Announcement

**Haon** · May 17, 2003, 04:13

I think we should go for Info Net to get a Network Node so we can compete in teh scientific field. I would even go so far to suggest that for a short time we use "Knowledge" as our value choice untill we are more comfortable.

**Jamski** · May 17, 2003, 04:17

Wealth helps us more - it cancels out the minus on our economy to an acceptable level so that all the bases can contribute. -1 energy per base with Knowledge, -1 energy for only the HQ base with wealth. Also Wealth gives +1 industry too, IIRC. Also to get Knowledge we have to climb up a less optimal branch of the tech tree

-Jam

**Frankychan** · May 17, 2003, 04:24

I suggest Info Networks. This way we can hopefully speed up our research. I think that as soon as we have the chance, we should aim for Planned.

**Jamski** · May 17, 2003, 04:27

That would be Info Networks, something else, then Planetary Networks, then Frankychan. I agree.

-Jam

**Frankychan** · May 17, 2003, 04:30

**Jamski** · May 17, 2003, 04:33

Should read post before hitting send reply....
Should read post before hitting send reply....
Should read post before hitting send reply....
Should read post before hitting send reply....
Should read post before hitting send reply....
(x2000)

-Jam

**Static Universe** · May 17, 2003, 04:39

Re: Science discussion thread

Originally posted by War of Art
This thread is to advise our minister of Science what we think he should be researching, and WHY.

[real life]Comrade, you beat me to this thread by about 20 minutes. I planned to post it as soon as I got off work and my weekend officially started. (Yes, I work nights.)[/real life]

At the moment we are getting Centauri Ecology (for formers)

I reccomend that the next tech be either :

Biogenetics (for recyling tanks)

or

Information Networks (network node, leads directly to Planetary Networks - probe teams and PLANNED)

It probably won't always let us get two white techs (or any other colour) in a row though... so I would personally go for :

Info Networks,
Industrial base,
Planet Networks, change to PLANNED econ.
Industrial econ,
Doctrine : Mobility,
Industrial Automation(crawlers), change to WEALTH,
Doctrine : Loyalty, change to POLICE STATE.
And finally Biogenetics (Rec. Tanks)

In that order

This is (to me) the optimum way to get the right SE choices, crawlers, formers, the basic base facillities and we should have a lot of forests planted by then too

This is my "best starting plan" with the Hive.

I generally concur on the path, but prefer to have Rec Tanks in place before the switch to wealth, as the +1/+1/+1 is a boon to early growth and production. We may not be alone on this island.

**Jamski** · May 17, 2003, 04:56

The touble is that Biogenetics is a white tech, and the game won't always allow two consecutive techs from the same colour. It could be inserted between Doctrine : Mobility and Industrial Automation perhaps? Then all bases would have to get the rec tanks built before Ind Auto brings the crawlers (because then we'll want a lot of bases building crawlers, I suppose)

-Jam

**Static Universe** · May 17, 2003, 05:10

Originally posted by War of Art
The touble is that Biogenetics is a white tech, and the game won't always allow two consecutive techs from the same colour. It could be inserted between Doctrine : Mobility and Industrial Automation perhaps? Then all bases would have to get the rec tanks built before Ind Auto brings the crawlers (because then we'll want a lot of bases building crawlers, I suppose)

This seems like a good idea to me, as the +1 mineral is beneficial when crawler production begins, as is the +1 industry from wealth.

**Micha** · May 17, 2003, 09:34

But that should be the only concession we make before getting crawlers, right?
I want these admirable little thingies out as soon as possible!

**Static Universe** · May 17, 2003, 21:17

So does anyone *NOT* think that Information Networks is a good choice for second tech?

**Zero** · May 17, 2003, 21:57

how close are we with other factions? Depending on the answer to that and wether they may be friendly enough to trade or not. Our research path may change.

**Static Universe** · May 17, 2003, 22:21

Originally posted by Zero
how close are we with other factions? Depending on the answer to that and wether they may be friendly enough to trade or not. Our research path may change.

At this point we can't know. We only just finished the first turn (again).

**Googlie** · May 17, 2003, 23:18

As a faction you are at a slight disadvantage in that I don't think any of you have been in any PBEM's or Challenges that I've CMN'd, whereas all the others have at least one or two 'vets' from my campaigns.

They'll already know this, so I'm not breaching any "fairness' rules by giving a little insight into how I set up PBEMs:

When I put you on the same landmass as another faction I'll generally separate your start positions by at least 40 tiles, so that it'll be 20 turns or so before you meet (unless the other is Sparta, with their rovers, or the Angels, with their longstriding probes)

I love continents separated by narrow channels (that can be terraformed bridged) or joined by narrow isthsmuses (that can be choke-point defended

Every human faction is as likely to meet the AI as to meet another human faction - it's my "equal opportunity" rule, giving all factions the chance to meet and conquer (or be conquered by) the AI, or to trade and pact with them (maybe with the exception in this game of the Pirates who can prolly explore and contact faster than anyone else)

As the intent of this game is the creation of 'virtual societies', where the fun is as much in the byplays, propaganda, newspapers, etc (and the turnplaying is only to more formalize the discoveries, diplomacy, etc), it would be remiss of me to set it up so that a human-played team could be destroyed within 40 or 50 turns (unless through gross negligence such as leaving bases undefended for Miriam's hordes to waltz into.)

I tweak the AI generally to follow their preferences/aversions as regards Pacting or Vendettas. To recap:

Believers - Choices: Fundy ..... Aversions: Knowledge
Angels - Choices: Democratic ... Aversions:Power

(but they have surprised me in games where they have gone counter-intuitive)

I trust that helps in the deliberations

G.

Announcement

Science discussion thread

Science discussion thread

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment