up, we will either try to conquer Morgan (a tough task by then) or else, if we have sustained the AI in a submissive role, try for a diplomatic victory (being declared sepreme leader)
The Morgan team might balk at being asked to commit so early (after all, they have only met the Hive and ourselves)
The playing enjoyment of the Angels and the Gaians might be lessened as a result of our joining with Morgan (and especially if we also co-opt Zak and Lal - much as the Hive-Drone alliance so early on decided the result in ACDG-II). Question: Do we care?
Pacting with Zak and possibly Lal as well
We have built our short term strategy on the expectation that we would lead a succession of probes thru Zakland, pilfering techs as we go.
Yet Yang has the tech lead, and both Zak and Lal have been forthcoming in trading techs (after all, we got GeneSplicing, Ethical Calculus and Secrets thru trades with the AI)
So let's discuss whether we should Pact with Zak (but still infiltrate, in case at any time he calls off the pact) and also with Lal (with similar infiltration)
This strategy might call for us to work 4-way research with Morgan as well, feeding Zak techs so that he will always be at the forefront of research. except, when he gets a tech that leads to a Special Project - that he starts - he won't trade it. (But the AI never uses crawlers to rush SP's so we could prolly catch up anyway)
Battling Yang versus battling Zak
This change of focus would lead us into a vendetta with Yang (it may be Zak's price for a pact). is this good or bad?
Consider:
Yang has the current tech lead, and has a tech we badly want - Doc Loyalty. To steal it will almost certainly trigger vendetta
Yang has some of the prime real estate on Planet - the Monsoon Jungle - which will default to the Gaians as they take the fight to the AI
We could talk up a good story if we joined with the Gaians in their fight with Yang, opening that famous "second front"
We'd be less threatening to the other factions (Angels and Gaians - presumably, if Pacted with Morgan, they'd be in our confidence) if we took on - with them - the strongest power rather than the weaker Zak or Lal
It'd be simpler to move overland with armies and probe consorts than ferrying them laboriously over the sea to Zak
Thoughts everyone?
So much might hang on this decision that it needs to be fully aired.
Long-term pact with Morgan
This will likely, with hindsight, be regarded as the gamewinner for either ourselves or Morgan
If we take it as deep as I've suggested (to the level-9 techs), then left standing at the end of it will be ourselves, Morgan, and such AI submissives/pactmates or submissive human teams as we allow
After break-up, we will either try to conquer Morgan (a tough task by then) or else, if we have sustained the AI in a submissive role, try for a diplomatic victory (being declared sepreme leader)
The Morgan team might balk at being asked to commit so early (after all, they have only met the Hive and ourselves)
The playing enjoyment of the Angels and the Gaians might be lessened as a result of our joining with Morgan (and especially if we also co-opt Zak and Lal - much as the Hive-Drone alliance so early on decided the result in ACDG-II). Question: Do we care?
Pacting with Zak and possibly Lal as well
We have built our short term strategy on the expectation that we would lead a succession of probes thru Zakland, pilfering techs as we go.
Yet Yang has the tech lead, and both Zak and Lal have been forthcoming in trading techs (after all, we got GeneSplicing, Ethical Calculus and Secrets thru trades with the AI)
So let's discuss whether we should Pact with Zak (but still infiltrate, in case at any time he calls off the pact) and also with Lal (with similar infiltration)
This strategy might call for us to work 4-way research with Morgan as well, feeding Zak techs so that he will always be at the forefront of research. except, when he gets a tech that leads to a Special Project - that he starts - he won't trade it. (But the AI never uses crawlers to rush SP's so we could prolly catch up anyway)
Battling Yang versus battling Zak
This change of focus would lead us into a vendetta with Yang (it may be Zak's price for a pact). is this good or bad?
Consider:
Yang has the current tech lead, and has a tech we badly want - Doc Loyalty. To steal it will almost certainly trigger vendetta
Yang has some of the prime real estate on Planet - the Monsoon Jungle - which will default to the Gaians as they take the fight to the AI
We could talk up a good story if we joined with the Gaians in their fight with Yang, opening that famous "second front"
We'd be less threatening to the other factions (Angels and Gaians - presumably, if Pacted with Morgan, they'd be in our confidence) if we took on - with them - the strongest power rather than the weaker Zak or Lal
It'd be simpler to move overland with armies and probe consorts than ferrying them laboriously over the sea to Zak
Thoughts everyone?
Comment