Nomination Thread - Term 1

[Maniac]

Some by design, others because they couldn't get to another pod in time.

Darn! I was hoping I could still catch Deirdre's pod.

[Kassiopeia]

If we go for Green ASAP, Dee might want to visit our faction.

[Maniac]

Originally posted by Kassiopeia
If we go for Green ASAP, Dee might want to visit our faction.

But if we go FM, she might come even sooner. I'm wondering how she looks when she's angry.

[Tactical Marine]

I'd like to switch my candincy to Directir of I&E

[Kassiopeia]

But if we go FM, she might come even sooner.

But she won't come to prance around naked; oh, she'll have protection. A Hovertank to be precise. Many Hovertanks.

[Method]

Originally posted by Kassiopeia
A Hovertank to be precise. Many Hovertanks.

[Archaic]

Originally posted by Kassiopeia


Correct me if I'm wrong, but are we talking about this Air Force base with immense mineral production? My question is, this base will be very low on population and therefore there won't be a drone problem so big that any regular means (specialists, Rec Commons, Holo Theatres etc.) couldn't quell. So I see idea of building this PS useless, besides I find erecting them very immoral.

Yes, we are. However, unlike some others, I do not believe this base is workable as a size 1 talent base. The ease with which a foe could destroy a small base, thereby spreading the costs of (And drones caused by) these units around our bases is an unacceptable risk

Originally posted by Kassiopeia
Wormhunting. Increased Efficiency. A 20 percent combat bonus in psi combat.

Wormhunting and Psi Combat aren't likely to be much of a factor early in the game. As for Increased Efficiency, we'd actually be better served by being less efficient but pulling in more energy through Free Market. While under a Green economy there might be less wastage, under Free Market the sheer volume of energy that would be drawn in makes the slight wastage we might have (Remember, we'd be democratic as soon as we could take the support costs.) irrelevant.

Originally posted by Kassiopeia
The Psych rate is not the only way to prevent drone riots; besides, a base under riots can not produce a thing so I find preventing them a necessity.

I'm not saying that we shouldn't prevent them, only that it's probably not the DoSE's position to actually do that. As I said, it's not the DoSE's place to assign workers or build structures, though I would of course push for ones which would keep the citizens content.

[Lemmy]

Originally posted by TKG
it doesnt count unless they post it here

Ahem!!

Originally posted by Lemmy
I'm running as the ACE and SSK candidate for Director of Science

[Method]

fair enough.

[Nubclear]

Originally posted by Lemmy


Ahem!!

See people! If you find anything wrong, all you have to do is post!

Ya dont need to flame me in my PM box Jk. Well...sort of. Just post it here, I check this thread more.

[Vlad Antlerkov]

IMPORTANT: Changing my candidacy

I'm switching to running for Director of Industry and Energy from Director of Social Engineering.

As there's been talk of merging those two positions, I figured it'd be better for whoever ends up winning the SE Director spot could focus on just Social Engineering.

[DeathByTheSword]

Here by I declare I want to run for office of DoD. my intire policy will soon come but it all gets packed in to these words.
*flexibly*
*elite*
*fast*
*swift*

[lucky22]

I'd like to throw my hat in the ring for minister of Base Production. I am a member of the CCCP.

Balanced infrastructure and humane working conditions! Even for the golden typists of the bougeoisie!

[Sprayber]

hmmmm should there not be a limit on how many times people can change the office they are running for. It seems people are switching just to be elected to anything.

[AdamTG02]

The reason people are switching is that coalitions are forming and, slowly, we seem to be moving toward a 3-way race in many of the elections. Not saying whether that's good or bad, but that's what I see.