Recreation Commons Courthouse

[Pandemoniak]

µYour Honour, what about the theft ? And who's gonna clean the gents in the Rec Com ?

[Lemmy]

Yes, what about the theft? and the withcraft? and the evilness?

[Pandemoniak]

And WHO'S GONNA CLEAN THE MESS IN THE REC COMMONS ?

mhwuahaha, dont forget that, lemmy

[Archaic]

Originally posted by Pandemoniak
And WHO'S GONNA CLEAN THE MESS IN THE REC COMMONS ?

/me holds up a bucket and mop

Thank you for volunteering unskilled labourer.

[Kassiopeia]

Erm, I know you aren't exactly fond of Pande or anything, but throwing him at the mercy of a huge slimy tentacle monster is just... evil.

[Lemmy]

/me grabs Pandemoniak and drags him to the bathroom

[Method]

another charge! Grand Theft Pandemoniak!

[GeneralTacticus]

[Mr. President]

Your Honour, what about the theft ? And who's gonna clean the gents in the Rec Com ?

Can't anybody take the law into their own hands any more?

[Hercules]

Hercules who has waited patiently at the back of the Rec.Com court room to be formally called to give evidence, advances, calmly and with measured assurance to the witness box

Your honour.

Pandemoniak invites CI Hercules Partet to speak.

Your lordship,your honour, Mr President.

This case started with the simple observation that many of our citizens were 'disappeared'. Through contacts in the underworld and examination of CCTV evidence I approached General Tacticus and then Lemmy, who was given by GT as an Alibi for the night in question, about these disappearing citizens'

When asked under caution, this is what Lemmy had to say-

uhm...29 Aug eh...yes, i think i was DEI then, i believe i was still celebrating my victory in the election, so my memory is not enirely clear on what happened then.
Btw i didn't drown anyone...doh, you didn't say drown did you?

Not exactly damning evidence but nevertheless interesting. It is also the case that none of the original citizens have been seen again alive (there are reports of people of similar appearance being noticed in undead army ranks).

If Lemmy didn't do it who did???

So there are citizens killed regularly but no one knows who does it. though Frankychan, (spotted once near the recycing tanks) acknowledged that the area was well known as a convenient facility for recycling bodies ahead of their time.. In fact Kass and Pande played the sport of 'recycling houdini' (tie contestant in chains and throw into the tank and time escape) there quite often.

Nevertheless people went missing and their 'source' bodies were never found. More on that shortly.

Secondly there was the charge of Grand Theft Xenobrew. There were many witnessess to this though the actual stolen product was never recovered in its original condition. However immediately after the event, Lemmy's 'P' analysis showed distinctive and unique trace elements associated with the Xenobrew batch of the day.

After that there was the CCTV'd record of the Little Theft Microkred and the assault and leaving the scene of the crime

On being approached to answer these charges. Lemmy said

NOOOOOOOOO!!!!
I confess, i did it!!!! I did it all, i stole the money, i confess to the Grand Theft Xenobrew, i confess to the serial
killings!! And you know why i did it? Because i'm evil
Yeah, that's right, EVIL!!!

* Lemmy knocks out Kass for "helping" him.

See, i'm evil...Mwuahahahhahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

After this the charges seem to multiply and including witchcraft which seemed to involved evverything from vampires to cloning: Maniac, Archaic, Gnool. Some of the voices defending ask for evidence.

I here now reveal the most compelling evidence that cloning is being practiced This can surely only be explained by witchcraft or by the intervention of a mad scientist

DE posts this:
Citizen Registry



Out with the old, in with the new.

The previous signup thread will be replaced by this one. Could all members still playing please sign up again, so we know who's still around? Consider this something of a census.

I'll still keep a straight member list in this first post, same as last time, but if each person could please fill in the information below in a seperate post.

Current Members

1) Darkness' Edge
2) Frankychan
3) Tassadar5000
4) Maniac
5) MrWhereItsAt
6) GeneralTacticus
7) moomin
8) Pandemoniak
9) Wojit
10) DeathByTheSword
11) Main_Brain
12) FlameFlash
13) Archaic
14) Joeno
15) Lemmy
16) lucky22
17) TKG
18) Maniac
19) dmm1285
20) Hercules
21) Kassiopeia
22) Mr. President
23) Mellian
24) Vlad Antlerkov
25) AdamTG02
26) Whitemage
27) -Groucho-
28) Earwicker
29) Schinkenjoe
30) Thud

So where did the second Maniac come from (see above 4 and 18)

Lastly we had an excellent prosecutor and many public gallery defenders (who produced splendid legal arguments) amongst the most able was a piece of furniture (some called it the bar). However the same piece of furniture and chandelier declared

I wish to be admitted indefinitely to the mental hospital.

.

This my evidence.

I suggest that Mr President organises a jury poll on the original charges and those charges that have arisen in the process. Sentencing ( if found guilty) will pronounced afterwards by Mr President.

[GeneralTacticus]

I would like to question the validity of this evidence:

NOOOOOOOOO!!!!
I confess, i did it!!!! I did it all, i stole the money, i confess to the Grand Theft Xenobrew, i confess to the serial
killings!! And you know why i did it? Because i'm evil
Yeah, that's right, EVIL!!!

* Lemmy knocks out Kass for "helping" him.

See, i'm evil...Mwuahahahhahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

As Lemmy has repeatedly indicated that he wants to go to jail. Hence, this evidence cannot be trustworthy, as it is likely to be biased.

[Hercules]

Mr President The fact that Lemmy repeatedly indicates that he wants to go to jail does not invalidate this properly witnessed confession.

This may well be a clever triple bluff strategy to avoid the double jeapardy angle if more evidence emerges.

It may well be a quadruple strategy for all we know.

Your honour and the jury, stick to the known evidence.

[GeneralTacticus]

Mr President The fact that Lemmy repeatedly indicates that he wants to go to jail does not invalidate this properly witnessed confession.

Ah, but it does. If he wants to go to jail, then his confessions cannot be trusted, as they are likely to be untrue. As for the bluff angle, this only invalidates his confessions, not any other evidence that may be produced.