The whole self-interest versus altruism debate, though an interesting one, ultimately becomes a moot point IMHO. The reasons for doing something don't matter so much as the end result. Besides, anything you do can somehow be traced back to self-interest, but it doesn't matter, and can't really be used to prove anything.
To use Prime Function Drogue's example of giving to charity, why does it matter if you did it because it made you "feel good" to improve the lives of the less fortunate (as it should)? Your intention was to help the less fortunate (if it was solely to make yourself feel good, then you could have probably found some less expensive ways!), and if you yourself derived some benefit from that, all the better.
(Sorry if this post is a little disjointed, but I'm in a hurry).
To use Prime Function Drogue's example of giving to charity, why does it matter if you did it because it made you "feel good" to improve the lives of the less fortunate (as it should)? Your intention was to help the less fortunate (if it was solely to make yourself feel good, then you could have probably found some less expensive ways!), and if you yourself derived some benefit from that, all the better.
(Sorry if this post is a little disjointed, but I'm in a hurry).
... there are definately cases where altruism is another form of self-interest, though. I put altruism in quotes in my original post because it wasn't really the word I was looking for but it was the best I could do at the time. I think "selflessness" might be more accurate, but I'm sure sociologists have beaten that one to death too.

Comment