I mostly agree with DBTS.
Industry and Energy as it stands doesn't do much. Recommends mineral- and energy-increasing facilities to Base Production, yes, but I don't think we need a Director to recommend ever single thing. (Who recommends Children's Creches?) Possibly manages supply crawlers, if Base Production doesn't do it. Possibly manages the Economy rate in consultation with SE and Science, if we don't want to make energy rates just an SE function. Possibly okays energy expenditure, if we don't want to allow the Directors of Foreign Affairs, Base Production, and Exploration and Intelligence to make that decision on their own. (What to do if Santiago demands 1000 energy credits, and you can't find the Director of I&E?)
I'd favor merging the two. The problem is that we have seperate candidate lists for both positions, and the ACE supports two seperate candidates (Juliennew and Vlad Antlerkov). So it might be political, and I do not want the constitutional debate to become political or partisan. If the ACE can agree to merge the two, I'd be all for it. If not, we'll figure some compromise out.
Anyway, I've started a seperate thread on the topic.
Thoughts?
Industry and Energy as it stands doesn't do much. Recommends mineral- and energy-increasing facilities to Base Production, yes, but I don't think we need a Director to recommend ever single thing. (Who recommends Children's Creches?) Possibly manages supply crawlers, if Base Production doesn't do it. Possibly manages the Economy rate in consultation with SE and Science, if we don't want to make energy rates just an SE function. Possibly okays energy expenditure, if we don't want to allow the Directors of Foreign Affairs, Base Production, and Exploration and Intelligence to make that decision on their own. (What to do if Santiago demands 1000 energy credits, and you can't find the Director of I&E?)
I'd favor merging the two. The problem is that we have seperate candidate lists for both positions, and the ACE supports two seperate candidates (Juliennew and Vlad Antlerkov). So it might be political, and I do not want the constitutional debate to become political or partisan. If the ACE can agree to merge the two, I'd be all for it. If not, we'll figure some compromise out.
Anyway, I've started a seperate thread on the topic.
Thoughts?
Comment