Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

PEACE Relations - To trade or not to trade? REDONE

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • PEACE Relations - To trade or not to trade? REDONE

    We have had this debate for a while now, and it has come to crunch time. I have been debating with Flubber a lot this evening, and I am very much for this trade now. If we trade, we have a very good chance of getting a Pact. Thus not only do we gain Soc Psy, which we need for a builder game and for SPs, we also gain an ally and a way to diminish the power of the PUT. They seem very ameanable, and they said with a pact they would probably trade Doc Flex too. I believe we will gain enormously from this. As we do not know where they are, war could be futile, and we gain in commerce too with this.

    You have seen Flubber's logic, and I think they are not trying to out do us. Indeed, I have convinced Flubber to hold a snap poll to and he is trying to get us 20 Ec to offer to trade. I believe we should do this deal regardless, however I have said if he can offen a sweetener, it would help me to convince the others. I think we will get a sweetener, possibly Ec, and probably a Pact. Let us show our goodwill, and do this trade. If we get a sweetener, then great. If not, it is still much to our benefit.

    It looks likely that we will get a pact from this. There the vote is 2. A straight trade (obviously I will try to get us more) as issue 1. A trade with a small amount of Ec from them as a sweetener as issue 2. Yea or Nay to both.

    You have 2 days.
    10
    1) Yea
    30.00%
    3
    1) Nay
    20.00%
    2
    2) Yea
    40.00%
    4
    2) Nay
    10.00%
    1

    The poll is expired.

    Smile
    For though he was master of the world, he was not quite sure what to do next
    But he would think of something

    "Hm. I suppose I should get my waffle a santa hat." - Kuciwalker

  • #2
    They seem very ameanable, and they said with a pact they would probably trade Doc Flex too.
    Where? The only vague comment I read was:

    Also a factional decison was made not to offer doc flex at this time. If we reached a closer relationship, sure but not at this moment
    Anyway, I'd vote NAY on both issues. IMO 20 ec is too little.
    Contraria sunt Complementa. -- Niels Bohr
    Mods: SMAniaC (SMAC) & Planetfall (Civ4)

    Comment


    • #3
      I am obviously very strongly for it. We have a lot to gain, possibly even the game. I cannot see a reason against anymore. We gain techwise, commerce, sercurity and influence wise. A sweetener would be nice, and I will try very hard for one, but if we cannot, then I am still very much for it. Please post reasons for your vote.

      Dicussion here BTW.
      Smile
      For though he was master of the world, he was not quite sure what to do next
      But he would think of something

      "Hm. I suppose I should get my waffle a santa hat." - Kuciwalker

      Comment


      • #4
        Maniac: Why? He said about a Pact in a PM to me. That was about all he said, but he said that he would try for a Pact, as he was for it, and says there was much support for it there.
        Smile
        For though he was master of the world, he was not quite sure what to do next
        But he would think of something

        "Hm. I suppose I should get my waffle a santa hat." - Kuciwalker

        Comment


        • #5
          I cannot see a reason against anymore.
          I don't understand why you say that. The reasons are still the same: Doc:Flex and PlaNets are much more valuable techs than SocPsych. Us doing such a trade would be a very bad deal for us.
          Contraria sunt Complementa. -- Niels Bohr
          Mods: SMAniaC (SMAC) & Planetfall (Civ4)

          Comment


          • #6
            We are not trading Plan Nets for Soc Psy. They are researching Plan Nets. They will have it next turn regardless. All we can choose is if both faction shave Plan Nets and not Soc Psy, or if both factions have Soc Psy and Plan Nets. As you saw from Flubbers argument. He is correct. This debate is not about Plan Nets. Both factions will have it regardles of our actions here. This is simply about if we get Soc Psy or not. We may get Doc Flex with a Pact if we agree to this (we have App Psy to offer them). We gain a very valuble tech out of this. WeE have a chance to go for SotHB and so get an extra one (with Biogen and Soc Psy) aswell as much needed Rec Commons. We also gain much commerce and a powerful ally, who can give us commlinks (most likely faction to find them). We have nothing to lose. We have everything to gain. We are not trading Plan Nets, they will get it anyway. We are trading Soc Psy for Soc Psy. Indeed, our trading them Plan Nets means they change production to a less valuble tech, Soc Psy, so their net gain is the same as if we trade them Soc Psy for Soc Psy and we both research Plan Nets ourselves. Value is also debatable. Rec Commons are extremely important, especially to us.
            Smile
            For though he was master of the world, he was not quite sure what to do next
            But he would think of something

            "Hm. I suppose I should get my waffle a santa hat." - Kuciwalker

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Drogue
              We have a chance to go for SotHB and so get an extra one (with Biogen and Soc Psy)
              University announced the discovery of "Secrets" here in 2110

              Comment


              • #8
                Opps Strike that then. However it is still an extremely useful tech. And SotHB puts us closer to getting the Citizens Defence Force, which wouldbe very useful, both for building time, and for military and offensive purposes.
                Smile
                For though he was master of the world, he was not quite sure what to do next
                But he would think of something

                "Hm. I suppose I should get my waffle a santa hat." - Kuciwalker

                Comment


                • #9
                  My vote goes for nay if they do not offer us the Pact. If they do offer the pact (and, of course, try to get a healthy number of ECs), then my fears are allayed. My major concerns were that they would use their advantage against us.

                  HOWEVER, if they offer the pact, accept with the following wording (or some variation)...

                  "The Cybernetic Consciousness presents a gift, consisting of the knowledge and technology to begin construction of Planet-wide Networks to PEACE. This gift is made in good faith based upon the following assumptions, and failure to meet these expectations would gravely diminish PEACE's credibility with the Cybernetic Consciousness.
                  1) A Pact of Siblingship is signed between our two factions no later than Mission Year 2118, solidifying the relationship between our factions, and reaffirming our friendly intentions.
                  2) PEACE's research on Social Psychology, gathered during the aftermath of the Unity exodus, is gifted, in return, to the Cybernetic Consciousness no later than Mission Year 2118, committing our two factions to a research partnership.
                  3) PEACE provides no less than 20 (**or other number agreed upon**) energy credits worth of foreign investment to the Cybernetic Consciousness no later than 2118, allowing for us to improve our trade infrastructure, and furthering the committment to economic integration of our two economies."
                  Comrade Corellion, Secretary of Science and Social Engineering for the Human Hive in the Alpha Centauri Police State Game (ACPSG).
                  Function Corelli Omega-9, Internal Affairs Function (Terms 110, 101, 100, 011, and 010) and Advisor on Foreign Affairs (Term 001) for the Cybernetic Consciousness in the Alpha Centauri Democracy Team Game (ACDTG).
                  The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or one.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Another thing... if they do accept, then let's inform them of the incredible suspicion that their methods of negotiations invoked in many (indeed, at times it seemed all) members of the Cybernetic Consciousness, and suggest that they choose a subtler negotiator... though he did attempt to use logic for his position, his arguments ignored some other, important facets that should have been addressed earlier (the relative worths of the techs, and the possibility of further compensation).
                    Comrade Corellion, Secretary of Science and Social Engineering for the Human Hive in the Alpha Centauri Police State Game (ACPSG).
                    Function Corelli Omega-9, Internal Affairs Function (Terms 110, 101, 100, 011, and 010) and Advisor on Foreign Affairs (Term 001) for the Cybernetic Consciousness in the Alpha Centauri Democracy Team Game (ACDTG).
                    The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few, or one.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Drogue
                      And SotHB puts us closer to getting the Citizens Defence Force,
                      CDF prerequisite tech is Intellectual Integrity (its prereqs are Social Psych >>> Ethical Calculus and Doctrine Mobility >>> Doctrine Loyalty)

                      Secrets is a prereq for Centauri Empathy and Neural Grafting

                      *************************************

                      On a relative tech-value basis:

                      Planetary Networks gives:

                      Probe team ability
                      Ability to run Planned
                      can build Hologram Theatres
                      Can build The Virtual World SP
                      Can create Librarian talents
                      Is a prereq for Industrial Automation and for Cyberethics

                      Doctrine Flexibility

                      Can build with the foil chassis
                      Can build Pressure Domes
                      Is a prereq for Adaptive Doctrine, Doctrine Initiative and for Doctrine AirPower

                      G.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Corellion: So if we can get a Pact, but no Ec, you would be in favour? I am presuming that we will get a pact, as Flubber said that he has convinced many of them, and it looks likely. I think we will get the 20 Ec too.

                        With regards to their diplomacy, I did have words with him about the style and pressure they used, and he apologise, but said that it was due to them having to decide last turn. Personally, I accept that, and he has been extremely polite and civil since then. His views are towards a long term pact, and I am with him on that. I think we have the same fears and views, and they felt the same about our intentions. It was a misunderstanding IMHO.

                        I have the turn, but I promised that we would delay for at least 24 hours in order for polls to get to a decent stage, and for them to decide if they can offer us the Ec and Pact. At the moment, if I get what people mean correct, if they have voted in favour of a Pact, then we are to gift them Plan Nets in return for Soc Psy, regardless of the Ec situation, although I am to push for that. Flubber said it is just game mechanics the way that it works with the gift, and so that he would consider it cheating of they didn't then offer Soc Psy as agreed. I am with him on that, Flubber is a well known PBEMer and has a perfect record AFAIK. Therefore I am not at all worried about them not gifting us afterwards.

                        I think we will get the Pact and the Ec, but if we get the Pact and not the Ec, do I do it or not? Maniac says no, I say yes, Corellion says yes if I get his post right? elijah has PMed me to say yes to both, but I have asked him to vote in the poll too.
                        Smile
                        For though he was master of the world, he was not quite sure what to do next
                        But he would think of something

                        "Hm. I suppose I should get my waffle a santa hat." - Kuciwalker

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Googlie: You are of course correct. I was thinking of getting the Empath Guild, which we don't have. I am sorry about that mistake
                          Smile
                          For though he was master of the world, he was not quite sure what to do next
                          But he would think of something

                          "Hm. I suppose I should get my waffle a santa hat." - Kuciwalker

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I voted yea/yea. Seems to make sense.
                            "I work in IT so I'd be buggered without a computer" - Words of wisdom from Provost Harrison
                            "You can be wrong AND jewish" - Wiglaf :love:

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I have PMed Flubber to ask if he can PM me tomorrow with the results of their polls on the pact and the ec. As this poll stands, we will offer them Plan Nets either way, but he sai that so far there is very strong support form the pact, and that he thinks he can get us the ec. I am reserved but hopeful I will play tomorrow GMT, when I get the results from Flubber.
                              Smile
                              For though he was master of the world, he was not quite sure what to do next
                              But he would think of something

                              "Hm. I suppose I should get my waffle a santa hat." - Kuciwalker

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X