Today at 11:00 pm, AdamTG has been received at the CCCP's office onboard the Unity, in the wing occupied by the Peacekeepers faction. Pandemoniak and Adam were assisted by Tassadar, famous UNN Chief Editor and Second member to date of the CCCP.
adamtg: Greetings, Tassadar.
tassadar5000: Greetings, Adam.
pandemoniak81: Welcome Adam, welcome Comrade Tassadar. Please take one of these comfortable armchairs, we're not rich here at the CCCP, but we take care of our guests"
adamtg then told tassadar: Pandemoniak and I have been discussing what we'd like to lay before the Constitutional Committee, and we seem to agree on a few issues.
pandemoniak81:"Indeed, we were saying we shouldnt merge the directorates of Base Production and Industry and Economy, but give Bas Production the task to choose the tiles to harvest and the things to built, while the Directorate of Industry and Energy would decide of the allocation of energy and the rushes for building", he replied, while pouring himself an imported Talisker from earth, a gift from Lady Deirdre Skye before what is now called the "faction separations".
tassadar5000: Ok, and what is your reasoning for this?
pandemoniak81: it makes the DoIE not a big directorate, but even back on Earth, there's always been some small ministers...
adamtg: This would allow the candidates who are running for either job on the assumption that thy are seperate keep in the running without having to run against one another.
pandemoniak81: else the DoBP gets to much powers and tasks
adamtg: Also, it makes more sense to separate base production from energy rates.
adamtg: My personal preference is to put all energy rates into Social Engineering, but on the recent discussion onboard, there doesn't seem to be as much support for that.
tassadar5000: I would support that.
pandemoniak81: I dont really care.
tassadar5000: Because....Why split the power up for something obviously very relevant? It makes things inefficent.
adamtg: The problem is that the ACE supports two seperate candidates for Industry & Energy and Base Production. If we proposed a merger I'm afraid it might be seen as political. But I don't want the Constitution to be divisive along party lines. And I'd agree with you there if it were up to me, Tassadar.
pandemoniak81: Yes, indeed, parties are made to allow people with same conceptions to talk together in an efficient, organized way.
adamtg: Hmm, but my goal is to prevent that from happening in the limited amount of time we will spend on Constitutional drafting.
tassadar5000: But the P4 is shifting candidates simply to counter CCCP candidates. Its quite obvious
pandemoniak81: We must make a constitution so that people and not parties will lead the game. So we must give a very importance to polls.
adamtg: true
pandemoniak81: yes, its true, but they cant build a campaign just by "NO CCCP CANDIDATES - VOTE FOR ME"
adamtg: In my mind, the most important function of a party is not to sponsor candidates but to foster debate between members with similar interests and marshal support on
pandemoniak81: What is as well discussed for the constitution ?
adamtg: We've covered energy rates and the Director of Industry and Energy issue.
pandemoniak81:Yep, whats next to be discussed ?
adamtg: If so, then the only remaining issue is impeachment. Some favor keeping it out of the Constitution for simplicity. Others want it in so that we can deal with a bad Director or Commissioner if necessary.
pandemoniak81: Well... it must be part of the constitution
adamtg: *listens*
tassadar5000: I think that any citizen should be able to attempt to impeach someone (with sufficent proof that they ened to be impeached, not just "impeach him!!!") and if theres a 3/4 vote (75%) then the person is impeached
pandemoniak81: yeah, tass, how do we define "sufficient proof" ?
adamtg: Hmm. My thought was that it would need to be a Director and a 2/3 vote would be necessary. If we decided it was warranted for impeachment to be in the Constitution.
tassadar5000: Sufficent proof would be if the citizens said "yeah, that is deserving of impeachment". But any "Lets impeach Pand" thing withotu ANY proof should be automatically deemed invalid
pandemoniak81: But the thing is that we'd need a judiciar branch
tassadar5000: or we could set up a court...
adamtg: In the United States the Senate decides impeachment. (In France it was a court if I remember correctly; I am not sure of that, but I'll stick to what I know. Tomorrow on Planet, the closest thing to a Senate is the people.
pandemoniak81: In france, it's a court. And I also think we'd need a court. That would moderate ourselves in a good way.
adamtg: I would rather not set up a court this early in. Let's try to make this work without extra bureaucracy, and if it's necessary, we can institute it later.
tassadar5000: One problem remains with that : party politics. Say a ton of people from various parties and alliegences get up there. well.....
adamtg: Right.
adamtg: Call me a supporter of the back-on-earth American radical democrat, but I'd rather not have a small body deciding impeachments -- the smaller the body, the easier it is to fill it with your supporters.
tassadar5000: correct
pandemoniak81: the court must be independant of politic forces, like it was in France, unlike in the USA, so if someone joins the court, he has to leave his party, and swear to be an honnest judge, etc...
adamtg: Thus we'd have to have some sort of check on that -- what you say is a possible check, but can we trust it?
pandemoniak81: well, we have to trust people, after all, its a new beginning on Planet, not a "do-your-own-stalinist-nixonist-conspiracy" game
tassadar5000: Call me an evil chinese maoist, but if we trust people blindly it'll turn into a "do your own stalinist conspiracy" game
pandemoniak81: well, we just cant avoid that... or maybe we could ask our defunt leader's assistant MarkosG to be or to set up a Court ?
tassadar5000: we could. but....I still say the PEOPLE should be the Senate/Court
adamtg: Hmm. Pandemoniak, what I propose is to listen to other committee members on the issue. If we can't come to a clear agreement now, we might be able to with input from others.
pandemoniak81: ok ok, but not that I disagree with the people being the court, because the court must be independant of politic forces. Anyway, whats next ?
adamtg: That's about all. Throughout, I've been assuming that we will want to amend the constitution.
pandemoniak81f course... I must leave you now, comrades, since I am still working on my next book, W(R)ONG : history of Marx's understanding"...
adamtg: Greetings, Tassadar.
tassadar5000: Greetings, Adam.
pandemoniak81: Welcome Adam, welcome Comrade Tassadar. Please take one of these comfortable armchairs, we're not rich here at the CCCP, but we take care of our guests"
adamtg then told tassadar: Pandemoniak and I have been discussing what we'd like to lay before the Constitutional Committee, and we seem to agree on a few issues.
pandemoniak81:"Indeed, we were saying we shouldnt merge the directorates of Base Production and Industry and Economy, but give Bas Production the task to choose the tiles to harvest and the things to built, while the Directorate of Industry and Energy would decide of the allocation of energy and the rushes for building", he replied, while pouring himself an imported Talisker from earth, a gift from Lady Deirdre Skye before what is now called the "faction separations".
tassadar5000: Ok, and what is your reasoning for this?
pandemoniak81: it makes the DoIE not a big directorate, but even back on Earth, there's always been some small ministers...
adamtg: This would allow the candidates who are running for either job on the assumption that thy are seperate keep in the running without having to run against one another.
pandemoniak81: else the DoBP gets to much powers and tasks
adamtg: Also, it makes more sense to separate base production from energy rates.
adamtg: My personal preference is to put all energy rates into Social Engineering, but on the recent discussion onboard, there doesn't seem to be as much support for that.
tassadar5000: I would support that.
pandemoniak81: I dont really care.
tassadar5000: Because....Why split the power up for something obviously very relevant? It makes things inefficent.
adamtg: The problem is that the ACE supports two seperate candidates for Industry & Energy and Base Production. If we proposed a merger I'm afraid it might be seen as political. But I don't want the Constitution to be divisive along party lines. And I'd agree with you there if it were up to me, Tassadar.
pandemoniak81: Yes, indeed, parties are made to allow people with same conceptions to talk together in an efficient, organized way.
adamtg: Hmm, but my goal is to prevent that from happening in the limited amount of time we will spend on Constitutional drafting.
tassadar5000: But the P4 is shifting candidates simply to counter CCCP candidates. Its quite obvious
pandemoniak81: We must make a constitution so that people and not parties will lead the game. So we must give a very importance to polls.
adamtg: true
pandemoniak81: yes, its true, but they cant build a campaign just by "NO CCCP CANDIDATES - VOTE FOR ME"
adamtg: In my mind, the most important function of a party is not to sponsor candidates but to foster debate between members with similar interests and marshal support on
pandemoniak81: What is as well discussed for the constitution ?
adamtg: We've covered energy rates and the Director of Industry and Energy issue.
pandemoniak81:Yep, whats next to be discussed ?
adamtg: If so, then the only remaining issue is impeachment. Some favor keeping it out of the Constitution for simplicity. Others want it in so that we can deal with a bad Director or Commissioner if necessary.
pandemoniak81: Well... it must be part of the constitution
adamtg: *listens*
tassadar5000: I think that any citizen should be able to attempt to impeach someone (with sufficent proof that they ened to be impeached, not just "impeach him!!!") and if theres a 3/4 vote (75%) then the person is impeached
pandemoniak81: yeah, tass, how do we define "sufficient proof" ?
adamtg: Hmm. My thought was that it would need to be a Director and a 2/3 vote would be necessary. If we decided it was warranted for impeachment to be in the Constitution.
tassadar5000: Sufficent proof would be if the citizens said "yeah, that is deserving of impeachment". But any "Lets impeach Pand" thing withotu ANY proof should be automatically deemed invalid
pandemoniak81: But the thing is that we'd need a judiciar branch
tassadar5000: or we could set up a court...
adamtg: In the United States the Senate decides impeachment. (In France it was a court if I remember correctly; I am not sure of that, but I'll stick to what I know. Tomorrow on Planet, the closest thing to a Senate is the people.
pandemoniak81: In france, it's a court. And I also think we'd need a court. That would moderate ourselves in a good way.
adamtg: I would rather not set up a court this early in. Let's try to make this work without extra bureaucracy, and if it's necessary, we can institute it later.
tassadar5000: One problem remains with that : party politics. Say a ton of people from various parties and alliegences get up there. well.....
adamtg: Right.
adamtg: Call me a supporter of the back-on-earth American radical democrat, but I'd rather not have a small body deciding impeachments -- the smaller the body, the easier it is to fill it with your supporters.
tassadar5000: correct
pandemoniak81: the court must be independant of politic forces, like it was in France, unlike in the USA, so if someone joins the court, he has to leave his party, and swear to be an honnest judge, etc...
adamtg: Thus we'd have to have some sort of check on that -- what you say is a possible check, but can we trust it?
pandemoniak81: well, we have to trust people, after all, its a new beginning on Planet, not a "do-your-own-stalinist-nixonist-conspiracy" game
tassadar5000: Call me an evil chinese maoist, but if we trust people blindly it'll turn into a "do your own stalinist conspiracy" game
pandemoniak81: well, we just cant avoid that... or maybe we could ask our defunt leader's assistant MarkosG to be or to set up a Court ?
tassadar5000: we could. but....I still say the PEOPLE should be the Senate/Court
adamtg: Hmm. Pandemoniak, what I propose is to listen to other committee members on the issue. If we can't come to a clear agreement now, we might be able to with input from others.
pandemoniak81: ok ok, but not that I disagree with the people being the court, because the court must be independant of politic forces. Anyway, whats next ?
adamtg: That's about all. Throughout, I've been assuming that we will want to amend the constitution.
pandemoniak81f course... I must leave you now, comrades, since I am still working on my next book, W(R)ONG : history of Marx's understanding"...
Comment